A Review on the effects of IoT and Smart Cities Technologies on Urbanism

Internet of Things (IoT) as a new phenomenon is changing other fundamental definitions such as smart cities and urbanism. Based on IoT technology, new smart cities can have more opportunities to provide effective facilities and services for citizens. Urbanism as a multidisciplinary study, which includes urban design, urban planning and management and etc., has always tried to enhance the quality of life in urban environments. The concept of urbanism under the influence of technology is changing efficiently. Combining these 3 concepts can help to design new urban environments that are smart and comfortable for different people categories and also provide trade-off for cross-section categories. This paper surveys challenges from urbanism perspective as the results of integrating these definitions. Different aspects that IoT based Smart cities can interact with urbanism have been investigated. In addition, future directions and issues will be evaluated to determine different aspects of the mixture. Different concepts and challenges that urban designer should consider to provide an appropriate infrastructure for the mixture will be explained as well.

[1]  Alexandre M. Bayen,et al.  Evaluation of traffic data obtained via GPS-enabled mobile phones: The Mobile Century field experiment , 2009 .

[2]  Hsueh-Sheng Chang,et al.  Exploring an integrated method for measuring the relative spatial equity in public facilities in the context of urban parks , 2011 .

[3]  Athena Vakali,et al.  Urban Planning and Smart Cities: Interrelations and Reciprocities , 2012, Future Internet Assembly.

[4]  J. Wareham,et al.  A Smart City Initiative: the Case of Barcelona , 2012, Journal of the Knowledge Economy.

[5]  Agusti Solanas,et al.  The pursuit of citizens' privacy: a privacy-aware smart city is possible , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[6]  R. Kitchin,et al.  The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism , 2013, GeoJournal.

[7]  Anna Corinna Cagliano,et al.  Current trends in Smart City initiatives: some stylised facts , 2014 .

[8]  Adel Said Elmaghraby,et al.  Cyber security challenges in Smart Cities: Safety, security and privacy , 2014, Journal of advanced research.

[9]  Margarita Angelidou,et al.  Smart city policies: A spatial approach , 2014 .

[10]  Maria-Lluïsa Marsal-Llacuna,et al.  Smart Urban Planning: Designing Urban Land Use from Urban Time Use , 2014 .

[11]  Vladlena Benson,et al.  Implications of Social Media Use in Personal and Professional Settings , 2014 .

[12]  Aristides Lopes da Silva,et al.  Health and emergency-care platform for the elderly and disabled people in the Smart City , 2015, J. Syst. Softw..

[13]  Ta Theo Arentze,et al.  A multilevel analysis of factors influencing local social interaction , 2015, Transportation.

[14]  Maria-Lluïsa Marsal-Llacuna,et al.  Lessons in urban monitoring taken from sustainable and livable cities to better address the Smart Cities initiative , 2015 .

[15]  M. Angelidou.  Smart cities: A conjuncture of four forces , 2015 .

[16]  Andrés Monzón,et al.  Smart Cities Concept and Challenges - Bases for the Assessment of Smart City Projects , 2015, SMARTGREENS.

[17]  Adegboyega Ojo,et al.  Exploring the Nature of the Smart Cities Research Landscape , 2016 .

[18]  Tan Yigitcanlar,et al.  Smartness that matters: towards a comprehensive and human-centred characterisation of smart cities , 2016 .

[19]  Meikang Qiu,et al.  Privacy Protection for Preventing Data Over-Collection in Smart City , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[20]  Barbara Lenz,et al.  Taking a Drive, Hitching a Ride: Autonomous Driving and Car Usage , 2016 .

[21]  Daniel Belanche,et al.  City attachment and use of urban services: Benefits for smart cities , 2016 .

[22]  M. Bolívar,et al.  Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance , 2016 .

[23]  Diego Reforgiato Recupero,et al.  An Innovative, Open, Interoperable Citizen Engagement Cloud Platform for Smart Government and Users’ Interaction , 2016, Journal of the Knowledge Economy.

[24]  Yang Chen,et al.  Achieving energy savings by intelligent transportation systems investments in the context of smart cities , 2016 .

[25]  Joshua Zeunert,et al.  Biophilia in urban design: patterns and principles for smart Australian cities , 2016 .

[26]  Tim Heath,et al.  In-between spaces and social interaction: a morphological analysis of Izmir using space syntax , 2016 .

[27]  Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen,et al.  Transport And Health: A Marriage Of Convenience Or An Absolute Necessity. , 2016, Environment international.

[28]  Ahmet Guler,et al.  Smart Public Safety: Application of Mobile Electronic System Integration (MOBESE) in Istanbul , 2016 .

[29]  María M. Guevara,et al.  The urban public space and design as tools to promote social interaction , 2016 .

[30]  Sebastian Glende,et al.  Increasing the Acceptance of Assistive Robots for Older People Through Marketing Strategies Based on Stakeholder Needs , 2016, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[31]  N. Yee,et al.  The Digital Workforce and the Workplace of the Future , 2016 .

[32]  Wann-Ming Wey,et al.  Urban Street Environment Design for Quality of Urban Life , 2016 .

[33]  H. Bahrainy,et al.  Urban Design Definition, Knowledge Base and Principles , 2016 .

