Artificial intelligence and brain theory: Unities and diversities

This review article synthesizes studies ofartificial intelligence (AI) andbrain theory (BT). In the control ofmovement, AI offers insight into overallplanning of behavior; while control theory enables BT to modelfeedback andfeedforward adjustments by the spinal cord, brainstem, and cerebellum. We stressaction-oriented perception—analyzing perception in terms of preparation for interaction with the world, and offer a new concept of aschema as the internal representation of an “object” in the sense of a domain of interaction. A schema comprises input-matching routines, action routines, and competition and cooperation routines. The internal representation of the world is then given by a “collage” of tuned and activated schemas.Segmentation of input andregion labeling are offered as two mechanisms in the activation of a suitable “collage.”We see a number of studies that offer hope of a unified theory ofcompetition and cooperation within a single subsystem: brain theory models of the reticular formation, of the frog midbrain visual system, and of segmentation on prewired features; and AI models of segmentation on ad hoc features, and of region labeling. We then turn to the modeling of a set of brain regions as acooperative computation system—a distributed structure in which each system has its own “goal structure” for selecting information to act on from its environment, and for transmitting the results to suitable receivers. We use this to describe a few findings ofneurology. We then sample AI studies of computerunderstanding of natural language, ascribing particular significance to a speech understanding system configured as a cooperative computation system.The literatures of AI and BT hardly overlap at all, and differ widely in choice of both problem and method. The aim of this article is to overcome these diversities by extracting contributions from extant AI and BT that can be melded into the creation of atop-down brain theory: the building of a coherent model of cooperative computation within which the computational roles of brain regions, and of neurons within those regions, can be analyzed.

[1]  D H HUBEL,et al.  RECEPTIVE FIELDS AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE IN TWO NONSTRIATE VISUAL AREAS (18 AND 19) OF THE CAT. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[3]  Carl Hewitt,et al.  PLANNER: A Language for Proving Theorems in Robots , 1969, IJCAI.

[4]  Victor R. Lesser,et al.  A Multi-Level Organization For Problem Solving Using Many, Diverse, Cooperating Sources Of Knowledge , 1975, IJCAI.

[5]  Richard Fikes,et al.  Learning and Executing Generalized Robot Plans , 1993, Artif. Intell..

[6]  Peter J. Burt,et al.  Computer Simulations of a Dynamic Visual Perception Model , 1975, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[7]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[8]  G. F. Franklin,et al.  Some Ideas on Information Processing in the Cerebellum , 1968 .

[9]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Binocular interaction on single units in cat striate cortex: Simultaneous stimulation by single moving slit with receptive fields in correspondence , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  K. Lashley The problem of serial order in behavior , 1951 .

[11]  W. Pitts,et al.  What the Frog's Eye Tells the Frog's Brain , 1959, Proceedings of the IRE.

[12]  J. Eccles The cerebellum as a computer: patterns in space and time. , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  G. Allen,et al.  Cerebrocerebellar communication systems. , 1974, Physiological reviews.

[14]  J. Parlange,et al.  Water uptake, diameter change, and nonlinear diffusion in tree stems. , 1975, Plant physiology.

[15]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  D. Ingle Visual Releasers of Prey-Catching Behavior in Frogs and Toads , 1968 .

[17]  S. Winograd,et al.  Reliable Computation in the Presence of Noise , 1963 .

[18]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  Parallelism, Slides, Schemas, and Frames , 1977 .

[19]  Allen Newell,et al.  Report on a general problem-solving program , 1959, IFIP Congress.

[20]  Parvati Dev,et al.  Perception of Depth Surfaces in Random-Dot Stereograms: A Neural Model , 1975, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[21]  Sensorimotor function of the midbrain tectum. I. Introduction. What is the optic tectum? , 1975, Neurosciences Research Program bulletin.

[22]  Nils J. Nilsson,et al.  A Formal Basis for the Heuristic Determination of Minimum Cost Paths , 1968, IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern..

[23]  G. Holmes THE CEREBELLUM OF MAN , 1939 .

