Newer laboratory approaches for assessing visual dysfunction.

The crucial point that will be emphasized throughout this report is the potential utility of analyzing visual cortical receptive field (RF) properties of the single-cell level as a sensitive and reliable neurotoxicity screening tool. Numerous studies employing exposure of kittens to altered visual environments during the critical period have demonstrated that particular classes of RFs can be selectively affected while sparing others. There has been a rapid proliferation of new methods used to investigate such effects. An important current trend involves the development of multidisciplinary combinations of approaches. The various maneuvers reviewed here seem adaptable to studying neurotoxic insult of the sensitive properties of cortical visual neurons, particularly in the cat or monkey. Conceivably, a general disruption of cortical RF properties might be expected following toxic exposure since individual RF properties are generally not determined by completely independent mechanisms. In fact, some toxicants might produce a general degradation of RF properties akin to the electrophysiological results reported for long-term dark rearing or binocular deprivation.

[1]  S. Levay,et al.  Ocular dominance columns and their development in layer IV of the cat's visual cortex: A quantitative study , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[2]  D. N. Spinelli,et al.  Visual Experience Modifies Distribution of Horizontally and Vertically Oriented Receptive Fields in Cats , 1970, Science.

[3]  M. Stryker,et al.  Modification of cortical orientation selectivity in the cat by restricted visual experience: a reexamination , 1975, Science.

[4]  Z. Annau,et al.  Evoked potential alterations following prenatal methyl mercury exposure , 1978, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[5]  D H HUBEL,et al.  RECEPTIVE FIELDS AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE IN TWO NONSTRIATE VISUAL AREAS (18 AND 19) OF THE CAT. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  The effect of visual experience on the development of stimulus specificity by kitten cortical neurones , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  D. Creel,et al.  The photically evoked afterdischarge: Current concepts and potential applications , 1978 .

[8]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  A. Wagman Event-related Brain Potentials in Man , 1981 .

[10]  D E Mitchell,et al.  A Behavioural Technique for the Rapid Assessment of the Visual Capabilities of Kittens , 1977, Perception.

[11]  R. Blake The visual system of the cat , 1979 .

[12]  D. Hubel,et al.  The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Local perfusion of noradrenaline maintains visual cortical plasticity , 1978, Nature.

[14]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Environmental Modification of the Visual Cortex and the Neural Basis of Learning and Memory , 1973, Nature.

[15]  A. Sillito The contribution of inhibitory mechanisms to the receptive field properties of neurones in the striate cortex of the cat. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  Z. Annau,et al.  Prenatal carbon monoxide and adult evoked potentials in rats. , 1979, Journal of environmental science and health. Part C: Environmental health sciences.

[17]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Development of single-neuron responses in kitten's lateral geniculate nucleus. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  E. Bigler Neurophysiology, neuropharmacology and behavioral relationships of visual system evoked after-discharges: A review☆ , 1977 .

[19]  D. Hubel,et al.  Orientation columns in macaque monkey visual cortex demonstrated by the 2-deoxyglucose autoradiographic technique , 1977, Nature.

[20]  H. Hirsch,et al.  Deficits in binocular depth perception in cats after alternating monocular deprivation , 1975, Science.

[21]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Restoration of visual cortical plasticity by local microperfusion of norepinephrine , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[22]  D. Brown,et al.  Loss of X-cells in lateral geniculate nucleus with monocular paralysis: neural plasticity in the adult cat. , 1975, Science.

[23]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Antagonism in Visual Cortex: Different Effects on Simple, Complex, and Hypercomplex Neurons , 1973, Science.

[24]  M. Verzeano,et al.  EVOKED RESPONSES AND NETWORK DYNAMICS , 1970 .

[25]  D E Mitchell,et al.  Visual Resolution and Experience: Acuity Deficits in Cats Following Early Selective Visual Deprivation , 1973, Science.

[26]  G. F. Cooper,et al.  Development of the Brain depends on the Visual Environment , 1970, Nature.

[27]  D. Hubel,et al.  Sequence regularity and geometry of orientation columns in the monkey striate cortex , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Depletion of brain catecholamines: failure of ocular dominance shift after monocular occlusion in kittens. , 1976, Science.

[29]  P. Lennie Parallel visual pathways: A review , 1980, Vision Research.

[30]  R. Klorman EVENT RELATED BRAIN POTENTIALS ACROSS THE LIFE SPAN , 1978 .

[31]  D. Mitchell,et al.  A physiological and behavioural study in cats of the effect of early visual experience with contours of a single orientation. , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  W. Singer,et al.  Modification of direction selectivity of neurons in the visual cortex of kittens , 1975, Brain Research.