Activation of Parallel Fiber Feedback by Spatially Diffuse Stimuli Reduces Signal and Noise Correlations via Independent Mechanisms in a Cerebellum-Like Structure

Correlations between the activities of neighboring neurons are observed ubiquitously across systems and species and are dynamically regulated by several factors such as the stimulus' spatiotemporal extent as well as by the brain's internal state. Using the electrosensory system of gymnotiform weakly electric fish, we recorded the activities of pyramidal cell pairs within the electrosensory lateral line lobe (ELL) under spatially localized and diffuse stimulation. We found that both signal and noise correlations were markedly reduced (>40%) under the latter stimulation. Through a network model incorporating key anatomical features of the ELL, we reveal how activation of diffuse parallel fiber feedback from granule cells by spatially diffuse stimulation can explain both the reduction in signal as well as the reduction in noise correlations seen experimentally through independent mechanisms. First, we show that burst-timing dependent plasticity, which leads to a negative image of the stimulus and thereby reduces single neuron responses, decreases signal but not noise correlations. Second, we show trial-to-trial variability in the responses of single granule cells to sensory input reduces noise but not signal correlations. Thus, our model predicts that the same feedback pathway can simultaneously reduce both signal and noise correlations through independent mechanisms. To test this prediction experimentally, we pharmacologically inactivated parallel fiber feedback onto ELL pyramidal cells. In agreement with modeling predictions, we found that inactivation increased both signal and noise correlations but that there was no significant relationship between magnitude of the increase in signal correlations and the magnitude of the increase in noise correlations. The mechanisms reported in this study are expected to be generally applicable to the cerebellum as well as other cerebellum-like structures. We further discuss the implications of such decorrelation on the neural coding strategies used by the electrosensory and by other systems to process natural stimuli.

[1]  Maurice J. Chacron,et al.  Motion processing across multiple topographic maps in the electrosensory system , 2014, Physiological reports.

[2]  N. Sawtell,et al.  Cerebellum-like structures and their implications for cerebellar function. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[3]  W T Thach,et al.  On-beam synchrony in the cerebellum as the mechanism for the timing and coordination of movement , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  J. Bastian,et al.  Dendritic modulation of burst-like firing in sensory neurons. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  L. Abbott,et al.  Neural network dynamics. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[6]  Leonard Maler,et al.  Receptive field organization across multiple electrosensory maps. I. Columnar organization and estimation of receptive field size , 2009, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  F. Rieke,et al.  Noise correlations improve response fidelity and stimulus encoding , 2010, Nature.

[8]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Attention improves performance primarily by reducing interneuronal correlations , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  Ehud Zohary,et al.  Correlated neuronal discharge rate and its implications for psychophysical performance , 1994, Nature.

[10]  André Longtin,et al.  Delayed excitatory and inhibitory feedback shape neural information transmission. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  Michael G Metzen,et al.  Serotonin selectively enhances perception and sensory neural responses to stimuli generated by same-sex conspecifics , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  J. Poulet,et al.  Internal brain state regulates membrane potential synchrony in barrel cortex of behaving mice , 2008, Nature.

[13]  Maurice J Chacron,et al.  Population coding by electrosensory neurons. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  A. Aertsen,et al.  Spiking activity propagation in neuronal networks: reconciling different perspectives on neural coding , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  L. Maler,et al.  Neural maps in the electrosensory system of weakly electric fish , 2014, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[16]  H. B. Barlow,et al.  Possible Principles Underlying the Transformations of Sensory Messages , 2012 .

[17]  G. P. Moore,et al.  Neuronal spike trains and stochastic point processes. II. Simultaneous spike trains. , 1967, Biophysical journal.

[18]  M. Häusser,et al.  Integration of quanta in cerebellar granule cells during sensory processing , 2004, Nature.

[19]  Joseph G. Hoffman,et al.  Physical Techniques in Biological Research , 1963 .

