Autonomy Infused Teleoperation with Application to BCI Manipulation

Robot teleoperation systems face a common set of challenges including latency, low-dimensional user commands, and asymmetric control inputs. User control with BrainComputer Interfaces (BCIs) exacerbates these problems through especially noisy and erratic low-dimensional motion commands due to the difficulty in decoding neural activity. We introduce a general framework to address these challenges through a combination of computer vision, user intent inference, and arbitration between the human input and autonomous control schemes. Adjustable levels of assistance allow the system to balance the operator’s capabilities and feelings of comfort and control while compensating for a task’s difficulty. We present experimental results demonstrating significant performance improvement using the shared-control assistance framework on adapted rehabilitation benchmarks with two subjects implanted with intracortical brain-computer interfaces controlling a seven degree-of-freedom robotic manipulator as a prosthetic. Our results further indicate that shared assistance mitigates perceived user difficulty and even enables successful performance on previously infeasible tasks. We showcase the extensibility of our architecture with applications to quality-of-life tasks such as opening a door, pouring liquids from containers, and manipulation with novel objects in densely cluttered environments.

[1]  Ivan E. Sutherland,et al.  Sketchpad a Man-Machine Graphical Communication System , 1899, Outstanding Dissertations in the Computer Sciences.

[2]  R. Lyle A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research , 1981, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[3]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. , 1985, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[4]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Motion and force control of robot manipulators , 1986, Proceedings. 1986 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  Richard Volpe,et al.  A theoretical and experimental investigation of explicit force control strategies for manipulators , 1993, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[6]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation , 1994 .

[7]  Brenan J. McCarragher,et al.  Human integration into robot control utilising potential fields , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Fredrik Rehnmark,et al.  Robonaut: NASA's Space Humanoid , 2000, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[9]  D. Kortenkamp,et al.  Adjustable control autonomy for manned space flight , 2000, 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8484).

[10]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  Virtual Fixtures for Robotic Cardiac Surgery , 2001, MICCAI.

[11]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Characterizing efficiency of human robot interaction: a case study of shared-control teleoperation , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[12]  Gregory D. Hager,et al.  Spatial motion constraints: theory and demonstrations for robot guidance using virtual fixtures , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[13]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control , 2003 .

[14]  Holly A. Yanco,et al.  Blending human and robot inputs for sliding scale autonomy , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[15]  Redwan Alqasemi,et al.  Telemanipulation Assistance Based on Motion Intention Recognition , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[16]  Jonathan Kofman,et al.  Teleoperation of a robot manipulator using a vision-based human-robot interface , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[17]  Reinhard Koch,et al.  Nonlinear Body Pose Estimation from Depth Images , 2005, DAGM-Symposium.

[18]  Danica Kragic,et al.  Adaptive Virtual Fixtures for Machine-Assisted Teleoperation Tasks , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[19]  Mandayam A. Srinivasan,et al.  Continuous shared control for stabilizing reaching and grasping with brain-machine interfaces , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Andrew B. Schwartz,et al.  Brain-Controlled Interfaces: Movement Restoration with Neural Prosthetics , 2006, Neuron.

[21]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  Maximum Entropy Inverse Reinforcement Learning , 2008, AAAI.

[22]  Jun Nakanishi,et al.  Operational Space Control: A Theoretical and Empirical Comparison , 2008, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[23]  Ashutosh Saxena,et al.  Robotic Grasping of Novel Objects using Vision , 2008, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[24]  N. Yozbatiran,et al.  A Standardized Approach to Performing the Action Research Arm Test , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[25]  Danica Kragic,et al.  Motion intention recognition in robot assisted applications , 2008, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[26]  G. Oriolo,et al.  Robotics: Modelling, Planning and Control , 2008 .

[27]  Andrew S. Whitford,et al.  Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding , 2008, Nature.

[28]  Alexander Toshev,et al.  Shape-based object recognition in videos using 3D synthetic object models , 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[29]  Siddhartha S. Srinivasa,et al.  Planning-based prediction for pedestrians , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[30]  Martin Buss,et al.  Position and force augmentation in a telepresence system and their effects on perceived realism , 2009, World Haptics 2009 - Third Joint EuroHaptics conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems.

[31]  Redwan Alqasemi,et al.  Control of a 9-DoF Wheelchair-Mounted Robotic Arm System , 2023, Proceedings of the 20th Florida Conference on Recent Advances in Robotics.

[32]  J. P. Lewis Fast Normalized Cross-Correlation , 2010 .

[33]  John D. Simeral,et al.  Continuous Control of the DLR Light-Weight Robot III by a Human with Tetraplegia Using the BrainGate2 Neural Interface System , 2010, ISER.

[34]  Quoc V. Le,et al.  Learning to grasp objects with multiple contact points , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[35]  Michael J. Black,et al.  Neural control of cursor trajectory and click by a human with tetraplegia 1000 days after implant of an intracortical microelectrode array , 2011 .

[36]  Kris K. Hauser,et al.  Assisted Teleoperation Strategies for Aggressively Controlling a Robot Arm with 2D Input , 2011, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[37]  Nicolas Y. Masse,et al.  Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm , 2012, Nature.

[38]  Martial Hebert,et al.  An integrated system for autonomous robotics manipulation , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[39]  Zhao Wang,et al.  How Autonomy Impacts Performance and Satisfaction: Results From a Study With Spinal Cord Injured Subjects Using an Assistive Robot , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[40]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Strategies for human-in-the-loop robotic grasping , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[41]  A. Schwartz,et al.  High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia , 2013, The Lancet.

[42]  Kris K. Hauser,et al.  Recognition, prediction, and planning for assisted teleoperation of freeform tasks , 2012, Autonomous Robots.

[43]  Siddhartha S. Srinivasa,et al.  A policy-blending formalism for shared control , 2013, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[44]  J. Andrew Bagnell,et al.  Closed-loop Servoing using Real-time Markerless Arm Tracking , 2013 .

[45]  Abdeslam Boularias,et al.  Efficient Optimization for Autonomous Robotic Manipulation of Natural Objects , 2014, AAAI.

[46]  J. Andrew Bagnell,et al.  Perceiving, learning, and exploiting object affordances for autonomous pile manipulation , 2013, Auton. Robots.

[47]  Richard A. Andersen,et al.  A collaborative BCI approach to autonomous control of a prosthetic limb system , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[48]  Nitish V. Thakor,et al.  Demonstration of a Semi-Autonomous Hybrid Brain–Machine Interface Using Human Intracranial EEG, Eye Tracking, and Computer Vision to Control a Robotic Upper Limb Prosthetic , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[49]  M L Boninger,et al.  Ten-dimensional anthropomorphic arm control in a human brain−machine interface: difficulties, solutions, and limitations , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[50]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Springer Handbook of Robotics , 2007, Springer Handbooks.