Adaptive Morphology for Multi-Modal Locomotion

There is a growing interest in using robots in dangerous environments, such as for exploration, search-and-rescue or monitoring applications, in order to reduce the risks for workers or rescuers and to improve their efficiency. Typically, flying robots offer the possibility to quickly explore large areas while ground robots can thoroughly search specific regions of interest. While existing robotic solutions are very promising, they are often limited to specific use cases or environments. This makes them impractical for most missions involving complex or unpredictable scenarios, such as search-and-rescue applications. This limitation comes from the fact that existing robots usually exploit only a single locomotion strategy, which limits their flexibility and adaptability to different environments. In this thesis, a multi-modal locomotion strategy is investigated as a way to increase the versatility of mobile robots. We explore integrated design approaches, where the same actuators and structure are used for different modes of locomotion, which allows a minimization of the weight and complexity of the robot. This strategy is challenging because a single locomotor system must accommodate the potentially conflicting dynamics of multiple modes of locomotion. Herein, we suggest taking inspiration from nature, in particular the common vampire bat Desmodus rotundus. The goal being to make multiple modes of locomotion dynamically compatible (i.e. have compatible speeds and torques requirements), by optimizing the morphology of the locomotor system and even by adapting the morphology of the robot to a specific mode of locomotion. It is demonstrated in this thesis that the integrated design approach can be effectively implemented on a multi-modal aerial and terrestrial robot, and that two modes of locomotion can be made dynamically compatible by optimizing the morphology. Furthermore, an adaptive morphology is used to increase the efficiency of the different modes of locomotion. A locomotor system used both for walking on the ground and controlling flight, has been successfully implemented on a multi-modal robot, which further has deployable wings to increase its performances on the ground and in the air. By successfully exploiting the concepts of integrated design and adaptive morphology, this robot is capable of hovering, forward flight and ground locomotion. This robot demonstrates a very high versatility compared to state of the art of mobile robots, while having a low complexity.

[1]  M. Labarbera,et al.  A 3-D kinematic analysis of gliding in a flying snake, Chrysopelea paradisi , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[2]  Dario Floreano,et al.  The EPFL jumpglider: A hybrid jumping and gliding robot with rigid or folding wings , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[3]  Roger D. Quinn,et al.  A biologically inspired micro-vehicle capable of aerial and terrestrial locomotion , 2009 .

[4]  B. Remes,et al.  Design, Aerodynamics, and Vision-Based Control of the DelFly , 2009 .

[5]  J. Lovvorn,et al.  Mechanical versus physiological determinants of swimming speeds in diving Brünnich's guillemots. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[6]  Ronald S. Fearing,et al.  Experimental dynamics of wing assisted running for a bipedal ornithopter , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[7]  M. Dickinson,et al.  Biofluiddynamic scaling of flapping, spinning and translating fins and wings , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[8]  David Lentink,et al.  How swifts control their glide performance with morphing wings , 2007 .

[9]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  The selection of mechanical actuators based on performance indices , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[10]  M Kovač,et al.  Launching the AquaMAV: bioinspired design for aerial–aquatic robotic platforms , 2014, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[11]  Dario Floreano,et al.  Towards a Self-Deploying and Gliding Robot , 2010, Flying Insects and Robots.

[12]  Satoshi Tadokoro Rescue Robotics: DDT Project on Robots and Systems for Urban Search and Rescue , 2009 .

[13]  L. Johansson,et al.  Kinematics of diving Atlantic puffins (Fratercula arctica L.): evidence for an active upstroke. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[14]  J. Hermanson,et al.  Terrestrial locomotion of the New Zealand short-tailed bat Mystacina tuberculata and the common vampire bat Desmodus rotundus , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[15]  Dario Floreano,et al.  A flying robot with adaptive morphology for multi-modal locomotion , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[16]  Mujahid Abdulrahim,et al.  Design and analysis of biomimetic joints for morphing of micro air vehicles , 2010, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[17]  C. Pennycuick,et al.  Adapting skeletal muscle to be efficient , 1992 .

[18]  A. Ijspeert,et al.  From Swimming to Walking with a Salamander Robot Driven by a Spinal Cord Model , 2007, Science.

[19]  Dario Floreano,et al.  RoboGen: Robot Generation through Artificial Evolution , 2014, ALIFE.

[20]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  A Review of Morphing Aircraft , 2011 .