[20]  S. Salzberg,et al.  Non-classical receptive field mediates switch in a sensory neuron ’ s frequency tuning , 2022 .

[21]  A. Pouget,et al.  Neural correlations, population coding and computation , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  John Hertz,et al.  Cross-Correlations in High-Conductance States of a Model Cortical Network , 2010, Neural Computation.

[23]  Maurice J Chacron,et al.  Nonlinear information processing in a model sensory system. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  A. Borst.  Seeing smells: imaging olfactory learning in bees , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  Leonard Maler,et al.  Burst-Induced Anti-Hebbian Depression Acts through Short-Term Synaptic Dynamics to Cancel Redundant Sensory Signals , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  L. Maler,et al.  The posterior lateral line lobe of certain gymnotoid fish: Quantitative light microscopy , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[27]  Michael W. Spratling.  Predictive coding as a model of the V1 saliency map hypothesis , 2012, Neural Networks.

[28]  Maurice J. Chacron,et al.  In vivo conditions influence the coding of stimulus features by bursts of action potentials , 2011, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[29]  L. Maler,et al.  Plastic and Nonplastic Pyramidal Cells Perform Unique Roles in a Network Capable of Adaptive Redundancy Reduction , 2004, Neuron.

[30]  H Barlow,et al.  Redundancy reduction revisited , 2001, Network.

[31]  Brent Doiron,et al.  Non-classical receptive field mediates switch in a sensory neuron's frequency tuning , 2003, Nature.

[32]  L. Maler,et al.  Limits of linear rate coding of dynamic stimuli by electroreceptor afferents. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population , 2005, Nature.

[34]  M. Häusser,et al.  High-fidelity transmission of sensory information by single cerebellar mossy fibre boutons , 2007, Nature.

[35]  Brent Doiron,et al.  The Spatial Structure of Stimuli Shapes the Timescale of Correlations in Population Spiking Activity , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[36]  Nathaniel N. Urban,et al.  Balanced Synaptic Input Shapes the Correlation between Neural Spike Trains , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[37]  Leonard Maler,et al.  Frequency-Tuned Cerebellar Channels and Burst-Induced LTD Lead to the Cancellation of Redundant Sensory Inputs , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  W. Newsome,et al.  The Variable Discharge of Cortical Neurons: Implications for Connectivity, Computation, and Information Coding , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  M. Chacron,et al.  Neural heterogeneities and stimulus properties affect burst coding in vivo , 2010, Neuroscience.

[40]  Maurice J Chacron,et al.  Receptive Field Organization Determines Pyramidal Cell Stimulus-Encoding Capability and Spatial Stimulus Selectivity , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Leonard Maler,et al.  Preparing for the unpredictable: adaptive feedback enhances the response to unexpected communication signals. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  L. Maler,et al.  An atlas of the brain of the electric fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus , 1991, Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy.

[43]  Brent Doiron,et al.  Parallel Processing of Sensory Input by Bursts and Isolated Spikes , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  André Longtin,et al.  Cellular and circuit properties supporting different sensory coding strategies in electric fish and other systems , 2012, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[45]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Synergy, Redundancy, and Independence in Population Codes , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  P. Dayan,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S9 References the Asynchronous State in Cortical Circuits , 2022 .

[47]  Leonard Maler,et al.  Transient signals trigger synchronous bursts in an identified population of neurons. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  C. I. De Zeeuw,et al.  Timing in the cerebellum: oscillations and resonance in the granular layer , 2009, Neuroscience.

[49]  J. Bastian,et al.  The role of amino acid neurotransmitters in the descending control of electroreception , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[50]  Brent Doiron,et al.  Neural Correlation Is Stimulus Modulated by Feedforward Inhibitory Circuitry , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  Patrick McGillivray,et al.  Parallel coding of first and second order stimulus attributes , 2012, BMC Neuroscience.

