Absence of a mere-exposure effect in older and younger adults.

The mere-exposure effect, in which repeated stimuli are liked more than novel stimuli, is a well-known effect. However, little research has studied adult age differences in mere-exposure effects, despite possible applications in helping older adults transition to new living environments. Here, we report four experiments assessing mere-exposure to neutral-face stimuli in groups of older and younger adult participants tested online. In each experiment, repeated face exposure did not increase liking within either age group; rather, Bayesian evidence favored the null hypothesis of no effect. Older adults reported higher overall liking ratings relative to younger adults, and both groups preferred younger faces, though this tendency was stronger in the younger group. Further exploratory analysis considering factors such as gender or race of the faces and participants did not reveal any consistent results for the mere-exposure effect. We discuss these findings in relation to other recent studies reporting mixed evidence for mere-exposure effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

[1]  Rocco Palumbo,et al.  When twice is better than once: increased liking of repeated items influences memory in younger and older adults , 2021, BMC psychology.

[2]  Andrée-Ann Cyr,et al.  Web-Based Cognitive Testing of Older Adults in Person Versus at Home: Within-Subjects Comparison Study , 2021, JMIR aging.

[3]  R. Dean,et al.  Making the Unfamiliar Familiar: The Effect of Exposure on Ratings of Unfamiliar Musical Chords , 2020, Musicae Scientiae.

[4]  Leaf Van Boven,et al.  Salience theory of mere exposure: Relative exposure increases liking, extremity, and emotional intensity. , 2020, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Lisa K. Fazio,et al.  The Effect of Repetition on Truth Judgments Across Development , 2019, Psychological science.

[6]  D. Memmert,et al.  Examining effects of preconscious mere exposure: An inattentional blindness approach , 2019, Consciousness and Cognition.

[7]  B. Macnamara,et al.  The role of deliberate practice in expert performance: revisiting Ericsson, Krampe & Tesch-Römer (1993) , 2019, Royal Society Open Science.

[8]  Paul-Christian Bürkner,et al.  Ordinal Regression Models in Psychology: A Tutorial , 2019, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science.

[9]  J. Gray,et al.  PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy , 2019, Behavior Research Methods.

[10]  G. Abakoumkin Mere Exposure Effects in the Real World: Utilizing Natural Experiment Features from the Eurovision Song Contest , 2018, Basic and Applied Social Psychology.

[11]  Kazuya Inoue,et al.  The mere exposure effect for visual image , 2018, Memory & cognition.

[12]  Paul-Christian Bürkner,et al.  Advanced Bayesian Multilevel Modeling with the R Package brms , 2017, R J..

[13]  Stefan Palan,et al.  Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments , 2017 .

[14]  Paul-Christian Bürkner,et al.  brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan , 2017 .

[15]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Are You Smiling, or Have I Seen You Before? Familiarity Makes Faces Look Happier , 2017, Psychological science.

[16]  Jack L. Vevea,et al.  A Re-Examination of the Mere Exposure Effect: The Influence of Repeated Exposure on Recognition, Familiarity, and Liking , 2017, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  B. Newell,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Multiple Context Mere Exposure: Examining the Limits of Liking , 2022 .

[18]  S. Sala,et al.  The decline effect: How initially strong results tend to decrease over time , 2015, Cortex.

[19]  B. Buchsbaum,et al.  Recency, Repetition, and the Multidimensional Basis of Recognition Memory , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Jonathan W Schooler,et al.  Turning the Lens of Science on Itself , 2014, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[21]  B. Newell,et al.  Eliminating the mere exposure effect through changes in context between exposure and test , 2013, Cognition & emotion.

[22]  P. Reber The neural basis of implicit learning and memory: A review of neuropsychological and neuroimaging research , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  M. Phelan,et al.  Mere Exposure to Bad Art , 2013 .

[24]  T. Stafford,et al.  Memory Enhances the Mere Exposure Effect , 2012 .

[25]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs , 2012 .

[26]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Is the Web as good as the lab? Comparable performance from Web and lab in cognitive/perceptual experiments , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[27]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Spaced retrieval: absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  Natalie C. Ebner,et al.  Age of face matters: Age-group differences in ratings of young and old faces , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[29]  M. Gluck,et al.  Learning and Memory: From Brain to Behavior , 2007 .

[30]  Gloria L. Brandburg Making the transition to nursing home life: a framework to help older adults adapt to the long-term care environment. , 2007, Journal of gerontological nursing.

[31]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[32]  B. Scholl,et al.  The Automaticity of Visual Statistical Learning Statistical Learning , 2005 .

[33]  Cynthia P. May,et al.  Implicit memory, age, and time of day: paradoxical priming effects. , 2005, Psychological science.

[34]  Denise C. Park,et al.  A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[35]  M. Linden,et al.  Normal Mere Exposure Effect with Impaired Recognition in Alzheimer's Disease , 2002, Cortex.

[36]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Frequency processing: A twenty-five year perspective. , 2002 .

[37]  D. Kahn Making the Best of It: Adapting to the Ambivalence of a Nursing Home Environment , 1999, Qualitative health research.

[38]  E. Winograd,et al.  The mere exposure effect in patients with Alzheimer's disease. , 1999, Neuropsychology.

[39]  D. Schacter,et al.  Priming and the Brain , 1998, Neuron.

[40]  Robert J. Crutcher,et al.  The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. , 1993 .

[41]  C. Wiggs Aging and memory for frequency of occurrence of novel, visual stimuli: direct and indirect measures. , 1993, Psychology and aging.

[42]  R. Bornstein,et al.  Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  G. Bodenhausen Stereotypes as Judgmental Heuristics: Evidence of Circadian Variations in Discrimination , 1990 .

[44]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Effects of aging on source monitoring: differences in susceptibility to false fame. , 1990, Psychology and aging.

[45]  R. Bornstein Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[46]  Donald G. Dutton,et al.  Experiences of Falling in Love , 1989 .

[47]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Frequency and the Conference of Referential Validity. , 1977 .

[48]  J. Horne,et al.  A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. , 1976, International journal of chronobiology.

[49]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[50]  D. Hebb Distinctive features of learning in the higher animal , 1961 .