Gaming for smallholder participation in the design of more sustainable agricultural landscapes

Smallholder farming systems often consist of a mosaic of interlinked forested and cleared-field patches that together provide a diversity of services to local and non-local stakeholders. Designing and adopting more sustainable farming systems for such mosaic landscapes involves communal decision-making and active participation of local smallholders. Currently, a wide variety of participatory approaches to involve individual farmers in such design processes is available. However, methodologies that address communal decision-making processes as seen in complex smallholder agricultural landscapes are still rare. Here, we present a gaming methodology developed to (i) actively involve farmers in the process of agroecosystem design, and (ii) to identify factors and patterns of communal decision-making through an in-depth analysis of game strategies deployed by participants. At the basis of this methodology is the RESORTES board game; a stylized yet complex land-use game rich in ecological and social outcomes. Results of four pilot sessions in a usufruct community in the buffer zone of a Man and Biosphere Reserve in Chiapas, Mexico, showed that the game sessions created an open and active discussion among participants. Discussions concerned land-use issues in the game and in real-life. It allowed participants that were new to active involvement in communal decision-making to openly discuss and share their ideas. The highly structured monitoring and analysis scheme for ex-ante/ex-post analysis was easy in use and identified communication, leadership and relatedness among participants as influential factors that smoothened the collective decision-making process. The RESORTES board game and related games can shed light on farmer’s actual views on and responses to multifunctional agricultural landscape planning and the land sharing vs. land sparing dilemmas currently in debate in academic and policy-making settings. The findings of this paper can be useful to inform strategies for community involvement in agroecosystem design in a broader set of complex socio-environmental context, using serious game to guide agricultural landscape planning processes.

[1]  E. Ostrom A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997 , 1998, American Political Science Review.

[2]  M. Janssen,et al.  Pastoralists' responses to variation of rangeland resources in time and space. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[3]  Manuela Vieira Pak,et al.  Designing and implementing a Role-Playing Game: A tool to explain factors, decision making and landscape transformation , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[4]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[5]  L. García-Barrios,et al.  An educational simulation tool for negotiating sustainable natural resource management strategies among stakeholders with conflicting interests , 2008 .

[6]  P. K. Thornton,et al.  Smart Investments in Sustainable Food Production: Revisiting Mixed Crop-Livestock Systems , 2010, Science.

[7]  Christophe Le Page,et al.  Co-constructing with stakeholders a role-playing game to initiate collective management of erosive runoff risks at the watershed scale , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[8]  J. Heckman,et al.  Lab Experiments Are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences , 2009, Science.

[9]  Anantha Prasad,et al.  Nature’s matrix: linking agriculture, conservation and food sovereignty , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[10]  S. Berg Snowball Sampling—I , 2006 .

[11]  Ivette Perfecto,et al.  Biodiversity, yield, and shade coffee certification , 2005 .

[12]  M. V. van Ittersum,et al.  Trade-off Analysis for Sustainability Evaluation: A Case Study of the Purhepecha Region, Mexico , 2006 .

[13]  S. Gliessman,et al.  Sustainability and Landscape Multifunctionality , 2011 .

[14]  L. García-Barrios,et al.  Social dilemmas and individual/group coordination strategies in a complex rural land-use game , 2011 .

[15]  E. Ostrom,et al.  WHAT DO PEOPLE BRING INTO THE GAME: EXPERIMENTS IN THE FIELD ABOUT COOPERATION IN THE COMMONS , 2004 .

[16]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World , 2007 .

[17]  O. M. Cerutti,et al.  Assessing the sustainability of small farmer natural resource management systems. A critical analysis of the MESMIS program (1995-2010) , 2012 .

[18]  François Bousquet,et al.  Companion Modeling, Conflict Resolution, and Institution Building: Sharing Irrigation Water in the Lingmuteychu Watershed, Bhutan , 2006 .

[19]  Olivier Barreteau,et al.  Our Companion Modelling Approach , 2003, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[20]  S. Farolfi,et al.  WAT-A-GAME: sharing water and policies in your own basin , 2009 .

[21]  H. Keulen,et al.  From coping to adaptation to economic and institutional change – Trajectories of change in land-use management and social organization in a Biosphere Reserve community, Mexico , 2014 .

[22]  O. Mertz,et al.  Local land use strategies in a globalizing world—managing social and environmental dynamics , 2006 .

[23]  Olivier Barreteau,et al.  Collaborative Modelling as a Boundary Institution to Handle Institutional Complexities in Water Management , 2012 .

[24]  J. Anderies,et al.  Governing the commons: Learning from field and laboratory experiments , 2011 .

[25]  M. Janssen,et al.  Context matters to explain field experiments: Results from Colombian and Thai fishing villages , 2011, Ecological Economics.

