Long-Term Acceptance of Social Robots in Domestic Environments: Insights from a User's Perspective

The increasing mere presence of robots in everyday life does not automatically result in gradual acceptance of these systems by human users. Over the past years, we have conducted several studies with the goal to provide insight into the long-term process of social robots in domestic environments. This paper presents our overall conclusions from the combined findings of our multiple studies on social robot acceptance. We will provide insights from a user's perspective of what makes robots social, describe a phased framework of the long-term process of robot acceptance, present some key factors for social robot acceptance, offer guidelines to build better sociable robots, and provide some recommendations for conducting research in domestic environments. With sharing our experiences with conducting (long-term) user studies in domestic environments, we aim to serve to push this sub-field of HRI in real-world contexts forward and thereby the community at large

[1]  Anders Green,et al.  Social and collaborative aspects of interaction with a service robot , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[2]  Roger Silverstone,et al.  Design and the Domestication of ICTs : Technical Change and Everyday Life , 2007 .

[3]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Human-Agent and Human-Robot Interaction Theory: Similarities to and Differences from Human-Human Interaction , 2012, Human-Computer Interaction: The Agency Perspective.

[4]  Maartje M. A. de Graaf,et al.  Sharing a life with Harvey: Exploring the acceptance of and relationship-building with a social robot , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[5]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Social Robots for Long-Term Interaction: A Survey , 2013, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[6]  Mark A. Neerincx,et al.  Children's responses and opinion on three bots that motivate, educate and play , 2008 .

[7]  Sally Wyatt,et al.  They came, they surfed, they went back to the beach: Conceptualising use and non-use of the Internet , 2002 .

[8]  Alexander Wilson.  The information rich and the information poor , 1987 .

[9]  Tom Rodden,et al.  At home with the technology: an ethnographic study of a set-top-box trial , 1999, TCHI.

[10]  G. Gelderblom,et al.  Non-use of provided assistive technology devices, a literature overview , 2004 .

[11]  C. Bartneck,et al.  A design-centred framework for social human-robot interaction , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[12]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition , 2003 .

[13]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Trends in the Living Room and Beyond , 2007, EuroITV.

[14]  Hayeon Song,et al.  Effects of a Robot's Long-Term Cognitive Developments on Its Social Presence and People's Social Responses Toward It , 2005 .

[15]  Somaya Ben Allouch,et al.  Always connected: a longitudinal field study of mobile communication , 2004, Telematics Informatics.

[16]  Soumaya Ben Allouch,et al.  The design and anticipated adoption of ambient intelligence in the home , 2008 .

[17]  M. Skubic,et al.  Findings from a participatory evaluation of a smart home application for older adults. , 2008, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[18]  T. Kanda,et al.  A cross-cultural study on attitudes towards robots , 2005 .

[19]  de M.M.A. Graaf,et al.  Long-term evaluation of a social robot in real homes , 2014, HRI 2014.

[20]  Reid G. Simmons,et al.  Affective social robots , 2010, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[21]  A. Kerepesi,et al.  Behavioural comparison of human–animal (dog) and human–robot (AIBO) interactions , 2006, Behavioural Processes.

[22]  Kwan Min Lee,et al.  The effects of familiarity and robot gesture on user acceptance of information , 2013, 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[23]  Matei T. Ciocarlie,et al.  ROS commander (ROSCo): Behavior creation for home robots , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[24]  Sanna Leppënen,et al.  Daily Routines and Means of Communication in a Smart Home , 2003 .

[25]  B Phillips,et al.  Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. , 1993, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[26]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[27]  Brian R. Duffy,et al.  Anthropomorphism and the social robot , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[28]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships , 2005, TCHI.

[29]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Beyond the user: use and non-use in HCI , 2009, OZCHI.

[30]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Living with a Vacuum Cleaning Robot , 2013, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[31]  Maartje M. A. de Graaf,et al.  What Makes Robots Social?: A User's Perspective on Characteristics for Social Human-Robot Interaction , 2015, ICSR.

[32]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Designing sociable robots , 2002 .

[33]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Design spaces and niche spaces of believable social robots , 2002, Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[34]  John Zimmerman,et al.  User experience over time: an initial framework , 2009, CHI.

[35]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Robots in Society, Society in Robots , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[36]  Henrik I. Christensen,et al.  An Initial Framework to Unpack Long-Term Acceptance of Robots at Home , 2010 .

[37]  N. Selwyn.  The information aged: A qualitative study of older adults' use of information and communications technology , 2004 .

[38]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Human-Robot Interaction Experiments: Lessons learned , 2005 .

[39]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[40]  Henrik I. Christensen,et al.  Robots in the wild: Understanding long-term use , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[41]  Sara Ljungblad,et al.  How do you play with a robotic toy animal?: a long-term study of Pleo , 2010, IDC.

[42]  W. Banks,et al.  Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: use of robotic versus living dogs. , 2008, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[43]  Flis Henwood,et al.  The digital divide, health information and everyday life , 2005, New Media Soc..

[44]  Joan S. Howland,et al.  The ‘Digital Divide’: Are we becoming a world of technological ‘haves’ and ‘have‐nots?’ , 1998 .

[45]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Designing Embodied Cues for Dialog with Robots , 2011, AI Mag..