A geometric model of defensive peripersonal space

Potentially harmful stimuli occurring within the defensive peripersonal space (DPPS), a protective area surrounding the body, elicit stronger defensive reactions. The spatial features of the DPPS are poorly defined and limited to descriptive estimates of its extent along a single dimension. Here we postulated a family of geometric models of the DPPS, to address two important questions with respect to its spatial features: What is its fine-grained topography? How does the nervous system represent the body area to be defended? As a measure of the DPPS, we used the strength of the defensive blink reflex elicited by electrical stimulation of the hand (hand-blink reflex, HBR), which is reliably modulated by the position of the stimulated hand in egocentric coordinates. We tested the goodness of fit of the postulated models to HBR data from six experiments in which we systematically explored the HBR modulation by hand position in both head-centered and body-centered coordinates. The best-fitting model indicated that 1) the nervous system's representation of the body area defended by the HBR can be approximated by a half-ellipsoid centered on the face and 2) the DPPS extending from this area has the shape of a bubble elongated along the vertical axis. Finally, the empirical observation that the HBR is modulated by hand position in head-centered coordinates indicates that the DPPS is anchored to the face. The modeling approach described in this article can be generalized to describe the spatial modulation of any defensive response.

[1]  C. Spence,et al.  Multisensory interactions in the depth plane in front and rear space: A review , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  G. D. Iannetti,et al.  How many peripersonal spaces? , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  J. Hinojosa,et al.  A close look into the near/far space division: A real-distance ERP study , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  Gian Domenico Iannetti,et al.  Better Safe Than Sorry? The Safety Margin Surrounding the Body Is Increased by Anxiety , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  S. Williams,et al.  To Blink or Not to Blink: Fine Cognitive Tuning of the Defensive Peripersonal Space , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  G. Iannetti,et al.  Defensive peripersonal space: the blink reflex evoked by hand stimulation is increased when the hand is near the face. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  N. Fujii,et al.  Depth Perception and Defensive System Activation in a 3-D Environment , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[8]  Charles Spence,et al.  Audiotactile interactions in front and rear space , 2011, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[9]  E. Macaluso,et al.  The representation of space near the body through touch and vision , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Bettina Forster,et al.  An ERP Investigation on Visuotactile Interactions in Peripersonal and Extrapersonal Space: Evidence for the Spatial Rule , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  M. Bassolino,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Extended Multisensory Space in Blind Cane Users , 2022 .

[12]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Space perception and body morphology: extent of near space scales with arm length , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Dylan F. Cooke,et al.  Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  On the nature of near space: Effects of tool use and the transition to far space , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Dora E. Angelaki,et al.  Neurons compute internal models of the physical laws of motion , 2004, Nature.

[16]  Dylan F. Cooke,et al.  Defensive movements evoked by air puff in monkeys. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  E. Làdavas Functional and dynamic properties of visual peripersonal space , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Physical Imagery: Kinematic versus Dynamic Models , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  D M Merfeld,et al.  Humans use internal models to estimate gravity and linear acceleration , 1999, Nature.

[20]  Jeffrey C. Lagarias,et al.  Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[21]  Y. Shimo,et al.  Somatosensory-evoked blink response: investigation of the physiological mechanisms. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  E. Tolosa,et al.  Distinctive abnormalities of facial reflexes in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex (area F4). , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  E. Ldavas,et al.  Auditory Peripersonal Space in Humans , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  三輪英人 Somatosensory-evoked blink response: investigation of the physiological mechanism(体性感覚誘発瞬目反応: 生理機構の解明) , 1998 .