Multimodal Connections between Dockless Bikesharing and Ride-Hailing: An Empirical Study in New York City

Motivated by the meteoric rise in the adoption of both ride-hailing services (DiDi, Uber, Lyft, etc.) and dockless bikesharing services (Ofo, Mobike, LimeBike, etc.), we propose a multimodal system where passengers ride a dockless bikeshare to/from hubs where they switch modes to/from a carpool. The proposed mutlimodal system is a generalization of the existing Uber ExpressPool service. The goal of this paper is to test empirically the feasibility of the proposed multimodal system. We accomplish this goal with the aid of time-stamped taxi origin/destination data from New York City. The analysis has two steps: network design and trip assignment. First, we identify 17 carpool hub locations with a coverage of 1 km to capture all taxi trip demand within Manhattan during peak hours. After designing the network, we then assign trips to carpools, within each hub, that have similar trip start times and destinations. We formulate the assignment problem as an offline matching algorithm on a bipartite graph. We found that over 80 percent of all trips can be assigned to carpools at almost all hubs. Compared to a single-modal system, the multimodal system served the same number of passengers with 40 percent fewer taxis. We found the matching rate to be consistent for every month in 2015. These results provide initial evidence that multimodal connections between ride-hailing and dockless bikesharing are feasible, reduces passenger trip times, and decreases road congestion.

[1]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  Ridepooling with trip-chaining in a shared-vehicle mobility-on-demand system , 2017, 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[2]  R. Jayakrishnan,et al.  A Real-Time Algorithm to Solve the Peer-to-Peer Ride-Matching Problem in a Flexible Ridesharing System , 2017 .

[3]  Kaan Ozbay,et al.  Revisiting Labor Supply of New York City Taxi Drivers: Empirical Evidence from Large-Scale Taxi Data , 2015 .

[4]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  Hail a cab or ride a bike? A travel time comparison of taxi and bicycle-sharing systems in New York City , 2017 .

[5]  Benjamín Barán,et al.  An open-data approach for quantifying the potential of taxi ridesharing , 2017, Decis. Support Syst..

[6]  Naveen Eluru,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Bike Sharing Usage and Rebalancing: Evidence from Barcelona and Seville , 2015 .

[7]  Colin Murphy,et al.  Shared Mobility and the Transformation of Public Transit , 2016 .

[8]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  On-demand high-capacity ride-sharing via dynamic trip-vehicle assignment , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  Robotic load balancing for mobility-on-demand systems , 2012, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[10]  Niels A. H. Agatz,et al.  The Benefits of Meeting Points in Ride-Sharing Systems , 2015 .

[11]  Paolo Santi,et al.  Supporting Information for Quantifying the Benefits of Vehicle Pooling with Shareability Networks Data Set and Pre-processing , 2022 .

[12]  G. Zhu,et al.  A New View of Classification in Astronomy with the Archetype Technique: An Astronomical Case of the NP-complete Set Cover Problem , 2016, 1606.07156.

[13]  Liang Ma,et al.  Site Visits, Policy Learning, and the Diffusion of Policy Innovation: Evidence from Public Bicycle Programs in China , 2017 .