Pricing strategies for the site-dependent vehicle routing problem

The vehicle pricing game (VPG) which addresses the vehicles’ viewpoints within a vehicle routing problem (VRP) is introduced. Each vehicle acts as a player who demands a price per kilometer. That is, vehicles represent decentralized actors in transport systems, e.g., carriers under subcontracts. Based on these prices, a VRP is solved and profits are generated. Which price should a vehicle choose to maximize its own profit, considering the competition among vehicles? To answer this question, site dependencies leading to inhomogeneous vehicles are included. More detailed, skill-levels, e.g., relating to the size of a vehicle, are used to indicate a vehicle’s ability to carry out particular services. Moreover, penalty options are added. The VPG serves as an element of a vertical collaboration in a transport scenario and thus provides decision support for cooperative models. Theoretical results for the VPG are provided for a particular case of a two-player ring network game, for which the full set of equilibria is described and their uniqueness is discussed. It is shown that the uniqueness of the higher-skilled vehicle’s payoff is guaranteed even for multiple equilibria. The competition ratio is defined; it restricts a vehicle’s price to keep its competitiveness. Moreover, the acceptance ratio gives a lower bound on prices such that a loss of market share is still accepted. Experimental results are provided for general networks including the analysis of penalty options. It is demonstrated that strict site dependencies by tendency lead to monopolistic structures. In addition, particular penalty types show a positive effect regarding load imbalances caused by universally skilled vehicles.

[1]  Winfried Hochstättler,et al.  The Simulated Trading Heuristic for Solving Vehicle Routing Problems , 1996, Discret. Appl. Math..

[2]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  Efficient Routing Algorithms for Multiple Vehicles With no Explicit Communications , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[3]  Joseph N. Prashker,et al.  The applicability of non-cooperative game theory in transport analysis , 2006 .

[4]  Bruce L. Golden,et al.  A Computational Study Of A New Heuristic For The Site-Dependent Vehicle Routing Problem , 1999 .

[5]  Michael G.H. Bell Games, Heuristics, and Risk Averseness in Vehicle Routing Problems , 2004 .

[6]  Bernd Scholz-Reiter,et al.  A distributed routing concept for vehicle routing problems , 2009, Logist. Res..

[7]  Peter Värbrand,et al.  On the nucleolus of the basic vehicle routing game , 1996, Math. Program..

[8]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Truthful mechanisms for one-parameter agents , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing.

[9]  Stefan Voß,et al.  Improved load balancing and resource utilization for the Skill Vehicle Routing Problem , 2013, Optim. Lett..

[10]  Peter Värbrand,et al.  The Heterogeneous Vehicle - Routing Game , 2004, Transp. Sci..

[11]  Luís Gouveia,et al.  The Skill Vehicle Routing Problem , 2011, INOC.

[12]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  Pricing in Dynamic Vehicle Routing Problems , 2007, Transp. Sci..

[13]  Gilbert Laporte,et al.  A Tabu Search Algorithm For The Site Dependent Vehicle Routing Problem With Time Windows , 2001 .

[14]  Maria Grazia Scutellà,et al.  Home Care optimization: impact of pattern generation policies on scheduling and routing decisions , 2013, Electron. Notes Discret. Math..

[15]  Luís Gouveia,et al.  Models and valid inequalities to asymmetric skill-based routing problems , 2013, EURO J. Transp. Logist..

[16]  Xin Wang,et al.  Collaborative transportation planning of less-than-truckload freight , 2014, OR Spectr..

[17]  B. Karimi,et al.  Pricing for freight carriers in a competitive environment: A game theory approach , 2011 .

[18]  Selvaprabu Nadarajah,et al.  Less-Than-Truckload carrier collaboration problem: modeling framework and solution approach , 2013, J. Heuristics.

[19]  J. Nash,et al.  NON-COOPERATIVE GAMES , 1951, Classics in Game Theory.