Amygdala lesions eliminate viewing preferences for faces in rhesus monkeys

Significance The primate brain is specialized for social interaction, and a complex network of brain regions supports this important function. Face perception is central to social development, and both humans and nonhuman primates exhibit a spontaneous viewing preference for faces. This shared involuntary response underscores the importance of faces in the earliest stages of cognitive development, yet its neural basis is not well understood. Here we report that bilateral amygdala lesions in rhesus monkeys eliminate the robust viewing preference for both real faces and illusory faces. This demonstrates a fundamental role for the amygdala in guiding eye movements toward face stimuli, a critical behavior for normal social development and social interaction. In free-viewing experiments, primates orient preferentially toward faces and face-like stimuli. To investigate the neural basis of this behavior, we measured the spontaneous viewing preferences of monkeys with selective bilateral amygdala lesions. The results revealed that when faces and nonface objects were presented simultaneously, monkeys with amygdala lesions had no viewing preference for either conspecific faces or illusory facial features in everyday objects. Instead of directing eye movements toward socially relevant features in natural images, we found that, after amygdala loss, monkeys are biased toward features with increased low-level salience. We conclude that the amygdala has a role in our earliest specialized response to faces, a behavior thought to be a precursor for efficient social communication and essential for the development of face-selective cortex.

[1]  Jessica Taubert,et al.  Characterizing the response to face pareidolia in human category-selective visual cortex , 2017, bioRxiv.

[2]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Face Pareidolia in the Rhesus Monkey , 2017, Current Biology.

[3]  Margaret S. Livingstone,et al.  Seeing faces is necessary for face-patch formation , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  A. Klin,et al.  Infant viewing of social scenes is under genetic control and atypical in autism , 2017, Nature.

[5]  E. Murray,et al.  MRI Overestimates Excitotoxic Amygdala Lesion Damage in Rhesus Monkeys , 2017, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[6]  Social cognition in autism: Face tuning , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[7]  Wilbert Zarco,et al.  A causal relationship between face-patch activity and face-detection behavior , 2017, eLife.

[8]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Development of the macaque face-patch system , 2017, Nature Communications.

[9]  Ueli Rutishauser,et al.  Fixations Gate Species-Specific Responses to Free Viewing of Faces in the Human and Macaque Amygdala. , 2017, Cell reports.

[10]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Anatomical Connections of the Functionally Defined “Face Patches” in the Macaque Monkey , 2016, Neuron.

[11]  B. Rogé,et al.  Intact perception but abnormal orientation towards face-like objects in young children with ASD , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[12]  Lloyd H. Michael,et al.  The Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. , 2016, ILAR journal.

[13]  Vincent D Costa,et al.  Amygdala lesions in rhesus macaques decrease attention to threat , 2015, Nature Communications.

[14]  Daniel P. Kennedy,et al.  Atypical Visual Saliency in Autism Spectrum Disorder Quantified through Model-Based Eye Tracking , 2015, Neuron.

[15]  R. Vogels,et al.  Neural Correlate of the Thatcher Face Illusion in a Monkey Face-Selective Patch , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  J. DiCarlo,et al.  Optogenetic and pharmacological suppression of spatial clusters of face neurons reveal their causal role in face gender discrimination , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Functional MRI mapping of dynamic visual features during natural viewing in the macaque , 2015, NeuroImage.

[18]  R. Vogels,et al.  The effect of face inversion for neurons inside and outside fMRI-defined face-selective cortical regions. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Katalin M. Gothard,et al.  Neurons in the Monkey Amygdala Detect Eye Contact during Naturalistic Social Interactions , 2014, Current Biology.

[20]  D. Maurer,et al.  Infant face preferences after binocular visual deprivation , 2013 .

[21]  Wen-Ming Luh,et al.  Amygdala lesions disrupt modulation of functional MRI activity evoked by facial expression in the monkey inferior temporal cortex , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Timothy K. Leonard,et al.  How macaques view familiarity and gaze in conspecific faces. , 2012, Behavioral neuroscience.

[23]  F. Simion,et al.  Face detection in complex visual displays: an eye-tracking study with 3- and 6-month-old infants and adults. , 2012, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[24]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Changes in cortical morphology resulting from long-term amygdala damage. , 2012, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[25]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  The Evolution of Social Orienting: Evidence from Chicks (Gallus gallus) and Human Newborns , 2011, PloS one.

[26]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  A face feature space in the macaque temporal lobe , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Katarzyna Chawarska,et al.  Looking But Not Seeing: Atypical Visual Scanning and Recognition of Faces in 2 and 4-Year-Old Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2009, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[28]  A. Klin,et al.  Two-year-olds with autism orient to nonsocial contingencies rather than biological motion , 2009, Nature.

[29]  Christof Koch,et al.  A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis , 2009 .

[30]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Mechanisms of face perception. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[31]  Y. Sugita Face perception in monkeys reared with no exposure to faces , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Mary A. Peterson,et al.  Multiple perceptual strategies used by macaque monkeys for face recognition , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[33]  Christoph D. Dahl,et al.  Individuation and holistic processing of faces in rhesus monkeys , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  K M Gothard,et al.  Neural responses to facial expression and face identity in the monkey amygdala. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Graph-Based Visual Saliency , 2006, NIPS.

[36]  R. Kiani,et al.  Microstimulation of inferotemporal cortex influences face categorization , 2006, Nature.

[37]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Newborns' preference for face-relevant stimuli: effects of contrast polarity. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  P. Schyns,et al.  A mechanism for impaired fear recognition after amygdala damage , 2005, Nature.

[39]  Katalin M. Gothard,et al.  How do rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) scan faces in a visual paired comparison task? , 2004, Animal Cognition.

[40]  N. Ambady,et al.  Effects of Gaze on Amygdala Sensitivity to Anger and Fear Faces , 2003, Science.

[41]  J. Grafman,et al.  The Human Amygdala: An Evolved System for Relevance Detection , 2003, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[42]  J. Piven,et al.  Visual Scanning of Faces in Autism , 2002, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[43]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Effects of selective neonatal temporal lobe lesions on socioemotional behavior in infant rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). , 2001, Behavioral neuroscience.

[44]  A. Young,et al.  Recognition of facial emotion in nine individuals with bilateral amygdala damage , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Functional imaging of the monkey brain , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Object Recognition and Location Memory in Monkeys with Excitotoxic Lesions of the Amygdala and Hippocampus , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  Division on Earth Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals , 1996 .

[48]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline , 1991, Cognition.

[49]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  CONSPEC and CONLERN: a two-process theory of infant face recognition. , 1991, Psychological review.

[50]  J M Findlay,et al.  Eye Movement Strategies Involved in Face Perception , 2013, Perception.

[51]  C. C. Goren,et al.  Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. , 1975, Pediatrics.