[26]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Lab Experiments for the Study of Social-Ecological Systems , 2010, Science.

[27]  R. D. Groot,et al.  The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes , 2010 .

[28]  Jan H. G. Klabbers,et al.  The Magic Circle: Principles of Gaming & Simulation MODELING AND SIMULATIONS FOR LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION , 2008 .

[29]  Richard D. Duke,et al.  Gaming: The Future's Language , 2014 .

[30]  Luis Rico García-Amado,et al.  Efficiency of Payments for Environmental Services: Equity and additionality in a case study from a Biosphere Reserve in Chiapas, Mexico , 2011 .

[31]  Pascal Perez,et al.  Assessment and Monitoring of the Effects of the ComMod Approach , 2014 .

[32]  Ian Scoones,et al.  A trainer's guide for participatory learning and action , 1995 .

[33]  G. Villamor,et al.  Social Role-Play Games Vs Individual Perceptions of Conservation and PES Agreements for Maintaining Rubber Agroforests in Jambi (Sumatra), Indonesia , 2011 .

[34]  A. Yúnez-naude The Dismantling of Conasupo, a Mexican State Trader in Agriculture , 2003 .

[35]  U. Pascual,et al.  Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: A multidisciplinary critique , 2011 .

[36]  U. Netlogo Wilensky,et al.  Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling , 1999 .

[37]  Nicolas Becu,et al.  Participatory computer simulation to support collective decision-making: Potential and limits of stakeholder involvement , 2008 .

[38]  Fred Percival,et al.  A Handbook of Game Design , 1982 .

[39]  Michael Schrage,et al.  Serious Play: How the World's Best Companies Simulate to Innovate , 1999 .

[40]  François Bousquet,et al.  The challenge of understanding decisions in experimental studies of common pool resource governance , 2011 .

[41]  Dietrich Dörner,et al.  The Logic Of Failure: Recognizing And Avoiding Error In Complex Situations , 1997 .

[42]  Ivette Perfecto,et al.  The Future of Farming and Conservation , 2005, Science.

[43]  E. N. Speelman,et al.  Agrodiversity v.2: An educational simulation tool to address some challenges for sustaining functional agrodiversity in agro-ecosystems , 2010 .

[44]  François Bousquet,et al.  An evolving simulation/gaming process to facilitate adaptive watershed management in northern mountainous Thailand , 2007 .

[45]  Christian Kerbiriou,et al.  Role-playing game developed from a modelling process: A relevant participatory tool for sustainable development? A co-construction experiment in an insular biosphere reserve , 2013 .

[46]  Unai Pascual,et al.  Utilizing and conserving agrobiodiversity in agricultural landscapes , 2007 .

[47]  K. Obidzinski,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Local, Social, and Environmental Impacts of Biofuels Environmental and Social Impacts of Oil Palm Plantations and their Implications for Biofuel Production in Indonesia , 2012 .

[48]  Christophe Le Page,et al.  Companion modelling approach: the AtollGame experience in Tarawa atoll (RePublic of Kiribati) , 2005 .

[49]  Elisabeth Huber-Sannwald,et al.  Landscape diversity in a rural territory: Emerging land use mosaics coupled to livelihood diversification , 2013 .

[50]  Luis García-Barrios,et al.  Neotropical Forest Conservation, Agricultural Intensification, and Rural Out-Migration: The Mexican Experience , 2009 .

[51]  Daniel Castillo,et al.  Simulation of common pool resource field experiments: a behavioral model of collective action , 2005 .

[52]  M. Vugt,et al.  Evolutionary Origins of Leadership and Followership , 2006 .

[53]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  The value-added of laboratory experiments for the study of institutions and common-pool resources , 2006 .

[54]  M. A. Sawaya,et al.  Piloting a Non-Invasive Genetic Sampling Method for Evaluating Population-Level Benefits of Wildlife Crossing Structures , 2010 .

[55]  V. Latora,et al.  Complex networks: Structure and dynamics , 2006 .

[56]  M. Janssen Introducing Ecological Dynamics into Common-Pool Resource Experiments , 2010 .

[57]  David De Cremer,et al.  Intergroup and Intragroup Aspects of Leadership in Social Dilemmas: A Relational Model of Cooperation , 2002 .

[58]  Olivier Barreteau,et al.  Multi-agent systems and role games : collective learning processes for ecosystem management , 2002 .

[59]  John M. Antle,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity, contract design, and the efficiency of carbon sequestration policies for agriculture , 2003 .

[60]  Christophe Le Page,et al.  A companion modeling approach applied to fishery management , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[61]  Herman van Keulen,et al.  Heterogeneity and diversity in less-favoured areas , 2006 .

[62]  E. Ostrom Collective action and the evolution of social norms , 2000, Journal of Economic Perspectives.