“Object Categorization: Reversals and Explanations of the Basic-Level Advantage” (Rogers & Patterson, 2007): A simplicity account

T. T. Rogers and K. Patterson (2007), in their article “Object Categorization: Reversals and Explanations of the Basic-Level Advantage” (Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 451–469), reported an impressive set of results demonstrating a reversal of the highly robust basic-level advantage both in patients with semantic dementia and in healthy individuals engaged in a speeded categorization task. To explain their results, as well as the usual basic-level advantage seen in healthy individuals, the authors employed a parallel distributed processing theory of conceptual knowledge. In this paper, we introduce an alternative way of explaining the results of Rogers and Patterson, which is premised on a more restricted set of assumptions born from standard categorization theory. Specifically, we provide evidence that their results can be accounted for based on the predictions of the simplicity model of unsupervised categorization.

[1]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  Control over the time course of cognition in the tempo-naming task. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Koen Lamberts,et al.  The time course of categorization. , 1998 .

[3]  E. Warrington.  Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology the Selective Impairment of Semantic Memory the Selective Impairment of Semantic Memory , 2022 .

[4]  K. Lamberts.  Feature sampling in categorization and recognition of objects , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[5]  J. Hodges,et al.  Semantic dementia: clinical, radiological and pathological perspectives , 2000, Journal of Neurology.

[6]  Jacob Feldman,et al.  Minimization of Boolean complexity in human concept learning , 2000, Nature.

[7]  H. Brownell,et al.  Category differentiation in object recognition: typicality constraints on the basic category advantage. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  T. Rogers,et al.  Object recognition under semantic impairment: The effects of conceptual regularities on perceptual decisions , 2003 .

[9]  D. Medin,et al.  SUSTAIN: a network model of category learning. , 2004, Psychological review.

[10]  N. Chater.  The Search for Simplicity: A Fundamental Cognitive Principle? , 1999 .

[11]  Christine D. Wilson,et al.  Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  J. Fodor.  The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[13]  Nick Chater,et al.  Unsupervised Categorization and Category Learning , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  M. Gluck,et al.  Explaining Basic Categories: Feature Predictability and Information , 1992 .

[15]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Perceived Shape Similarity among Unfamiliar Objects and the Organization of the Human Object Vision Pathway , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. , 1997, Psychological review.

[17]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  A voxel‐based morphometry study of semantic dementia: Relationship between temporal lobe atrophy and semantic memory , 2000, Annals of neurology.

[18]  H. Barlow.  Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information: David Marr. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1982. pp. xvi + 397 , 1983 .

[19]  I. D. Hill,et al.  An Efficient and Portable Pseudo‐Random Number Generator , 1982 .

[20]  E. Wisniewski,et al.  Prior knowledge and functionally relevant features in concept learning. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Lucy S. Petro,et al.  Dynamics of Visual Information Integration in the Brain for Categorizing Facial Expressions , 2007, Current Biology.

[22]  William M. Rand,et al.  Objective Criteria for the Evaluation of Clustering Methods , 1971 .

[23]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Turning up the noise or turning down the volume? On the nature of the impairment of episodic recognition memory by midazolam. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  L. Komatsu.  Recent views of conceptual structure , 1992 .

[25]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation. , 2004, Psychological review.

[26]  Thomas J. Palmeri,et al.  An Exemplar-Based Random Walk Model of Speeded Classification , 1997 .

[27]  Gregory V. Jones.  Identifying basic categories. , 1983 .

[28]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Pictures and names: Making the connection , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  G. Murphy,et al.  The Big Book of Concepts , 2002 .

[30]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  David L. Faigman,et al.  Human category learning. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[32]  A. Wills,et al.  Processes of overall similarity sorting in free classification. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  D L Medin,et al.  Comment on "Memory storage and retrieval processes in category learning". , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[34]  Richard N A Henson,et al.  A single-system account of the relationship between priming, recognition, and fluency. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  Nick Chater,et al.  A NON-PARAMETRIC APPROACH TO SIMPLICITY CLUSTERING , 2007, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[36]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[37]  Gregory Ashby,et al.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. , 1998, Psychological review.

[38]  Timothy T. Rogers,et al.  NATURAL SELECTION: THE IMPACT OF SEMANTIC IMPAIRMENT ON LEXICAL AND OBJECT DECISION , 2004, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[39]  Emmanuel M. Pothos,et al.  One or two dimensions in spontaneous classification: A simplicity approach , 2008, Cognition.

[40]  F. Gosselin,et al.  Why do we SLIP to the basic level? Computational constraints and their implementation. , 2001, Psychological review.

[41]  Tim D. Fryer,et al.  Declarative memory impairments in Alzheimer's disease and semantic dementia , 2006, NeuroImage.

[42]  M. Ross Quillian,et al.  Retrieval time from semantic memory , 1969 .

[43]  Paul D. Allopenna,et al.  The locus of knowledge effects in concept learning. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[44]  Paul Schedl,et al.  The locus of , 1984 .

[45]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[46]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The Adaptive Nature of Human Categorization , 1991 .

[47]  J. Hodges,et al.  Charting the progression in semantic dementia: implications for the organisation of semantic memory. , 1995 .

[48]  B. Malt,et al.  Category Coherence in Cross-Cultural Perspective , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[49]  Emmanuel M. Pothos,et al.  The Simplicity and Power model for inductive inference , 2006, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[50]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Semantic Cognition: A Parallel Distributed Processing Approach , 2004 .

[51]  Nick Chater,et al.  A simplicity principle in unsupervised human categorization , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[52]  Nick Chater,et al.  Reconciling simplicity and likelihood principles in perceptual organization. , 1996, Psychological review.

[53]  Richard Freeman,et al.  Building object representations from parts: Tests of a stochastic sampling model. , 1999 .

[54]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Basic-level superiority in picture categorization , 1982 .

[55]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[56]  Emmanuel M. Pothos,et al.  Measuring category intuitiveness in unconstrained categorization tasks , 2011, Cognition.

[57]  D. Medin,et al.  The role of theories in conceptual coherence. , 1985, Psychological review.

[58]  K. Lamberts.  Information-accumulation theory of speeded categorization. , 2000, Psychological review.

[59]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[60]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Knowledge partitioning in categorization: Boundary conditions , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[61]  T. Rogers,et al.  Object categorization: reversals and explanations of the basic-level advantage. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[62]  Koen Lamberts,et al.  Categorization under time pressure. , 1995 .

[63]  Nick Chater,et al.  Why cognitive science is not formalized folk psychology , 1995, Minds and Machines.