Opportunistic localization of underwater robots using drifters and boats

The paper characterizes the localization performance of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) when it moves in environments where floating drifters or surface vessels are present and can be used for relative localization. In particular, we study how localization performance is affected by parameters e.g. AUV mobility, surface objects density, the available measurements (ranging and/or bearing) and their visibility range. We refer to known techniques for estimation performance evaluation and probabilistic mobility models, and we bring them together to provide a solid numerical analysis for the considered problem. We perform an extensive simulations in different scenarios, and, as a proof of concept, we show how an AUV, equipped with an upward looking sonar, can improve its localization estimate by detecting a surface vessel.

[1]  O Hegrenaes,et al.  Model-Aided INS With Sea Current Estimation for Robust Underwater Navigation , 2011, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[2]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Probabilistic robotics , 2002, CACM.

[3]  Konstantinos Psounis,et al.  An analytical study of fundamental mobility properties for encounter-based protocols , 2008, Int. J. Auton. Adapt. Commun. Syst..

[4]  A. Caiti,et al.  Localization of autonomous underwater vehicles by floating acoustic buoys: a set-membership approach , 2005, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[5]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Conditional Posterior Cramér-Rao Lower Bounds for Nonlinear Sequential Bayesian Estimation , 2011, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[6]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Achieving connectivity through coalescence in mobile robot networks , 2007 .

[7]  Carlos H. Muravchik,et al.  Posterior Cramer-Rao bounds for discrete-time nonlinear filtering , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[8]  Honghai Liu,et al.  Navigation Technologies for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[9]  Jeff Smith,et al.  Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Navigation , 1995 .

[10]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Latency Analysis of Coalescence for Robot Groups , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Hanumant Singh,et al.  Preliminary deep water results in single-beacon one-way-travel-time acoustic navigation for underwater vehicles , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[12]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  Properties of random direction models , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[13]  Dezhen Song,et al.  On the Time to Search for an Intermittent Signal Source Under a Limited Sensing Range , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[14]  Ahmed Helmy,et al.  A survey of mobility modeling and analysis in wireless adhoc networks , 2004 .

[15]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Conditional Posterior Cramér–Rao Lower Bounds for Nonlinear Sequential Bayesian Estimation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[16]  Y. Bar-Shalom,et al.  Tracking in a cluttered environment with probabilistic data association , 1975, Autom..

[17]  John J. Leonard,et al.  Cooperative AUV Navigation using a Single Maneuvering Surface Craft , 2010, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[18]  Yong Qi,et al.  Online Estimation of the Approximate Posterior Cramer-Rao Lower Bound for Discrete-Time Nonlinear Filtering , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[19]  Brian Bingham,et al.  Predicting the navigation performance of underwater vehicles , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[20]  G. Niemeyer,et al.  Springer Handbook of Robotics: Chapter 31 , 2008 .

[21]  Daniel J. Stilwell,et al.  Underwater navigation in the presence of unknown currents based on range measurements from a single location , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference, 2005..