Interactive memory systems in the human brain

Learning and memory in humans rely upon several memory systems, which appear to have dissociable brain substrates. A fundamental question concerns whether, and how, these memory systems interact. Here we show using functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) that these memory systems may compete with each other during classification learning in humans. The medial temporal lobe and basal ganglia were differently engaged across subjects during classification learning depending upon whether the task emphasized declarative or nondeclarative memory, even when the to-be-learned material and the level of performance did not differ. Consistent with competition between memory systems suggested by animal studies and neuroimaging, activity in these regions was negatively correlated across individuals. Further examination of classification learning using event-related FMRI showed rapid modulation of activity in these regions at the beginning of learning, suggesting that subjects relied upon the medial temporal lobe early in learning. However, this dependence rapidly declined with training, as predicted by previous computational models of associative learning.

[1]  Gordon Winocur,et al.  An investigation of paired-associate learning in amnesic patients , 1976, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  Elizabeth K. Warrington,et al.  Amnesia: A disconnection syndrome? , 1982, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  G. Bower,et al.  From conditioning to category learning: an adaptive network model. , 1988 .

[4]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Hippocampal system dysfunction and odor discrimination learning in rats: impairment or facilitation depending on representational demands. , 1988, Behavioral neuroscience.

[5]  M. Packard,et al.  Differential effects of fornix and caudate nucleus lesions on two radial maze tasks: evidence for multiple memory systems , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  L. Squire,et al.  The Neuropsychology of Memory , 1990 .

[7]  J. Steinmetz,et al.  Acquisition of classically conditioned-related activity in the hippocampus is affected by lesions of the cerebellar interpositus nucleus. , 1990, Behavioral neuroscience.

[8]  L. Squire Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. , 1992, Psychological review.

[9]  M. Gluck,et al.  Hippocampal mediation of stimulus representation: A computational theory , 1993, Hippocampus.

[10]  M. Gluck,et al.  Probabilistic classification learning in amnesia. , 1994, Learning & memory.

[11]  J. Haxby,et al.  Network analysis of brain cognitive function using metabolic and blood flow data , 1995, Behavioural Brain Research.

[12]  L R Squire,et al.  Dissociable properties of memory systems: differences in the flexibility of declarative and nondeclarative knowledge. , 1996, Behavioral neuroscience.

[13]  Jane S. Paulsen,et al.  Dissociations within nondeclarative memory in Huntington's disease. , 1996 .

[14]  Jennifer A. Mangels,et al.  A Neostriatal Habit Learning System in Humans , 1996, Science.

[15]  J. D. McGaugh,et al.  Inactivation of Hippocampus or Caudate Nucleus with Lidocaine Differentially Affects Expression of Place and Response Learning , 1996, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[16]  M A Gluck,et al.  Late-training amnesic deficits in probabilistic category learning: a neurocomputational analysis. , 1996, Learning & memory.

[17]  J. Gabrieli Cognitive neuroscience of human memory. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Characterizing Stimulus–Response Functions Using Nonlinear Regressors in Parametric fMRI Experiments , 1998, NeuroImage.

[19]  P. Magistretti,et al.  Cellular mechanisms of brain energy metabolism and their relevance to functional brain imaging. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[20]  Carol A. Seger,et al.  Striatal activation during acquisition of a cognitive skill. , 1999, Neuropsychology.

[21]  M. Packard Glutamate infused posttraining into the hippocampus or caudate-putamen differentially strengthens place and response learning. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Stochastic Designs in Event-Related fMRI , 1999, NeuroImage.

[23]  A M Dale,et al.  Optimal experimental design for event‐related fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[24]  M. Hallett,et al.  The relative metabolic demand of inhibition and excitation , 2000, Nature.

[25]  Catherine E. Myers,et al.  Gateway to Memory: An Introduction to Neural Network Modeling of the Hippocampus and Learning , 2000 .

[26]  Barry Horwitz,et al.  Interpreting PET and fMRI measures of functional neural activity: the effects of synaptic inhibition on cortical activation in human imaging studies , 2001, Brain Research Bulletin.

[27]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  From Conditioning to Conscious Recollection , 2001 .

[28]  M. Baxter,et al.  Multiple brain-memory systems: the whole does not equal the sum of its parts , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.