Stimulus-response compatibility and sequential learning in the serial reaction time task

The serial reaction time (SRT) task is a commonly used paradigm to investigate implicit learning. In most studies the settings originally introduced by Nissen and Bullemer are replicated, i.e., subjects respond to a visuo-spatial sequence of stimulus locations by pressing spatially compatible arranged keys. The present experiment was designed to explore to what degree the sequential learning observed under these conditions depends on the use of locational sequences. Under otherwise identical conditions, first the S-R compatibility was reduced by using symbols instead of locations as stimuli, and second, the “connectibility,” i.e, the ease of connecting successive stimuli into coherent pattern, was varied. Effects on reaction times (RT) in the SRT task and on explicit memory in a generation task were evaluated. The results indicate that the connectibility of the stimuli has no effect at all and that S-R compatibility influences only the general RT level but does not seem to modify the learning process itself. Thus, the data are more consistent with the notion that learning is based primarily on the sequence of responses rather than on the sequence of stimuli. Moreover, a post hoc classification of subjects with regard to the amount of explicit sequence knowledge they have acquired reveals a striking modification of the general result: The RT difference between responses to locations and symbols vanishes in the course of learning for the complete explicit knowledge group. In order to account for this effect, we presume that the response control of these subjects shifts from stimuli to motor programs, so that RTs become increasingly independent of the stimuli used.

[1]  P. Frensch,et al.  Implicit learning of unique and ambiguous serial transitions in the presence and absence of a distractor task. , 1994 .

[2]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. , 1967, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Learning the structure of event sequences. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Attention as a Cognitive and Neural System , 1992 .

[5]  Michael A. Stadler,et al.  Implicit serial learning: Questions inspired by Hebb (1961) , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[6]  Frank Restle,et al.  Theory of Serial Pattern Learning: Structural Trees. , 1970 .

[7]  D J Povel,et al.  Structural factors in patterned finger tapping. , 1982, Acta psychologica.

[8]  U. Mayr,et al.  Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Steven W. Keele,et al.  Movement control in skilled motor performance. , 1968 .

[10]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  A case study of mental imagery deficit , 1988, Brain and Cognition.

[11]  M. Amorim,et al.  Conscious knowledge and changes in performance in sequence learning: evidence against dissociation. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  M. A. Stadler,et al.  Role of attention in implicit learning. , 1995 .

[13]  Michael Ziessler,et al.  The programming of structural properties of movement sequences , 1988, Zeitschrift fur Psychologie mit Zeitschrift fur angewandte Psychologie.

[14]  M. Posner,et al.  Attentional Mechanisms and Conscious Experience , 1992 .

[15]  P. J. Jennings,et al.  Attention in the representation of sequence: Experiment and theory ☆ , 1992 .

[16]  Richard I. Ivry,et al.  Attention and structure in sequence learning. , 1990 .

[17]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Reactions toward the source of stimulation. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  David A. Caulton,et al.  On the Modularity of Sequence Representation , 1995 .

[19]  R. A. Carlson,et al.  A case of syntactical learning and judgment: How conscious and how abstract? , 1984 .

[20]  M. Ziessler The impact of motor responses on serial-pattern learning , 1994, Psychological research.

[21]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[22]  Joachim Hoffmann,et al.  Implicit learning of loosely defined structures , 1998 .

[23]  M. Nissen,et al.  Implicit learning of new verbal associations. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[25]  Tim Curran,et al.  Attentional and Nonattentional Forms of Sequence Learning , 1993 .

[26]  D A Rosenbaum,et al.  Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[28]  M. A. Stadler,et al.  On learning complex procedural knowledge. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  Dirk-Jan Povel,et al.  Theory of serial pattern production: Tree traversals. , 1982 .

[30]  Unbewusstes Lernen―eine besondere Lernform? , 1993 .

[31]  P. Lewicki,et al.  Self-perpetuating development of encoding biases. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[32]  A. Reber Implicit learning of synthetic languages: The role of instructional set. , 1976 .

[33]  D. Howard,et al.  Serial pattern learning by event observation. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  Arthur S. Reber,et al.  Cognition Unawares. (Book Reviews: Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge. An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious.) , 1996 .

[35]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  S-R compatibility and response selection , 1995 .

[36]  A. Reber Implicit learning of artificial grammars , 1967 .

[37]  Pierre Perruchet,et al.  Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge? Journal of , 1990 .

[38]  M M Smyth,et al.  Interference in immediate spatial memory , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[39]  Michael A. Stadler,et al.  Statistical structure and implicit serial learning. , 1992 .

[40]  Peter Bullemer,et al.  On the development of procedural knowledge. , 1989 .

[41]  Dianne C. Berry,et al.  Implicit Learning , 1993 .

[42]  M. Smyth,et al.  Movement and Working Memory: Patterns and Positions in Space , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[43]  Pierre Perruchet,et al.  Association between conscious knowledge and performance in normal subjects: reply to Cohen and Curran (1993) and Willingham, Greeley, and Bardone (1993) , 1993 .

[44]  J. Richard Hanley,et al.  Impairment of the Visuo-Spatial Sketch Pad , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[45]  Arthur S. Reber,et al.  Analogic and abstraction strategies in synthetic grammar learning: A functionalist interpretation , 1978, Cognition.

[46]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[47]  A. Reber Implicit learning and tacit knowledge , 1993 .

[48]  P. Frensch,et al.  Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[49]  R H Logie,et al.  Visuospatial working memory, movement control and executive demands. , 1995, British journal of psychology.

[50]  D. Shanks,et al.  Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[51]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Mechanisms of Implicit Learning: Connectionist Models of Sequence Processing , 1993 .

[52]  A. Healy,et al.  Long-term repetition effects for motoric and perceptual procedures. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[53]  Peder J. Johnson,et al.  Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. , 1994 .

[54]  R. Logie Visuo-spatial Working Memory , 1994 .