How Difficult is the Task for you? Modelling and Analysis of Students' Task Difficulty Sequences in a Simulation-Based POE Environment

Task difficulty (TD) reflects students' subjective judgement on the complexity of a task. We examine the TDs data of 236 undergraduate students in a simulation-based Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) environment using three different labels easy, medium and hard. Generally, the students who perceive the tasks to be easy or hard perform poorly at the transfer task than the students who perceive the tasks to be medium or moderately difficult. Sequences of students' TDs are analysed which consist of a set of several judgements, collected once for each task in a POE sequence. The analysis suggests that given a sequence of TDs, difficulty level hard followed by a hard may lead to poorer learning outcomes at the transfer task. By contrast, difficulty level medium followed by a medium may lead to better learning outcomes at the transfer task. In terms of the TD models, we identify student behaviours that can be reflective of their perceived difficulties. Generally, the students who report that the tasks are easy, adopt a trial-and-error behaviour where they spend lesser time and make more attempts on tasks. By comparison, the students who complete the tasks in a longer time by making more attempts are likely to report that the following task is hard. For the students who report medium TDs, mostly these students seem to reflect on tasks where they spend a long time and require fewer attempts for task completions. Additionally, these students provide longer texts for explaining their hypothesis reasoning. Understanding how student behaviours and TDs manifest over time and how they impact students' learning outcomes is useful, especially when designing for real-time educational interventions, where the difficulty of the tasks could be optimised for students. It can also help in designing and sequencing the tasks for the development of effective teaching strategies that can maximise students' learning.

[1]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  The Effects of an Interactive Software Agent on Student Affective Dynamics while Using ;an Intelligent Tutoring System , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[2]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications , 1995 .

[3]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Modeling Cognitive-Affective Dynamics with Hidden Markov Models , 2010 .

[4]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  Subtraction by addition , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[5]  Abelardo Pardo,et al.  Improving Learning Analytics - Combining Observational and Self-Report Data on Student Learning , 2017, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[6]  J. B. Olsen,et al.  THE FOUR GENERATIONS OF COMPUTERIZED EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT , 1988 .

[7]  Israel Kibirige,et al.  The Effect of Predict-Observe-Explain Strategy on Learners’ Misconceptions about Dissolved Salts , 2014 .

[8]  Kasia Muldner,et al.  The Impact of Animated Pedagogical Agents on Girls' and Boys' Emotions, Attitudes, Behaviors and Learning , 2011, 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[9]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence, persistence, and impact of learners' cognitive-affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  A. Graesser,et al.  Domain-general problem solving skills and education in the 21st century , 2014 .

[11]  Paul Gorsky,et al.  The role of anomaly and of cognitive dissonance in restructuring students' concepts of force , 1994 .

[12]  Andrew P. Bradley,et al.  The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms , 1997, Pattern Recognit..

[13]  M. Hakel,et al.  Effects of Objective and Subjective Task Complexity on Performance , 1997 .

[14]  G. Kennedy,et al.  All roads lead to Rome: Tracking students’ affect as they overcome misconceptions , 2016 .

[15]  R. Lazarus Cognition and motivation in emotion. , 1991, The American psychologist.

[16]  Timothy J. Fogarty,et al.  The Association between the Directional Accuracy of Self‐Efficacy and Accounting Course Performance , 2002 .

[17]  C. Mead,et al.  Moments of Confusion in Simulation-Based Learning Environments , 2020, J. Learn. Anal..

[18]  P. Skehan 语言学习认知法 = A cognitive approach to language learning , 1998 .

[19]  P. Robinson Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: exploring interactions in a componential framework , 2001 .

[20]  Carla Arnau Font The flow experience , 2016 .

[21]  Darryl W. Schneider,et al.  Asymmetric Switch Costs as Sequential Difficulty Effects , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  D. Campbell Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis , 1988 .

[23]  R. W. Kulhavy Feedback in Written Instruction , 1977 .

[24]  Michael H. Long,et al.  Three Approaches to Task‐Based Syllabus Design , 1992 .

[25]  Kirsten Zimbardi,et al.  Know Thy Student! Combining Learning Analytics and Critical Reflections to Increase Understanding of Students' Self-Regulated Learning in an Authentic Setting , 2015 .

[26]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[27]  Neil T. Heffernan,et al.  Population validity for educational data mining models: A case study in affect detection , 2014, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[28]  D. Posada,et al.  Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of akaike information criterion and bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. , 2004, Systematic biology.

[29]  J. Piaget,et al.  The equilibration of cognitive structures : the central problem of intellectual development , 1985 .

[30]  Patrick Gamsby Boredom , 2018, Emotions, Everyday Life and Sociology.

[31]  K. Yancey Reflection in the writing classroom , 1998 .

[32]  Manu Kapur,et al.  Designing for Productive Failure , 2012 .

[33]  Nikol Rummel,et al.  Productive failure in learning from generation and invention activities , 2012 .

[34]  S. Semken,et al.  Habitable Worlds: Delivering on the Promises of Online Education. , 2018, Astrobiology.

[35]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  The Case of Self-transitions in Affective Dynamics , 2019, AIED.

[36]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Towards Helping Teachers Select Optimal Content for Students , 2019, AIED.

[37]  Peter Robinson,et al.  Cognitive Complexity and Task Sequencing: Studies in a Componential Framework for Second Language Task Design , 2005 .