[24]  Yorick Wilks,et al.  The goals of linguistic theory revisited. , 1973 .

[25]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding natural language , 1974 .

[26]  S. Grillner Locomotion in vertebrates: central mechanisms and reflex interaction. , 1975, Physiological reviews.

[27]  Fanya S. Montalvo,et al.  Consensus versus Competition in Neural Networks: A Comparative Analysis of Three Models , 1975, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[28]  William A. Woods,et al.  Computational Linguistics Transition Network Grammars for Natural Language Analysis , 2022 .

[29]  G. Orlovsky The effect of different descending systems on flexor and extensor activity during locomotion. , 1972, Brain research.

[30]  W. L. Kilmer,et al.  A model of the vertebrate central command system. , 1969 .

[31]  R. Stein Peripheral control of movement. , 1974, Physiological reviews.

[32]  J. Searle What is a Speech Act , 1996 .

[33]  Earl D. Sacerdott Planning in a hierarchy of abstraction spaces , 1973, IJCAI 1973.

[34]  Richard Fikes,et al.  STRIPS: A New Approach to the Application of Theorem Proving to Problem Solving , 1971, IJCAI.

[35]  Brian Cantwell Smith,et al.  Towards a programming apprentice , 1974, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[36]  O. G. Selfridge,et al.  Pandemonium: a paradigm for learning , 1988 .

[37]  William A. Woods,et al.  Progress in natural language understanding: an application to lunar geology , 1973, AFIPS National Computer Conference.

[38]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Inference and the Computer Understanding of Natural Language , 1973, Artif. Intell..

[39]  W. Pitts,et al.  How we know universals; the perception of auditory and visual forms. , 1947, The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics.

[40]  G. Miller,et al.  Plans and the structure of behavior , 1960 .

[41]  John McCarthy,et al.  Professor Sir James Lighthill, FRS. Artificial Intelligence: A General Survey , 1974, Artif. Intell..

[42]  W. McCulloch The heterarchy of values determined by the topology of nervous nets. , 1945, The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics.

[43]  E. Riseman,et al.  Region Growing in Textured Outdoor Scenes. , 1975 .

[44]  E. Goffman Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[45]  G. Miller,et al.  Plans and the structure of behavior , 1960 .

[46]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[47]  A. Luria The Working Brain , 1973 .

[48]  Charles F. Schmidt,et al.  Understanding Human Action , 1975, TINLAP.

[49]  J I Nelson,et al.  Globality and stereoscopic fusion in binocular vision. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[50]  RICHARD L. DIDDAY,et al.  Eye Movements and Visual Perception: A "Two Visual System" Model , 1975, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[51]  R. Llinás The cortex of the cerebellum. , 1975, Scientific American.

[52]  V. Braitenberg The cerebellar cortex as a timing organ: Discussion of an hypothesis , 1962 .

[53]  B. Julesz Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[54]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Computer Models of Thought and Language , 1974 .

[55]  D Ingle Sensorimotor function of the midbrain tectum. II. Classes of visually guided behavior. , 1975, Neurosciences Research Program bulletin.

[56]  J. Doran,et al.  Experiments with the Graph Traverser program , 1966, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[57]  R H Wurtz,et al.  The primate superior colliculus and the shift of visual attention. , 1972, Investigative ophthalmology.

[58]  M. Arbib,et al.  Conceptual models of neural organization. , 1974, Neurosciences Research Program bulletin.

[59]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[60]  Yorick Wilks,et al.  Natural Language Understanding Systems Within The AI Paradigm: A Survey And Some Comparisons , 1974, ACL Microfiche Series 1-83, Including Computational Linguistics.

[61]  W. Nauta THE PROBLEM OF THE FRONTAL LOBE: A REINTERPRETATION , 1972 .

[62]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Scene Labeling by Relaxation Operations , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[63]  M. E. Scheibel,et al.  The Brain Stem Reticular Core—An Integrative Matrix , 1968 .

[64]  Eugene Charniak,et al.  Organization and Inference in a Frame-Like System of Common Sense Knowledge , 1975, TINLAP.