Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society One Incidental probability judgments from very few samples

We test whether people are able to reason based on inciden- tally acquired probabilistic and context-specific magnitude information. We manipulated variance of values drawn from two normal distributions as participants perform an unrelated counting task. Our results show that people do learn category- specific information incidentally, and that the pattern of their judgments is broadly consistent with normative Bayesian rea- soning at the cohort level, but with large individual-level variability. We find that this variability is explained well by a fru- gal memory sampling approximation; observer models making this assumption explain approximately 70% of the vari- ation in participants’ responses. We also find that behavior while judging easily discriminable categories is consistent with a model observer drawing fewer samples from memory, while behavior while judging less discriminable categories is better fit by models drawing more samples from memory. Thus, our model-based analysis additionally reveals resource-rationality in memory sampling.

[1]  P. Hancock,et al.  Quantifying the qualities of language , 2020, PloS one.

[2]  Nick Chater,et al.  The Bayesian Sampler: Generic Bayesian Inference Causes Incoherence in Human Probability Judgments , 2020, Psychological review.

[3]  Edward Vul,et al.  How effective is incidental learning of the shape of probability distributions? , 2017, Royal Society Open Science.

[4]  Adam N. Sanborn,et al.  Bayesian Brains without Probabilities , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Rational Use of Cognitive Resources: Levels of Analysis Between the Computational and the Algorithmic , 2015, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[6]  A. Pouget,et al.  Probabilistic brains: knowns and unknowns , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  F Gregory Ashby,et al.  The impact of category separation on unsupervised categorization , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[8]  B. Love,et al.  The myth of computational level theory and the vacuity of rational analysis , 2011, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[9]  Charles Kemp,et al.  How to Grow a Mind: Statistics, Structure, and Abstraction , 2011, Science.

[10]  N. Chater,et al.  Précis of Bayesian Rationality: The Probabilistic Approach to Human Reasoning , 2009, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  Charles Kemp,et al.  The discovery of structural form , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  V. Sloutsky,et al.  What's behind different kinds of kinds: effects of statistical density on learning and representation of categories. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  Wei Ji Ma,et al.  Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Optimal Predictions in Everyday Cognition , 2006, Psychological science.

[15]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Decision by sampling , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  K. Sailor,et al.  Is memory for stimulus magnitude Bayesian? , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning , 2004, Nature.

[18]  David H. Brainard,et al.  What makes a categorization task difficult? , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[20]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Prototypes in category learning: the effects of category size, category structure, and stimulus complexity. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Roberto Malinow,et al.  Persistent protein kinase activity underlying long-term potentiation , 1988, Nature.

[22]  L Hasher,et al.  Automatic processing of fundamental information: the case of frequency of occurrence. , 1984, The American psychologist.

[23]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Induction of category distributions: a framework for classification learning. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  Paul R. Schrater,et al.  Frugal preference formation , 2014, CogSci.

[25]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The Adaptive Nature of Human Categorization , 1991 .