Towards the integration of social dominance and spatial structure

My aim was to show how individual-oriented (or artificial life) models may provide an integrative background for the development of theories about dominance by including effects of spatial structure. Dominance interactions are thought to serve two different, contrasting functions: acquisition of high rank and reduction of aggression. The model I present consists of a homogeneous virtual world inhabited by artificial agents whose actions are restricted to grouping and dominance interactions in which the effects of winning and losing are self-reinforcing. The two functions are implemented as strategies to initiate dominance interactions and the intensity of aggression and dominance perception (direct or memory based) are varied experimentally. Behaviour is studied by recording the same behavioural units as in real animals. Ranks appear to differentiate more clearly at high than at low intensity of aggression and also more in the case of direct than of memory-based rank perception. Strong differentiation of rank produces a cascade of unexpected effects that differ depending on which function is implemented: for instance, a decline in aggression, spatial centrality of dominants and a correlation between rank and aggression. Insight into the origination of these self-organized patterns leads to new hypotheses for the study of the social behaviour of real animals. Copyright 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

[1]  F Villa,et al.  New computer architectures as tools for ecological thought. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  S. P. Rose,et al.  Rise of neurogenetic determinism , 1997, Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992). Supplement.

[3]  F. Guinness,et al.  Conflict between red deer hinds: the winner always wins , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  T. Schjelderup-Ebbe,et al.  Beiträge zur Sozialpsychologie des Haushuhns. , 1922 .

[5]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing artificial societies , 1996 .

[6]  B. Thierry,et al.  Feedback loop between kinship and dominance: the macaque model. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Self-Reinforcing Dominance Interactions Between Virtual Males and Females. Hypothesis Generation for Primate Studies , 2000, Adaptive Behavior.

[8]  I. Bernstein,et al.  The social component of dominance relationships in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  T. Rowell The concept of social dominance. , 1974, Behavioral biology.

[10]  S. Manuck,et al.  Social Status, Environment, and Atherosclerosisin Cynomolgus Monkeys , 1982, Arteriosclerosis.

[11]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Spatial Centrality of Dominants Without Positional Preference , 1998 .

[12]  Jens Krause DIFFERENTIAL FITNESS RETURNS IN RELATION TO SPATIAL POSITION IN GROUPS , 1994, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[13]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[14]  Y. Hochberg A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance , 1988 .

[15]  Shuichi Matsumura,et al.  A game model for dominance relations among group-living animals , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[16]  Robert H. Berk Assignment Methods in Combinatorial Data Analysis , 1989 .

[17]  A. Guhl,et al.  Social inertia and social stability in chickens. , 1968, Animal behaviour.

[18]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Collective patterns and decision-making , 1989 .

[19]  G. W. Schuett Body size and agonistic experience affect dominance and mating success in male copperheads , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  R. Caldwell Recognition, signalling and reduced aggression between former mates in a stomatopod , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  C. Schaik Why Are Diurnal Primates Living in Groups , 1983 .

[22]  Stewart W. Wilson,et al.  From Animals to Animats 5. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior , 1997 .

[23]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Great Ape Societies: Reciprocation in apes: from complex cognition to self-structuring , 1996 .

[24]  B. Thierry,et al.  Patterns of agonistic interactions in three species of macaque (Macaca mulatta, M. fascicularis, M. tonkeana) , 1985 .

[25]  C. Hemelrijk An individual–orientated model of the emergence of despotic and egalitarian societies , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Allan Mazur,et al.  A Biosocial Model of Status in Face-to-Face Primate Groups , 1985 .

[27]  D. E. Matthews Evolution and the Theory of Games , 1977 .

[28]  R. Trivers The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[29]  C. Drews THE CONCEPT AND DEFINITION OF DOMINANCE IN ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR , 1993 .

[30]  A. Peter Klimley,et al.  Schooling in Sphyrna lewini, a Species with Low Risk of Predation: a Non‐egalitarian State , 1985 .

[31]  Maja J. Matarić,et al.  Dominance interactions, spatial dynamics and emergent reciprocity in a virtual world , 1996 .

[32]  J. Atema,et al.  Individual recognition and memory in lobster dominance , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al.  Winner and loser effects and the structure of dominance hierarchies , 1997 .

[34]  Kanti V. Mardia,et al.  Statistics of Directional Data , 1972 .

[35]  R. Yerkes,et al.  Great Apes , 1929 .

[36]  Ivan D. Chase,et al.  The sequential analysis of aggressive acts during hierarchy formation: an application of the ‘jigsaw puzzle’ approach , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  M. Pagel,et al.  Peck orders and group size in laying hens: `futures contracts' for non-aggression , 1997, Behavioural Processes.

[38]  W. Hamilton Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[39]  Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al.  Game Theory and Animal Behavior , 2000 .

