Frontoparietal Representations of Task Context Support the Flexible Control of Goal-Directed Cognition

Cognitive control allows stimulus-response processing to be aligned with internal goals and is thus central to intelligent, purposeful behavior. Control is thought to depend in part on the active representation of task information in prefrontal cortex (PFC), which provides a source of contextual bias on perception, decision making, and action. In the present study, we investigated the organization, influences, and consequences of context representation as human subjects performed a cued sorting task that required them to flexibly judge the relationship between pairs of multivalent stimuli. Using a connectivity-based parcellation of PFC and multivariate decoding analyses, we determined that context is specifically and transiently represented in a region spanning the inferior frontal sulcus during context-dependent decision making. We also found strong evidence that decision context is represented within the intraparietal sulcus, an area previously shown to be functionally networked with the inferior frontal sulcus at rest and during task performance. Rule-guided allocation of attention to different stimulus dimensions produced discriminable patterns of activation in visual cortex, providing a signature of top-down bias over perception. Furthermore, demands on cognitive control arising from the task structure modulated context representation, which was found to be strongest after a shift in task rules. When context representation in frontoparietal areas increased in strength, as measured by the discriminability of high-dimensional activation patterns, the bias on attended stimulus features was enhanced. These results provide novel evidence that illuminates the mechanisms by which humans flexibly guide behavior in complex environments.

[1]  B. Milner Effects of Different Brain Lesions on Card Sorting: The Role of the Frontal Lobes , 1963 .

[2]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[3]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[4]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Visual Working Memory in Prefrontal Cortex of the Macaque , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Transient activation of inferior prefrontal cortex during cognitive set shifting , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  A. Dale,et al.  High‐resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[7]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[8]  J. Cohen,et al.  Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. , 2000, Science.

[9]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[10]  K. C. Anderson,et al.  Single neurons in prefrontal cortex encode abstract rules , 2001, Nature.

[11]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Jeremy R. Reynolds,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Transient and Sustained Cognitive Control during Task Switching , 2003, Neuron.

[13]  R. Passingham,et al.  Prefrontal interactions reflect future task operations , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[15]  S. Bunge How we use rules to select actions: A review of evidence from cognitive neuroscience , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[16]  Nikos K Logothetis,et al.  Interpreting the BOLD signal. , 2004, Annual review of physiology.

[17]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses , 2004, NeuroImage.

[18]  S. Courtney,et al.  Attention and cognitive control as emergent properties of information representation in working memory , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[19]  Marcel Brass,et al.  Selection for Cognitive Control: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study on the Selection of Task-Relevant Information , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Prefrontal cortex and flexible cognitive control: rules without symbols. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  T. Egner,et al.  Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  M. Petrides Lateral prefrontal cortex: architectonic and functional organization , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  K. Berman,et al.  Meta‐analysis of neuroimaging studies of the Wisconsin Card‐Sorting task and component processes , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[24]  David Badre,et al.  Computational and neurobiological mechanisms underlying cognitive flexibility. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Robert Desimone,et al.  Top–Down Attentional Deficits in Macaques with Lesions of Lateral Prefrontal Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  On the Control of Control: The Role of Dopamine in Regulating Prefrontal Function and Working Memory , 2007 .

[28]  Brian E. Granger,et al.  IPython: A System for Interactive Scientific Computing , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[29]  David Badre,et al.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evidence for a Hierarchical Organization of the Prefrontal Cortex , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBLINEAR: A Library for Large Linear Classification , 2008, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[31]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Evidence for a frontoparietal control system revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Dissociable Components of Rule-Guided Behavior Depend on Distinct Medial and Prefrontal Regions , 2009, Science.

[33]  Gemma C. Garriga,et al.  Permutation Tests for Studying Classifier Performance , 2009, 2009 Ninth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[34]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[35]  R. O’Reilly The What and How of prefrontal cortical organization , 2010, Trends in Neurosciences.

[36]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Frontal Cortex and the Discovery of Abstract Action Rules , 2010, Neuron.

[37]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  A Parcellation Scheme for Human Left Lateral Parietal Cortex , 2010, Neuron.

[38]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  P. Goldman-Rakic Circuitry of Primate Prefrontal Cortex and Regulation of Behavior by Representational Memory , 2011 .

[40]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[41]  J. Duncan,et al.  Adaptive Coding of Task-Relevant Information in Human Frontoparietal Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Nipype: A Flexible, Lightweight and Extensible Neuroimaging Data Processing Framework in Python , 2011, Front. Neuroinform..

[43]  Michael Esterman,et al.  Decoding Task-based Attentional Modulation during Face Categorization , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  Theodore P. Zanto,et al.  Causal role of the prefrontal cortex in top-down modulation of visual processing and working memory , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Network Organization of the Human Brain , 2011, Neuron.

[46]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Rapid Transfer of Abstract Rules to Novel Contexts in Human Lateral Prefrontal Cortex , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[47]  Eric L. Denovellis,et al.  Synchronous Oscillatory Neural Ensembles for Rules in the Prefrontal Cortex , 2012, Neuron.

[48]  John-Dylan Haynes,et al.  Distributed Representations of Rule Identity and Rule Order in Human Frontal Cortex and Striatum , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  Marcel Brass,et al.  Challenging a decade of brain research on task switching: Brain activation in the task‐switching paradigm reflects adaptation rather than reconfiguration of task sets , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[50]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. , 2012, Annual review of neuroscience.

[51]  Johan D. Carlin,et al.  Choosing the Rules: Distinct and Overlapping Frontoparietal Representations of Task Rules for Perceptual Decisions , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Confounds in multivariate pattern analysis: Theory and rule representation case study , 2013, NeuroImage.

[53]  Matthew F. S. Rushworth,et al.  Frontal and Parietal Cortical Interactions with Distributed Visual Representations during Selective Attention and Action Selection , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[55]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Multi-task connectivity reveals flexible hubs for adaptive task control , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[56]  N. Sigala,et al.  Dynamic Coding for Cognitive Control in Prefrontal Cortex , 2013, Neuron.

[57]  W. Newsome,et al.  Context-dependent computation by recurrent dynamics in prefrontal cortex , 2013, Nature.

[58]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  The importance of mixed selectivity in complex cognitive tasks , 2013, Nature.

[59]  G. D. Logan Task Switching , 2022 .