[21]  Jean-Christophe Zufferey,et al.  Toward indoor flying robots , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[22]  Paul Y. Oh,et al.  Autonomous hovering of a fixed-wing micro air vehicle , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[23]  J. Rayner,et al.  Ecological Morphology and Flight in Bats (Mammalia; Chiroptera): Wing Adaptations, Flight Performance, Foraging Strategy and Echolocation , 1987 .

[24]  Matthew Spenko,et al.  Design and experimental validation of HyTAQ, a Hybrid Terrestrial and Aerial Quadrotor , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[25]  Lawrence C. Rome,et al.  Why animals have different muscle fibre types , 1988, Nature.

[26]  S. M. Deban,et al.  A Novel Antipredator Mechanism in Salamanders: Rolling Escape in Hydromantes platycephalus , 1995 .

[27]  J E Bertram,et al.  The dynamics of flight-initiating jumps in the common vampire bat Desmodus rotundus. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[28]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  Towards Autonomous Indoor Micro VTOL , 2005, Auton. Robots.

[29]  T. Teichmann,et al.  Dynamics of Flight: Stability and Control , 1959 .

[30]  J. Socha Kinematics: Gliding flight in the paradise tree snake , 2002, Nature.

[31]  Masayuki Inaba,et al.  MUWA: Multi-field universal wheel for air-land vehicle with quad variable-pitch propellers , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[32]  S C Burgess,et al.  Multi-modal locomotion: from animal to application , 2013, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[33]  J. Hermanson,et al.  Biomechanics: Independent evolution of running in vampire bats , 2005, Nature.

[34]  Dario Floreano,et al.  Flying over the reality gap: From simulated to real indoor airships , 2006, Auton. Robots.

[35]  Geoffrey A. Hollinger,et al.  Search and pursuit-evasion in mobile robotics , 2011, Auton. Robots.

[36]  Metin Sitti,et al.  MultiMo-Bat: A biologically inspired integrated jumping–gliding robot , 2014, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[37]  Severin Leven Enabling Large-Scale Collective Systems in Outdoor Aerial Robotics , 2011 .

[38]  V. Tucker The energetic cost of moving about. , 1975, American Scientist.

[39]  Peter Ifju,et al.  Flexible-wing-based Micro Air Vehicles , 2002 .

[40]  A. J. Gaston,et al.  Auks: Alcidae , 2018, Urban Ornithology.

[41]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Mobile robots in mine rescue and recovery , 2009, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[42]  Dario Floreano,et al.  A Collision‐resilient Flying Robot , 2014, J. Field Robotics.

[43]  Ephrahim Garcia,et al.  Morphing unmanned aerial vehicles , 2011 .

[44]  Adam Klaptocz,et al.  Design of Flying Robots for Collision Absorption and Self-Recovery , 2012 .

[45]  Kyle H. Elliott,et al.  High flight costs, but low dive costs, in auks support the biomechanical hypothesis for flightlessness in penguins , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Kazuya Yoshida,et al.  Emergency response to the nuclear accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plants using mobile rescue robots , 2013, J. Field Robotics.

[47]  Nikolaos Papanikolopoulos,et al.  Design of an improved land/air miniature robot , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[48]  Chinnapat Thipyopas Aerodynamic Comparison of Tilt-Rotor, -Wing and -Body Concept for Multi Task MAVs , 2008 .

[49]  Paolo Dario,et al.  Jumping like an insect: Design and dynamic optimization of a jumping mini robot based on bio-mimetic inspiration , 2012 .

[50]  John E A Bertram,et al.  Testing the hindlimb-strength hypothesis: non-aerial locomotion by Chiroptera is not constrained by the dimensions of the femur or tibia , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[51]  Matthew Spenko,et al.  Robots on the Move: Versatility and Complexity in Mobile Robot Locomotion , 2013, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[52]  Jean-Marc Moschetta,et al.  Equilibrium Transition Study for a Hybrid MAV , 2011 .

[53]  I. Hunter,et al.  A comparison of muscle with artificial actuators , 1992, Technical Digest IEEE Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop.

[54]  Ravi Vaidyanathan,et al.  Impact of Marine Locomotion Constraints on a Bio-inspired Aerial-Aquatic Wing: Experimental Performance Verification , 2014 .

[55]  Dario Floreano,et al.  A bioinspired multi-modal flying and walking robot , 2015, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.