Design and evaluation of a wireless magnetic-based proximity detection platform for indoor applications

Many indoor sensing applications leverage knowledge of relative proximity among physical objects and humans, such as the notion of "within arm's reach". In this paper, we quantify this notion using "proximity zone", and propose a methodology that empirically and systematically compare the proximity zones created by various wireless technologies. We find that existing technologies such as 802.15.4, Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), and RFID fall short on metrics such as boundary sharpness, robustness against interference, and obstacle penetration. We then present the design and evaluation of a wireless proximity detection platform based on magnetic induction - LiveSynergy. LiveSynergy provides sweet spot for indoor applications that require reliable and precise proximity detection. Finally, we present the design and evaluation of an end-to-end system, deployed inside a large food court to offer context-aware and personalized advertisements and diet suggestions at a per-counter granularity.

[1]  Agathoniki Trigoni,et al.  Revealing the hidden lives of underground animals using magneto-inductive tracking , 2010, SenSys '10.

[2]  Barry Brumitt,et al.  EasyLiving: Technologies for Intelligent Environments , 2000, HUC.

[3]  Andy Hopper,et al.  The active badge location system , 1992, TOIS.

[4]  Romit Roy Choudhury,et al.  Did you see Bob?: human localization using mobile phones , 2010, MobiCom.

[5]  F. Raab,et al.  Magnetic Position and Orientation Tracking System , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[6]  Philip Levis,et al.  The β-factor: measuring wireless link burstiness , 2008, SenSys '08.

[7]  W.B. Heinzelman,et al.  Experimental investigation of radio performance in wireless sensor networks , 2006, 2006 2nd IEEE Workshop on Wireless Mesh Networks.

[8]  Andy Hopper,et al.  The Anatomy of a Context-Aware Application , 2002, Wirel. Networks.

[9]  Paramvir Bahl,et al.  RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[10]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Mapping and localization with RFID technology , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[11]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  The smart floor: a mechanism for natural user identification and tracking , 2000, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[12]  Andreas Terzis,et al.  Surviving wi-fi interference in low power ZigBee networks , 2010, SenSys '10.

[13]  Magdalena Balazinska,et al.  Longitudinal study of a building-scale RFID ecosystem , 2009, MobiSys '09.

[14]  B. Sklar,et al.  Rayleigh fading channels in mobile digital communication systems Part I: Characterization , 1997, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[15]  Andreas Savvides,et al.  Tasking networked CCTV cameras and mobile phones to identify and localize multiple people , 2010, UbiComp.

[16]  Ramesh Raskar,et al.  Bokode: imperceptible visual tags for camera based interaction from a distance , 2009, SIGGRAPH 2009.

[17]  David E. Culler,et al.  Design and implementation of a high-fidelity AC metering network , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[18]  Xiao Zheng,et al.  Radio Characterization of 802.15.4 and Its Impact on the Design of Mobile Sensor Networks , 2008, EWSN.

[19]  Hari Balakrishnan,et al.  6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on on Mobile Computing and Networking (ACM MOBICOM ’00) The Cricket Location-Support System , 2022 .

[20]  Moustafa Youssef,et al.  The Horus WLAN location determination system , 2005, MobiSys '05.