Spatial contrast sensitivity does not explain random figure discrimination latency

Both humans and other mammals can more easily discriminate eight-sided figures from one another than they can figures having more or fewer sides. The hypothesis that this effect is based upon spatial contrast sensitivity was tested by varying viewing distance and hence spatial frequency content. Because viewing distance had tittle effect upon relative discrimination latency, it was concluded that the superior discriminability of eight-sided figures is not based upon spatial contrast sensitivity. The possibility that orientation tuning of visual cortex neurons may account for the effect is discussed.

[1]  J. Goodman.  Introduction to Fourier optics , 1969 .

[2]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  S. Sherman,et al.  Receptive-field characteristics of neurons in cat striate cortex: Changes with visual field eccentricity. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  F ATTNEAVE,et al.  The quantitative study of shape and pattern perception. , 1956, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Reaction time as a measure of suprathreshold grating detection , 1978, Vision Research.

[6]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  D. R. Brown,et al.  Visual Discrimination: Tree Squirrels and Quantified Stimulus Dimensions , 1962, Perceptual and motor skills.

[8]  D H HUBEL,et al.  RECEPTIVE FIELDS AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE IN TWO NONSTRIATE VISUAL AREAS (18 AND 19) OF THE CAT. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  K. M. Michels,et al.  Quantitative Studies in Form Perception: An Evaluation of the Role of Selected Stimulus Parameters in the Visual Discrimination Performance of Human Subjects , 1962, Perceptual and motor skills.

[10]  D. Tolhurst.  Adaptation to square‐wave gratings: inhibition between spatial frequency channels in the human visual system , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  K. M. Michels,et al.  Squirrel monkeys and discrimination learning: figural interactions, redundancies, and random shapes. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  K. Carlson.  Visual discrimination learning of random figure problems by rhesus monkeys , 1973 .

[13]  D. G. Green,et al.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  D. R. Brown,et al.  Visual and tactual form discrimination: Psychophysical comparison within and between modalities , 1970 .

[15]  Mark W. Cannon,et al.  Contrast sensation: A linear function of stimulus contrast , 1979, Vision Research.