Spatial frequency, phase, and the contrast of natural images.

We examined contrast sensitivity and suprathreshold apparent contrast with natural images. The spatial-frequency components within single octaves of the images were removed (notch filtered), their phases were randomized, or the polarity of the images was inverted. Of Michelson contrast, root-mean-square (RMS) contrast, and band-limited contrast, RMS contrast was the best index of detectability. Negative images had lower apparent contrast than their positives. Contrast detection thresholds showed spatial-frequency-dependent elevation following both notch filtering and phase randomization. The peak of the spatial-frequency tuning function was approximately 0.5-2 cycles per degree (c/deg). Suprathreshold contrast matching functions also showed spatial-frequency-dependent contrast loss for both notch-filtered and phase-randomized images. The peak of the spatial-frequency tuning function was approximately 1-3 c/deg. There was no detectable difference between the effects of phase randomization and notch filtering on contrast sensitivity. We argue that these observations are consistent with changes in the activity within spatial-frequency channels caused by the higher-order phase structure of natural images that is responsible for the presence of edges and specularities.

[1]  E. Kretzmer.  Statistics of television signals , 1952 .

[2]  F. Attneave.  Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[3]  D. G. Green,et al.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  O. Bryngdahl,et al.  Characteristics of the visual system. Psychophysical measurements of the response to spatial sine-wave stimuli in the photopic region. , 1966, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[5]  A. Watanabe,et al.  Spatial sine-wave responses of the human visual system. , 1968, Vision research.

[6]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  N. Graham,et al.  Detection of grating patterns containing two spatial frequencies: a comparison of single-channel and multiple-channels models. , 1971, Vision research.

[9]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Stimulus specificity in the human visual system. , 1973, Vision research.

[10]  F A Bilsen,et al.  The influence of the number of cycles upon the visual contrast threshold for spatial sine wave patterns. , 1974, Vision research.

[11]  J. Nachmias,et al.  Discrimination of simple and complex gratings , 1975, Vision Research.

[12]  D. H. Kelly.  Spatial frequency selectivity in the retina , 1975, Vision Research.

[13]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  J. Kulikowski,et al.  Effective contrast constancy and linearity of contrast sensation , 1976, Vision Research.

[15]  R. Hess,et al.  The functional area for summation to threshold for sinusoidal gratings , 1978, Vision Research.

[16]  Mark W. Cannon,et al.  Contrast sensation: A linear function of stimulus contrast , 1979, Vision Research.

[17]  D. Burr.  Sensitivity to spatial phase , 1980, Vision Research.

[18]  S. Laughlin.  A Simple Coding Procedure Enhances a Neuron's Information Capacity , 1981, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Section C, Biosciences.

[19]  A.V. Oppenheim,et al.  The importance of phase in signals , 1980, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[20]  L N Piotrowski,et al.  A Demonstration of the Visual Importance and Flexibility of Spatial-Frequency Amplitude and Phase , 1982, Perception.

[21]  I Rentschler,et al.  Modelling perceptual distortion: amplitude and phase transmission in the human visual system. , 1982, Human neurobiology.

[22]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina , 1982, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[23]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  D. O. Bowker,et al.  Suprathreshold spatiotemporal response characteristics of the human visual system. , 1983, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[25]  D. Badcock.  Spatial phase or luminance profile discrimination? , 1984, Vision Research.

[26]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Contrast matching data predicted from contrast increment thresholds , 1984, Vision Research.

[27]  D. Badcock.  How do we discriminate relative spatial phase? , 1984, Vision Research.

[28]  Ingo Rentschler,et al.  Loss of spatial phase relationships in extrafoveal vision , 1985, Nature.

[29]  M C Morrone,et al.  Recognition of Positive and Negative Bandpass-Filtered Images , 1986, Perception.

[30]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  The physical limits of grating visibility , 1987, Vision Research.

[31]  B. Timney,et al.  Changes in perceived contrast of suprathreshold gratings as a function of orientation and spatial frequency. , 1987, Spatial vision.

[32]  G. J. Burton,et al.  Color and spatial structure in natural scenes. , 1987, Applied optics.

[33]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[34]  M. Banks,et al.  Sensitivity loss in odd-symmetric mechanisms and phase anomalies in peripheral vision , 1987, Nature.

[35]  Mark A. Georgeson,et al.  Comparison of contrast responses across spatial mechanisms , 1988, Vision Research.

[36]  D. Burr,et al.  Feature detection in human vision: a phase-dependent energy model , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[37]  D. Burr,et al.  Discrimination of spatial phase in central and peripheral vision , 1989, Vision Research.

[38]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes , 1990 .

[39]  E. Peli.  Contrast in complex images. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[40]  B. Moulden,et al.  The Standard Deviation of Luminance as a Metric for Contrast in Random-Dot Images , 1990, Perception.

[41]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays , 1991, Vision Research.

[42]  A. Johnston,et al.  Recognising Faces: Effects of Lighting Direction, Inversion, and Brightness Reversal , 1992, Perception.

[43]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Amplitude spectra of natural images. , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[44]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C, 2nd Edition , 1992 .

[45]  J. H. van Hateren,et al.  Real and optimal neural images in early vision , 1992, Nature.

[46]  William Bialek,et al.  Statistics of Natural Images: Scaling in the Woods , 1993, NIPS.

[47]  J. Rovamo,et al.  The effects of grating area and spatial frequency on contrast sensitivity as a function of light level , 1993, Vision Research.

[48]  D. Brainard,et al.  Efficiency in detection of isoluminant and isochromatic interference fringes. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[49]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Both the phase and the amplitude spectrum may determine the appearance of natural images , 1993, Vision Research.

[50]  Jyrki Rovamo,et al.  Contrast matching of two-dimensional compound gratings , 1994, Vision Research.

[51]  D. Field,et al.  What's constant in contrast constancy? The effects of scaling on the perceived contrast of bandpass patterns , 1995, Vision Research.

[52]  Walter Makous,et al.  Zero frequency masking and a model of contrast sensitivity , 1995, Vision Research.

[53]  J. H. van Hateren,et al.  Modelling the Power Spectra of Natural Images: Statistics and Information , 1996, Vision Research.

[54]  R Kemp,et al.  Perception and Recognition of Normal and Negative Faces: The Role of Shape from Shading and Pigmentation Cues , 1996, Perception.

[55]  Walter Makous,et al.  Implicit masking constrained by spatial inhomogeneities , 1997, Vision Research.

[56]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[57]  J. H. Hateren,et al.  Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex , 1998 .

[58]  Avi Chaudhuri,et al.  Are There Qualitative Differences between Face Processing in Photographic Positive and Negative? , 1998, Perception.

[59]  D H Foster,et al.  Human Sensitivity to Phase Perturbations in Natural Images: A Statistical Framework , 2000, Perception.

[60]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  The human visual system is optimised for processing the spatial information in natural visual images , 2000, Current Biology.

[61]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Discrimination of Spectrally Blended Natural Images: Optimisation of the Human Visual System for Encoding Natural Images , 2000, Perception.

[62]  V. Billock.  Neural acclimation to 1/ f spatial frequency spectra in natural images transduced by the human visual system , 2000 .

[63]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[64]  M. J. Morgan,et al.  The relative importance of local phase and local amplitude in patchwise image reconstruction , 1991, Biological Cybernetics.