Using Artificial Potential Field Theory for a Cooperative Control Model in a Connected and Automated Vehicles Environment

Artificial potential field (APF) theory has been extensively applied in traffic path planning as an efficient method to avoid collision. However, studies in collision avoidance based on APF theory only considered the movement of single vehicle. In this paper, a vehicle cooperative control model for avoiding collision in the connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs) environment is presented, using APF theory. The proposed model not merely guarantees the travel safety of vehicles in avoiding collision, but also promotes driving comfort and improves traffic efficiency. To verify the cooperative control model, simulations of four scenarios are designed and compared with the human driving environment. Five indicators are selected to evaluate the results, that is, time–space diagram, time mean speed (TMS), the rate of large deceleration time (large deceleration is that deceleration larger than –2 m/s2), the inverse time-to-collision ( TTC − 1 ), and lane-changing times. According to the simulation results, the cooperative control model could alleviate the capacity drop and increase the TMS to improve traffic efficiency, reduce the rate of the large deceleration time to promote driving comfort, and decrease TTC − 1 to promote safety in small and large input flow rates. The results reveal the proposed model is significantly superior to the human driving environment whether in free or congested situations, except for the lane-change times, which are slightly larger.

[1]  Raymond J Kiefer,et al.  Developing an inverse time-to-collision crash alert timing approach based on drivers' last-second braking and steering judgments. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Yang Li,et al.  The Driving Safety Field Based on Driver–Vehicle–Road Interactions , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[3]  Shuai He,et al.  An improved artificial potential field method of trajectory planning and obstacle avoidance for redundant manipulators , 2018, International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems.

[4]  Mehmet Önder Efe,et al.  Path Planning using Model Predictive Controller based on Potential Field for Autonomous Vehicles , 2018, IECON 2018 - 44th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[5]  Yan Liang,et al.  Bearing-Only Obstacle Avoidance Based on Unknown Input Observer and Angle-Dependent Artificial Potential Field , 2018, Sensors.

[6]  R. Rothery,et al.  Detection of the Sign of Relative Motion When following a Vehicle , 1974, Human factors.

[7]  Hong Wang,et al.  A Motion Planning and Tracking Framework for Autonomous Vehicles Based on Artificial Potential Field Elaborated Resistance Network Approach , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[8]  Gao Fei,et al.  An Improved Artificial Potential Field Model Considering Vehicle Velocity for Autonomous Driving , 2018 .

[9]  Keqiang Li,et al.  Driving safety field theory modeling and its application in pre-collision warning system , 2016 .

[10]  Mohd Rizal Arshad,et al.  A Balance-Artificial Potential Field Method for Autonomous Surface Vessel Navigation in Unstructured Riverine Environment☆ , 2015 .

[11]  Esmaeel Khanmirza,et al.  Multi-objective multi-robot path planning in continuous environment using an enhanced genetic algorithm , 2019, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  Jiang Wu,et al.  Tangent navigated robot path planning strategy using particle swarm optimized artificial potential field , 2018 .

[13]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Real-Time Obstacle Avoidance for Manipulators and Mobile Robots , 1985, Autonomous Robot Vehicles.

[14]  Jiaqi Ma,et al.  A mixed traffic speed harmonization model with connected autonomous vehicles , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[15]  Arun Kumar Sangaiah,et al.  Obstacle avoidance of mobile robots using modified artificial potential field algorithm , 2019, Other Conferences.

[16]  Xin Huang,et al.  Active Collision Avoidance for Human-Robot Interaction With UKF, Expert System, and Artificial Potential Field Method , 2018, Front. Robot. AI.

[17]  Wuhong Wang,et al.  A simplified car-following model based on the artificial potential field , 2016 .

[18]  Naoki Shibata,et al.  Model Predictive Obstacle Avoidance Control for Vehicles with Automatic Velocity Suppression using Artificial Potential Field , 2018 .

[19]  Kip Smith,et al.  Pedestrian injury mitigation by autonomous braking. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Mashrur Chowdhury,et al.  A Review of Sensing and Communication, Human Factors, and Controller Aspects for Information-Aware Connected and Automated Vehicles , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[21]  Brent Nelson,et al.  Levels of Aviation Autonomy , 2018, 2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC).

[22]  Joel W. Burdick,et al.  Artificial potential functions for highway driving with collision avoidance , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[23]  Hanna Jeppsson,et al.  Real life safety benefits of increasing brake deceleration in car-to-pedestrian accidents: Simulation of Vacuum Emergency Braking. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  Towards use of Dijkstra Algorithm for Optimal Navigation of an Unmanned Surface Vehicle in a Real-Time Marine Environment with results from Artificial Potential Field , 2018 .

[25]  Amir Khajepour,et al.  Autonomous driving motion planning with obstacles prioritization using lexicographic optimization , 2018, Control Engineering Practice.