[40]  J. Kaplan,et al.  Social organization in a group of free-ranging patas monkeys. , 1980, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[41]  E. Kravitz,et al.  Serotonin and aggressive motivation in crustaceans: altering the decision to retreat. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  B A Huberman,et al.  Evolutionary games and computer simulations. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  S. Austad Game theory and the evolution of animal contests , 1989 .

[44]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Models of, and tests for, reciprocity, unidirectionality and other social interaction patterns at a group level , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[45]  C. Goulet,et al.  Conflict Outcome in Male Green Swordtail Fish Dyads (Xiphophorus Helleri): Interaction of Body Size, Prior Dominance/Subordination Experience, and Prior Residency , 1996 .

[46]  M. Whitehouse Experience influences male–male contests in the spider Argyrodes antipodiana (Theridiidae: Araneae) , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[47]  C. Barnard,et al.  Dominance hierarchies and the evolution of "individual recognition". , 1979, Journal of theoretical biology.

[48]  J. Gartlan Structure and function in primate society. , 1968, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[49]  Jane Goodall,et al.  Great Ape Societies: Minds , 1996 .

[50]  J. Krause The effect of 'Schreckstoff' on the shoaling behaviour of the minnow: a test of Hamilton's selfish herd theory , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[51]  P. Hogeweg,et al.  Socioinformatic processes: MIRROR modelling methodology , 1985 .

[52]  Lee Ellis,et al.  Reproductive and interpersonal aspects of dominance and status , 1996 .

[53]  C. Janson Social correlates of individual spatial choice in foraging groups of brown capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[54]  B. Ginsburg,et al.  Some Effects of Conditioning on Social Dominance and Subordination in Inbred Strains of Mice , 1942, Physiological Zoology.

[55]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Cooperation Without Genes, Games Or Cognition , 1997 .

[56]  M. Lindauer Ethology. , 1962, Annual review of psychology.

[57]  B. Thierry,et al.  Social development in three species of macaque ( Macaca mulatta , M. fascicularis , M. tonkeana ): A preliminary report on the first ten weeks of life , 1985, Behavioural Processes.

[58]  R. Levins The strategy of model building in population biology , 1966 .

[59]  Paulien Hogeweg,et al.  Mirror Beyond Mirror: Puddles of Life , 1987, ALIFE.

[60]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  A matrix partial correlation test used in investigations of reciprocity and other social interaction patterns at group level , 1990 .

[61]  Sally P. Mendoza,et al.  Behavioral processes leading to linear status hierarchies following group formation in rhesus monkeys , 1983 .

[62]  N. E. Van de Poll,et al.  Aggressive behaviour in rats: Effects of winning or losing on subsequent aggressive interactions , 1982, Behavioural Processes.

[63]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Mathematical model of self-organizing hierarchies in animal societies , 1996 .

[64]  Sandra L. Vehrencamp,et al.  A model for the evolution of despotic versus egalitarian societies , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[65]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  Understanding intelligence , 2020, Inequality by Design.

[66]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up , 1996 .

[67]  Inman Harvey,et al.  Fourth European Conference on Artificial Life , 1997 .

[68]  L. L. Wolf,et al.  The winner and loser effect: integrating multiple experiences , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[69]  G. Parker,et al.  Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.

[70]  H. Drummond,et al.  Dominance between booby nestlings involves winner and loser effects , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[71]  R. Rose,et al.  Behavioral and environmental events influencing primate testosterone levels , 1974 .

[72]  J. Mckenna The Evolution of Allomothering Behavior Among Colobine Monkeys: Function and Opportunism in Evolution , 1979 .

[73]  Patricia R. Barchas Social hierarchies : essays toward a sociophysiological perspective , 1984 .

[74]  Jean-Arcady Meyer,et al.  Risk Sensitive and Ambiguity Reducing Dominance Interactions in a Virtual Laboratory. , 1998 .

[75]  E. Kravitz,et al.  Biogenic amines and aggression: experimental approaches in crustaceans. , 1997, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[76]  O P Judson,et al.  The rise of the individual-based model in ecology. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[77]  Paulien Hogeweg,et al.  A model study on biomorphological description , 1974, Pattern Recognit..

[78]  S. Mendoza,et al.  Social cohesion : essays toward a sociophysiological perspective , 1986 .

[79]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Effects of Cohesiveness on Inter-sexual Dominance Relationships and Spatial Structure among Group-Living Virtual Entities , 1999, ECAL.

[80]  S. Frank Foundations of Social Evolution , 2019 .

[81]  S. B. Datta,et al.  Effects of Group Demography on Dominance Relationships Among Female Primates. I. Mother-Daughter and Sister-Sister Relations , 1991, The American Naturalist.