U Can Touch This: How Tablets Can Be Used to Study Cognitive Development

New technological devices, particularly those with touch screens, have become virtually omnipresent over the last decade. Practically from birth, children are now surrounded by smart phones and tablets. Despite being our constant companions, little is known about whether these tools can be used not only for entertainment, but also to collect reliable scientific data. Tablets may prove particularly useful for collecting behavioral data from those children (1–10 years), who are, for the most part, too old for studies based on looking times and too young for classical psychophysical testing. Here, we analyzed data from six studies that utilized touch screen tablets to deliver experimental paradigms in developmental psychology. In studies 1 and 2, we employed a simple sorting and recall task with children from the ages of 2–8. Study 3 (ages 9 and 10) extended these tasks by increasing the difficulty of the stimuli and adding a staircase-based perception task. A visual search paradigm was used in study 4 (ages 2–5), while 1- to 3-year-olds were presented with an extinction learning task in study 5. In study 6, we used a simple visuo-spatial paradigm to obtain more details about the distribution of reaction times on touch screens over all ages. We collected data from adult participants in each study as well, for comparison purposes. We analyzed these data sets in regard to four metrics: self-reported tablet usage, completeness of data, accuracy of responses and response times. In sum, we found that children from the age of two onwards are very capable of interacting with tablets, are able to understand the respective tasks and are able to use tablets to register their answers accordingly. Results from all studies reiterated the advantages of data collection through tablets: ease of use, high portability, low-cost, and high levels of engagement for children. We illustrate the great potential of conducting psychological studies in young children using tablets, and also discuss both methodological challenges and their potential solutions.

[1]  C. Floccia,et al.  A methodological investigation of the Intermodal Preferential Looking paradigm: Methods of analyses, picture selection and data rejection criteria. , 2015, Infant behavior & development.

[2]  C. Nelson,et al.  Neurobehavioral evidence for working‐memory deficits in school‐aged children with histories of prematurity , 1999, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[3]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  Domain-specific development of face memory but not face perception. , 2014, Developmental science.

[4]  Nor Azah Abdul Aziz,et al.  Selection of touch gestures for children's applications , 2013, 2013 Science and Information Conference.

[5]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Using Tablets to Collect Data From Young Children , 2016 .

[6]  H. Bulf,et al.  How a Hat May Affect 3-Month-Olds' Recognition of a Face: An Eye-Tracking Study , 2013, PloS one.

[7]  Kirsten A. Dalrymple,et al.  The Dartmouth Database of Children’s Faces: Acquisition and Validation of a New Face Stimulus Set , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  P. Zelazo,et al.  Resistance to extinction: A measure of orbitofrontal function suitable for children? , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[9]  Experience with headwear influences the other-race effect in 4-year-old children. , 2015, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[10]  Skyler T. Hawk,et al.  Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database , 2010 .

[11]  A. Burton,et al.  The Glasgow Face Matching Test , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[12]  Denise C. Park,et al.  A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[13]  Todd M. Gureckis,et al.  CUNY Academic , 2016 .

[14]  Juan Pablo Hourcade,et al.  Multitouch tablet applications and activities to enhance the social skills of children with autism spectrum disorders , 2012, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[15]  A. Bremner,et al.  Parental Reports on Touch Screen Use in Early Childhood , 2015, PloS one.

[16]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Extrinsic rewards undermine altruistic tendencies in 20-month-olds. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[17]  Susan Evans,et al.  Incloodle: Evaluating an Interactive Application for Young Children with Mixed Abilities , 2016, CHI.

[18]  B. Heisele Face Detection , 2001 .

[19]  F. Simion,et al.  Face detection in complex visual displays: an eye-tracking study with 3- and 6-month-old infants and adults. , 2012, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[20]  Michelle M. Neumann,et al.  An examination of touch screen tablets and emergent literacy in Australian pre-school children , 2014 .

[21]  A. Meltzoff Infant Imitation After a 1-Week Delay: Long-Term Memory for Novel Acts and Multiple Stimuli. , 1988, Developmental psychology.

[22]  Dimitri A Christakis,et al.  Interactive media use at younger than the age of 2 years: time to rethink the American Academy of Pediatrics guideline? , 2014, JAMA pediatrics.

[23]  Leslie J. Couse,et al.  A Tablet Computer for Young Children? Exploring its Viability for Early Childhood Education , 2010 .