[34]  Alessandro Saffiotti,et al.  A Cloud Robotics Solution to Improve Social Assistive Robots for Active and Healthy Aging , 2016, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[35]  Awais Ahmad,et al.  Urban planning and building smart cities based on the Internet of Things using Big Data analytics , 2016, Comput. Networks.

[36]  Robin Effing,et al.  Social Smart City: Introducing Digital and Social Strategies for Participatory Governance in Smart Cities , 2016, EGOV.

[37]  Xiaohui Xie,et al.  An energy-efficient data transmission protocol for mobile crowd sensing , 2017, Peer Peer Netw. Appl..

[38]  O. P. Vyas,et al.  Smart Bike Sharing System to make the City even Smarter , 2017, ArXiv.

[39]  J. V. D. Bergh,et al.  Smart City Projects and Citizen Participation: The Case of London , 2017 .

[40]  Simon Elias Bibri,et al.  Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review , 2017 .

[41]  Jorge Gonçalves,et al.  Human Sensors , 2017, Participatory Sensing, Opinions and Collective Awareness.

[42]  Soonduck Yoo,et al.  Directions and improvements of the future smart city development: a case of Gyenggi province , 2017, Spatial Information Research.

[43]  Rolf König,et al.  Management science in the era of smart consumer products: challenges and research perspectives , 2016, Central European Journal of Operations Research.

[44]  A. While,et al.  Competitive urbanism and the limits to smart city innovation: The UK Future Cities initiative , 2017 .

[45]  Renata Paola Dameri,et al.  Smart City Definition, Goals and Performance , 2017 .

[46]  N. Ravi,et al.  Leveraging Social Networks for Smart Cities: A Case-Study in Mitigation of Air Pollution , 2017 .

[47]  Simon Elias Bibri,et al.  The core enabling technologies of big data analytics and context-aware computing for smart sustainable cities: a review and synthesis , 2017, Journal of Big Data.

[48]  Trent Victor,et al.  When Autonomous Vehicles Are Introduced on a Larger Scale in the Road Transport System: The Drive Me Project , 2017 .

[49]  R. Tiwari.  Levels of Air Pollution in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh , 2017 .

[50]  Jung Hoon Han,et al.  Innovative Civic Engagement and Digital Urban Infrastructure: Lessons from 100 Smart Cities Mission in India , 2017 .

[51]  Alois Knoll,et al.  Smart City-to-Vehicle — Measuring, Prediction, Influencing , 2017 .

[52]  Gabriela Viale Pereira,et al.  Delivering public value through open government data initiatives in a Smart City context , 2017, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[53]  Shalini Garg,et al.  Role of e-trainings in building smart cities , 2017 .

[54]  K. P. Kannan.  India’s labour question is also a social question: inequalizing growth and increasing social equality under neoliberal economic regimes , 2017 .

[55]  Sujata S. Govada,et al.  Smart City Concept and Framework , 2017 .

[56]  Rafael Pous,et al.  Using Augmented Reality and Internet of Things to improve accessibility of people with motor disabilities in the context of Smart Cities , 2017, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[57]  L. Elliott.  Improving social and behavioural functioning in children with autism spectrum disorder: a videogame skills based feasibility trial , 2017 .

[58]  Steven Farber,et al.  Bicycling frequency: a study of preferences and travel behavior in Salt Lake City, Utah , 2017 .

[59]  Da Young Ju,et al.  User Requirement Analysis for Display User Experience in Smart Car , 2017, HCI.

[60]  Anastasia Stratigea,et al.  Spatial Data Management and Visualization Tools and Technologies for Enhancing Participatory e-Planning in Smart Cities , 2017 .

[61]  L. Merola.  The ReCaS Project , 2017 .

[62]  R. Lal,et al.  Spatial Variations of Transport Infrastructure and Urban Development, Himachal Pradesh , 2017 .

[63]  Victoria Z. Lawson,et al.  A New Look at Inequality: Introducing and Testing a Cross-Sectional Equality Measurement Framework in New York City , 2017 .

[64]  Jie Lin,et al.  Smart Transportation Systems: Architecture, Enabling Technologies, and Open Issues , 2017 .

[65]  Alexandros G. Fragkiadakis,et al.  Designing Secure IoT Architectures for Smart City Applications , 2017 .

[66]  Wanlei Zhou,et al.  On-Street Car Parking Prediction in Smart City: A Multi-source Data Analysis in Sensor-Cloud Environment , 2017, SpaCCS Workshops.

[67]  Y. Tang,et al.  The Balance Between Equity and Efficiency in Urban Planning , 2017 .

[68]  Mingshu Wang,et al.  Bike-sharing systems and congestion: Evidence from US cities , 2017 .

[69]  Gerhard Schmitt,et al.  Citizen Design Science: A strategy for crowd-creative urban design , 2018 .

[70]  Tae-Sung Kim,et al.  Security risk assessment framework for smart car using the attack tree analysis , 2017, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing.

[71]  S. H. Mohammadi,et al.  Conflicting perceptions on participation between citizens and members of local government , 2017, Quality & quantity.

[72]  Wael K.M. Alhajyaseen,et al.  Performance evaluation of the inside intersection median-turn lane markings on the mobility and safety performance of signalized intersections in the Philippines and Japan , 2017 .

[73]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Conceptualizing smart service systems , 2017, Electronic Markets.

[74]  Ling Wang,et al.  Analysis of real-time crash risk for expressway ramps using traffic, geometric, trip generation, and socio-demographic predictors. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.