Finite Element-based Preclinical Testing of Cemented Total Hip Implants

We developed a finite element model to preclinically test cemented hip implants for damage accumulation, including cement crack formation, creep, and stem migration. Using this model, we simulated the mechanical failure processes of four cemented total hip arthroplasty implants (Lubinus SPII, Mueller Curved, Exeter and Charnley, all with known clinical results) during cyclic normal walking and stair-climbing loads. These four implants were selected to ascertain whether the simulation predicted greater damage development around clinically inferior stems, whether clinically inferior designs could be identified by an initial stress analysis without the prediction of cement damage, and whether the simulation could predict high implant subsidence rates in combination with minimal cement damage. Based on the predicted cement crack patterns and crack formation rates, the simulation correctly identified the clinically inferior implant designs. Based only on the initial stress analysis under a stair-climbing load, it was not possible to identify clinically inferior designs. High subsidence values and minimal cement damage were predicted for the Exeter implant, similar to clinical findings. Our findings suggest the simulation may be effective in differentiating between a range of implants and design features.

[1]  J. Fisher,et al.  A retrieval study of capital hip prostheses with titanium alloy femoral stems. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Subsidence of THA stems due to acrylic cement creep is extremely sensitive to interface friction. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  M Honl,et al.  Duration and frequency of every day activities in total hip patients. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  W J Maloney,et al.  The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[5]  R. Ling,et al.  The Use of a Collar and Precoating on Cemented Femoral Stems Is Unnecessary and Detrimental , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  M Viceconti,et al.  TRI2SOLID: an application of reverse engineering methods to the creation of CAD models of bone segments. , 1998, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[7]  R. Coutts,et al.  Early failure of a roughened surface, precoated femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  J. Lemaître How to use damage mechanics , 1984 .

[9]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Prevention of mesh-dependent damage growth in finite element simulations of crack formation in acrylic bone cement. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Finite element simulation of anisotropic damage accumulation and creep in acrylic bone cement , 2004 .

[11]  A. J. Lee,et al.  The Time-dependent Properties of Polymethylmethacrylate Bone Cement: the Interaction of Shape of Femoral Stems, Surface Finish and Bone Cement , 2000 .

[12]  R. N. Stauffer Ten-year follow-up study of total hip replacement. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  D W Murray,et al.  Cement migration after THR. A comparison of charnley elite and exeter femoral stems using RSA. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  David W. Murray,et al.  Cement migration after THR , 1999 .

[15]  W. Maloney,et al.  Importance of a Thin Cement Mantle: Autopsy Studies of Eight Hips , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  P Herberts,et al.  Prognosis of total hip replacement. , 1996, International Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine.

[17]  J. Hunter,et al.  Early femoral loosening in one design of cemented hip replacement. , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[18]  Nico Verdonschot,et al.  Can Finite Element Models Detect Clinically Inferior Cemented Hip Implants? , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Failed innovation in total hip replacement. Diagnosis and proposals for a cure. , 1993, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[20]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Musculo-skeletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Finite-element analysis of failure of the Capital Hip designs. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[22]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[23]  P J Prendergast,et al.  The relationship between stress, porosity, and nonlinear damage accumulation in acrylic bone cement. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[24]  J. Chaboche Continuum Damage Mechanics: Part II—Damage Growth, Crack Initiation, and Crack Growth , 1988 .

[25]  J. Chaboche Continuum Damage Mechanics: Part I—General Concepts , 1988 .

[26]  A R Ingraffea,et al.  Mechanical characteristics of the stem‐cement interface , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[27]  de R René Borst,et al.  Some recent developments in computational modelling of concrete fracture , 1997 .

[28]  N Verdonschot,et al.  The effects of cement-stem debonding in THA on the long-term failure probability of cement. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  P Herberts,et al.  Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden. Follow-up of 92,675 operations performed 1978-1990. , 1993, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[30]  P. Schoenecker,et al.  Comprehensive treatment of late-onset tibia vara. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[31]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Dynamic creep behavior of acrylic bone cement. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[32]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  W H Harris,et al.  Is It Advantageous to Strengthen the Cement‐Metal Interface and Use a Collar for Cemented Femoral Components of Total Hip Replacements? , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[34]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Finite element and experimental models of cemented hip joint reconstructions can produce similar bone and cement strains in pre-clinical tests. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Migration, Stem Shape, and Surface Finish in Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[36]  H. Gill,et al.  Should total hip arthroplasty femoral components be designed to subside? A radiostereometric analysis study of the Charnley Elite and Exeter stems. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[37]  Amos Race,et al.  Cement-implant interface gaps explain the poor results of CMW3 for femoral stem fixation , 2005, Acta orthopaedica.

[38]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Measurement of non-linear microcrack accumulation rates in polymethylmethacrylate bone cement under cyclic loading , 1999, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[39]  Venkatesh Saligrama,et al.  Stem surface roughness alters creep induced subsidence and 'taper-lock' in a cemented femoral hip prosthesis. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[40]  P Herberts,et al.  Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: A review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases , 2000, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.