Effects on human motor strategies of physical interaction with a force-controlled wrist rehabilitation robot

In this work we analyze the effects of a force control scheme, implemented on a robot for wrist rehabilitation (InMotion3 by Interactive Motion Inc. [1]) to reduce the perceived mechanical impedance, on human motor strategies during pointing tasks. Previous studies showed that mechanical impedance of the robot interferes with natural motor strategies [2]. Three healthy subjects performed pointing tasks in three different operative ways: i) with a lightweight hand-held device (capable of measuring wrist rotations without introducing negligible loading effects); ii) with the InMotion3 controlled using the default control with the impedance parameters set to zero; iii) with the same robot, controlled using a direct force control scheme, which reduces the perceived mechanical impedance. In order to study the effects of the force control on the intrinsic kinematic constraints, we assessed wrist rotations with the same protocol we already used to study wrist motor strategies during redundant pointing tasks. The thickness of Donders surfaces (see [3] and [4] for details) indicates how much a soft constraint (such as Donders Law) applies to wrist kinematics during pointing tasks. The effects of force control can be primarily found in the variability of the fitted surfaces as well as in their thickness values. In particular, thickness values, which for the uncontrolled robot are one order of magnitude smaller than the physiological values (suggesting that the constraint has a mechanical origin rather than a neural one), return back into the physiological range in the case of the force-controlled robot.

[1]  Richard Volpe,et al.  A theoretical and experimental investigation of explicit force control strategies for manipulators , 1993, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[2]  T. Vilis,et al.  Geometric relations of eye position and velocity vectors during saccades , 1990, Vision Research.

[3]  T. Flash,et al.  Intrinsic joint kinematic planning. I: Reassessing the Listing’s law constraint in the control of three-dimensional arm movements , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  R. Riener,et al.  Human-centered robotics applied to gait training and assessment. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  Domenico Campolo,et al.  Kinematic analysis of the human wrist during pointing tasks , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  N. Hogan,et al.  Rehabilitators, Robots, and Guides: New Tools for Neurological Rehabilitation , 2000 .

[7]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation , 1994 .

[8]  Domenico Campolo,et al.  Intrinsic Constraints of Neural Origin: Assessment and Application to Rehabilitation Robotics , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[9]  Dale A. Lawrence,et al.  Impedance control stability properties in common implementations , 1988, Proceedings. 1988 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  H. F. Machiel van der Loos,et al.  Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[11]  Domenico Campolo,et al.  On the kinematics of human wrist during pointing tasks with application to motor rehabilitation , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  J. Schaechter Motor rehabilitation and brain plasticity after hemiparetic stroke , 2004, Progress in Neurobiology.

[13]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[14]  Agnes M F Wong,et al.  Listing's law: clinical significance and implications for neural control. , 2004, Survey of ophthalmology.

[15]  Nevio Luigi Tagliamonte,et al.  Coping with intrinsic constraints of neural origin in the design of rehabilitation robots: A preliminary study , 2009, 2009 4th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.

[16]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Inertial Properties in Robotic Manipulation: An Object-Level Framework , 1995, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[17]  Robert Teasell,et al.  Plasticity and Reorganization of the Brain Post Stroke , 2005, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[18]  Domenico Campolo,et al.  Force control of a robot for wrist rehabilitation: Towards coping with human intrinsic constraints , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[19]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[20]  H.I. Krebs,et al.  Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation: A Robot for Wrist Rehabilitation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[21]  W. Rymer,et al.  Robotic Devices for Movement Therapy After Stroke: Current Status and Challenges to Clinical Acceptance , 2002, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.