A New Inlier Identification Scheme for Robust Estimation Problems

Common goal of many computer vision and robotics algorithms is to extract geometric information from the sensory data. Due to noisy measurements and errors in matching or segmentation, the available data are often corrupted with outliers. In such instances robust estimation methods are employed for the problem of parametric model estimation. In the presence of a large fraction of outliers sampling based methods are often the preferred choice. Traditionally used RANSAC algorithm however requires a large number of samples, prior knowledge of the outlier ratio and an additional, difficult to obtain, inlier threshold for hypothesis evaluation. To tackle these problems we propose a novel efficient sampling based method for the robust estimation of model parameters. The method is based on the observation that for each data point, the properties of the residual distribution with respect to the generated hypotheses reveal whether the point is an outlier or an inlier. The problem of inlier/outlier identification can then be formulated as a classification problem. The proposed method is demonstrated on motion estimation problems from image correspondences with a large percentage of outliers (70%) on both synthetic and real data and estimation of planar models from range data. The method is shown to be of an order of magnitude more efficient than currently existing methods and does not require a prior knowledge of the outlier ratio and the inlier threshold.

[1]  David Suter,et al.  Robust adaptive-scale parametric model estimation for computer vision , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  MLESAC: A New Robust Estimator with Application to Estimating Image Geometry , 2000, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[3]  David Suter,et al.  Robust Fitting by Adaptive-Scale Residual Consensus , 2004, ECCV.

[4]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[5]  Jiri Matas,et al.  Randomized RANSAC with Td, d test , 2004, Image Vis. Comput..

[6]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Wide baseline stereo matching , 1998, Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271).

[7]  Jana Kosecka,et al.  Ensemble Method for Robust Motion Estimation , 2006, 2006 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop (CVPRW'06).

[8]  John Mark Bishop,et al.  NAPSAC: high noise, high dimensional model parameterisation - it's in the bag , 2002 .

[9]  Bernhard P. Wrobel,et al.  Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision , 2001 .

[10]  David Nistér,et al.  Preemptive RANSAC for live structure and motion estimation , 2003, Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[11]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Robust Detection of Degenerate Configurations while Estimating the Fundamental Matrix , 1998, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[12]  David W. Murray,et al.  Guided Sampling and Consensus for Motion Estimation , 2002, ECCV.

[13]  G LoweDavid,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004 .

[14]  Jiri Matas,et al.  Randomized RANSAC with T(d, d) test , 2002, BMVC.

[15]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Viewpoint invariant texture matching and wide baseline stereo , 2001, Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001.

[16]  Edwin Olson,et al.  Single-Cluster Spectral Graph Partitioning for Robotics Applications , 2005, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[17]  P. Rousseeuw Least Median of Squares Regression , 1984 .