[52]  André Longtin,et al.  Efficient computation via sparse coding in electrosensory neural networks , 2011, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[53]  M. Cohen,et al.  Measuring and interpreting neuronal correlations , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[54]  Sheila Nirenberg,et al.  Decoding neuronal spike trains: How important are correlations? , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  Maurice J Chacron,et al.  Sparse and dense coding of natural stimuli by distinct midbrain neuron subpopulations in weakly electric fish. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[56]  Maurice J Chacron,et al.  Feedback and Feedforward Control of Frequency Tuning to Naturalistic Stimuli , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  K. Harris.  Neural signatures of cell assembly organization , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[58]  Nathaniel B Sawtell,et al.  Neural mechanisms for filtering self-generated sensory signals in cerebellum-like circuits , 2011, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[59]  K. Frank,et al.  CHAPTER 2 – MICROELECTRODES FOR RECORDING AND STIMULATION , 1964 .

[60]  Michael G Metzen,et al.  Weakly electric fish display behavioral responses to envelopes naturally occurring during movement: implications for neural processing , 2014, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[61]  Jude F. Mitchell,et al.  Spatial Attention Decorrelates Intrinsic Activity Fluctuations in Macaque Area V4 , 2009, Neuron.

[62]  R. Romo,et al.  Correlated Neuronal Discharges that Increase Coding Efficiency during Perceptual Discrimination , 2003, Neuron.

[63]  M. A. MacIver,et al.  Prey capture in the weakly electric fish Apteronotus albifrons: sensory acquisition strategies and electrosensory consequences. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[64]  J O Hollinger,et al.  Quantitative light microscopy. A powerful tool to assess bone. , 1994, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[65]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Circuits for Local and Global Signal Integration in Primary Visual Cortex , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[66]  Daeyeol Lee,et al.  Effects of noise correlations on information encoding and decoding. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[67]  Brent Doiron,et al.  A Dynamic Dendritic Refractory Period Regulates Burst Discharge in the Electrosensory Lobe of Weakly Electric Fish , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[68]  Maurice J Chacron,et al.  Effects of restraint and immobilization on electrosensory behaviors of weakly electric fish. , 2009, ILAR journal.

[69]  Greg Wayne,et al.  A temporal basis for predicting the sensory consequences of motor commands in an electric fish , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[70]  André Longtin,et al.  Coding Conspecific Identity and Motion in the Electric Sense , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[71]  Michael W. Spratling.  Predictive coding as a model of biased competition in visual attention , 2008, Vision Research.

[72]  J L Gallant,et al.  Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. , 2000, Science.

[73]  Peter Dayan,et al.  The Effect of Correlated Variability on the Accuracy of a Population Code , 1999, Neural Computation.

[74]  A. Aertsen,et al.  Dynamics of neuronal interactions in monkey cortex in relation to behavioural events , 1995, Nature.

[75]  Maurice J Chacron,et al.  Temporal processing across multiple topographic maps in the electrosensory system. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[76]  Maurice J Chacron,et al.  Sparse coding of natural communication signals in midbrain neurons , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[77]  Maurice J Chacron,et al.  SK channels gate information processing in vivo by regulating an intrinsic bursting mechanism seen in vitro. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[78]  Rüdiger Krahe,et al.  Statistics of the Electrosensory Input in the Freely Swimming Weakly Electric Fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[79]  G. P. Moore,et al.  Neuronal spike trains and stochastic point processes. I. The single spike train. , 1967, Biophysical journal.

[80]  J. Bastian,et al.  Plasticity of feedback inputs in the apteronotid electrosensory system. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[81]  Maurice J Chacron,et al.  Electroreceptor neuron dynamics shape information transmission , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[82]  A. Aertsen,et al.  On the significance of correlations among neuronal spike trains , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[83]  J. Gallant,et al.  Natural Stimulation of the Nonclassical Receptive Field Increases Information Transmission Efficiency in V1 , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[84]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[85]  André Longtin,et al.  Modeling cancelation of periodic inputs with burst-STDP and feedback , 2013, Neural Networks.