[38]  J. Krosnick,et al.  Survey research. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[39]  S. Vosniadou Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. , 1994 .

[40]  Richard Gunstone,et al.  A matter of gravity , 1980 .

[41]  R. W. Kulhavy,et al.  Feedback and Response Confidence. , 1976 .

[42]  P. Kariotoglou,et al.  University Students’ Emotions in Lectures: The Effect of Competence Beliefs, Value Beliefs and Perceived Task-difficulty, and the Impact on Academic Performance , 2011 .

[43]  Michael A. Madaio,et al.  Culture in Computer-Based Learning Systems: Challenges and Opportunities , 2020 .

[44]  Kirsten Zimbardi,et al.  Know thy student! Combining learning analytics and critical reflections to develop a targeted intervention for promoting self-regulated learning , 2015, J. Learn. Anal..

[45]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Detecting Learning Strategies with Analytics: Links with Self-reported Measures and Academic Performance , 2017, J. Learn. Anal..

[46]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Modeling Learners' Cognitive, Affective, and Social Processes through Language and Discourse , 2014, J. Learn. Anal..

[47]  M. Guadagnoli,et al.  Challenge Point: A Framework for Conceptualizing the Effects of Various Practice Conditions in Motor Learning , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[48]  R. Baker,et al.  Operationalizing and Detecting Disengagement Within Online Science Microworlds , 2015 .

[49]  Alan W. Black,et al.  Equity Beyond Bias in Language Technologies for Education , 2019, BEA@ACL.

[50]  Scotty D. Craig,et al.  Affect and learning: An exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor , 2004 .

[51]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Question asking and eye tracking during cognitive disequilibrium: Comprehending illustrated texts on devices when the devices break down , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[52]  Jaclyn L. Ocumpaugh,et al.  Who's Learning? Using Demographics in EDM Research , 2020 .

[53]  R. Driver,et al.  The Pupil as Scientist , 1983 .

[54]  P. L. Adams THE ORIGINS OF INTELLIGENCE IN CHILDREN , 1976 .

[55]  J. Berkson Application of the Logistic Function to Bio-Assay , 1944 .

[56]  H. L. Hom,et al.  The impact of task difficulty expectations on intrinsic motivation , 1983 .

[57]  Shamya KARUMBAIAH,et al.  The Implications of a Subtle Difference in the Calculation of Affect Dynamics , 2018 .

[58]  J. Belmont,et al.  The general strategies hypothesis as applied to cognitive theory in mental retardation , 1987 .

[59]  Peter Skehan,et al.  Book Reviews : A Cognitive Approach To Language Learning , 1998 .

[60]  Xuewei Zhang,et al.  Topic modeling for evaluating students' reflective writing: a case study of pre-service teachers' journals , 2016, LAK.

[61]  Amelia Lee,et al.  The role of perceptions of task difficulty in relation to self-perceptions of ability, intrinsic value, attainment value, and performance , 2007 .

[62]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Beyond boredom and anxiety , 1975 .

[63]  J. Eccles,et al.  Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[64]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  The Influence of School Demographics on the Relationship Between Students' Help-Seeking Behavior and Performance and Motivational Measures , 2019, EDM.

[65]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Off-task behavior in the cognitive tutor classroom: when students "game the system" , 2004, CHI.

[66]  J. Eccles Expectancies, values and academic behaviors , 1983 .

[67]  S. Sreerekha,et al.  EFFECT OF PREDICT-OBSERVE-EXPLAIN STRATEGY ON ACHIEVEMENT IN CHEMISTRY OF SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS , 2016 .

[68]  A. Ayas,et al.  Investigating the effectiveness of a POE-based teaching activity on students’ understanding of condensation , 2012 .

[69]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Utilizing Learning Analytics to Map Students' Self-Reported Study Strategies to Click Behaviors in STEM Courses , 2019, LAK.

[70]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life , 1997 .

[71]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Modeling how incoming knowledge, persistence, affective states, and in-game progress influence student learning from an educational game , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[72]  J. Deloache,et al.  Precursors of mnemonic strategies in very young children's memory. , 1985, Child development.

[73]  Tho Lai Mooi Self‐efficacy and Student Performance in an Accounting Course , 2006 .

[74]  D. Paulhus Measurement and control of response bias. , 1991 .

[75]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[76]  A. Graesser,et al.  Dynamics of affective states during complex learning , 2012 .

[77]  Richard Gunstone,et al.  The Process of Conceptual Change in 'Force and Motion'. , 1997 .

[78]  A. Bandura Social learning theory , 1977 .

[79]  Richard S. Lazarus,et al.  Cognition and motivation in emotion. , 1991 .

[80]  Sidney D'Mello,et al.  Confusion and its dynamics during device comprehension with breakdown scenarios. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[81]  Sidney K. D'Mello,et al.  Antecedent-Consequent Relationships and Cyclical Patterns between Affective States and Problem Solving Outcomes , 2009, AIED.

[82]  A. Graesser,et al.  Monitoring Affective Trajectories during Complex Learning , 2007 .

[83]  Peter Robinson,et al.  Cognition and Second Language Instruction: Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: a triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA , 2001 .

[84]  James Dalziel Practical eteaching strategies for predict - observe - explain problem-based learning and role plays , 2010 .

[85]  Phillip M. Mangos,et al.  The Role of Subjective Task Complexity in Goal Orientation, Self-Efficacy, and Performance Relations , 2001 .

[86]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 1990 .