Effect anticipation and action control

According to the authors' 2-phase model of action control, people first incidentally acquire bidirectional associations between motor patterns and movement-contingent events and then intentionally use these associations for goal-directed action. The authors tested the model in 4 experiments, each comprising an acquisition phase, in which participants experienced co-occurrences between left and right keypresses and low- and high-pitched tones, and a test phase, in which the tones preceded the responses in forced- and free-choice designs. Both reaction time and response frequency in the test phase depended on the learned associations, indicating that presenting a tone activated the associated response. Results are interpreted as evidence for automatic action-outcome integration and automatic response priming through learned action effects. These processes may be basic for the control of voluntary action by the anticipation of action goals.

[1]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[2]  E. Tolman Purposive behavior in animals and men , 1932 .

[3]  D. Berlyne Conflict and choice time. , 1957, British journal of psychology.

[4]  W. Brogden,et al.  Supplementary report:effect upon sensory preconditioning of backward, forward, and trace preconditioning training. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  Jean Piaget Das Erwachen der Intelligenz beim Kinde , 1969 .

[6]  M. A. Trapold,et al.  Are expectancies based upon different positive reinforcing events discriminably different , 1970 .

[7]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. , 1970, Psychological review.

[8]  A. Greenwald,et al.  A choice reaction time test of ideomotor theory. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  R. Schmidt Proprioception and the timing of motor responses. , 1971, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  John F. Hall Backward conditioning in Pavlovian type studies , 1984, The Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science.

[11]  W. Meck Postreinforcement signal processing. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[12]  H. Heuer,et al.  Perspectives on Perception and Action , 1989 .

[13]  S. Tipper,et al.  Mechanisms of attention: a developmental study. , 1989, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[14]  A. Diamond Developmental Time Course in Human Infants and Infant Monkeys, and the Neural Bases of, Inhibitory Control in Reaching a , 1990, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[15]  W. Prinz,et al.  Relationships Between Perception and Action: Current Approaches , 1990 .

[16]  W. Prinz A common-coding approach to perception and action , 1990 .

[17]  R. Rescorla Response-outcome versus outcome-response associations in instrumental learning , 1992 .

[18]  R. Rescorla Preservation of response-outcome associations through extinction , 1993 .

[19]  A. Meltzoff Chapter 18 The Centrality of Motor Coordination and Proprioception in Social and Cognitive Development: from Shared Actions to Shared Minds , 1993 .

[20]  Geert J. P. Savelsbergh,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF COORDINATION IN INFANCY , 1993 .

[21]  M. Jeannerod The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[22]  Robert A. Rescorla Full Preservation of a Response–Outcome Association through Training with a Second Outcome , 1995 .

[23]  B Hommel,et al.  The cognitive representation of action: Automatic integration of perceived action effects , 1996, Psychological research.

[24]  T. DeMarse,et al.  Associative processes in differential outcome discriminations. , 1996 .

[25]  W. Prinz Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[26]  B. Hommel Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility , 1997 .

[27]  W. Prinz,et al.  Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility , 1997 .

[28]  N. Mackintosh Has the Wheel Turned Full Circle? Fifty Years of Learning Theory, 1946–1996 , 1997 .

[29]  J. S. Jordan,et al.  Systems theories and a priori aspects of perception , 1998 .

[30]  B. Hommel PERCEIVING ONE'S OWN ACTION : AND WHAT IT LEADS TO , 1998 .

[31]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes , 1999 .

[32]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.