Nonlinear operator for oriented texture

Texture is an important part of the visual world of animals and humans and their visual systems successfully detect, discriminate, and segment texture. Relatively recently progress was made concerning structures in the brain that are presumably responsible for texture processing. Neurophysiologists reported on the discovery of a new type of orientation selective neuron in areas V1 and V2 of the visual cortex of monkeys which they called grating cells. Such cells respond vigorously to a grating of bars of appropriate orientation, position and periodicity. In contrast to other orientation selective cells, grating cells respond very weakly or not at all to single bars which do not make part of a grating. Elsewhere we proposed a nonlinear model of this type of cell and demonstrated the advantages of grating cells with respect to the separation of texture and form information. In this paper, we use grating cell operators to obtain features and compare these operators in texture analysis tasks with commonly used feature extracting operators such as Gabor-energy and co-occurrence matrix operators. For a quantitative comparison of the discrimination properties of the concerned operators a new method is proposed which is based on the Fisher (1923) linear discriminant and the Fisher criterion. The operators are also qualitatively compared with respect to their ability to separate texture from form information and their suitability for texture segmentation.

[1]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[2]  J. Bergen,et al.  Computational Modeling of Visual Texture Segregation , 1991 .

[3]  J. Daugman Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[4]  G. Sandini,et al.  Responses of visual cortical cells to periodic and non‐periodic stimuli. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  Rüdiger von der Heydt,et al.  Grating cells in monkey visual cortex: Coding texture , 1991 .

[6]  S. Lu,et al.  Texture segmentation by clustering of Gabor feature vectors , 1991, IJCNN-91-Seattle International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[7]  Zhiling Wang,et al.  Comparison of several approaches for the segmentation of texture images , 1996, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[8]  B. Ramamoorthy,et al.  Statistical methods to compare the texture features of machined surfaces , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[9]  D. Hubel Exploration of the primary visual cortex, 1955–78 , 1982, Nature.

[10]  J. MacQueen Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[11]  Robert J. Schalkoff,et al.  Pattern recognition - statistical, structural and neural approaches , 1991 .

[12]  K. Laws Textured Image Segmentation , 1980 .

[13]  Robert Goutte,et al.  A comparison of bilinear space/spatial-frequency representations for texture discrimination , 1995, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[14]  Hans Knutsson,et al.  Texture Analysis Using Two-Dimensional Quadrature Filters , 1983 .

[15]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Periodic-pattern-selective cells in monkey visual cortex , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Markov Random Field Texture Models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[17]  Nicolai Petkov,et al.  A Computational Model of Periodic-Pattern-Selective Cells , 1995, IWANN.

[18]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Unsupervised texture segmentation using Gabor filters , 1990, 1990 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Conference Proceedings.

[19]  Bedrich J. Hosticka,et al.  A comparison of texture feature extraction using adaptive gabor filtering, pyramidal and tree structured wavelet transforms , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[20]  Tieniu Tan,et al.  Texture edge detection by modelling visual cortical channels , 1995, Pattern Recognit..

[21]  Richard W. Conners,et al.  A Theoretical Comparison of Texture Algorithms , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[22]  H. L. Rietz The Mathematical Theory of Probabilities , 1916 .

[23]  Michael Spann,et al.  Texture feature performance for image segmentation , 1990, Pattern Recognit..

[24]  H. Spitzer,et al.  Complex-cell receptive field models , 1988, Progress in Neurobiology.

[25]  Richard C. Dubes,et al.  Performance evaluation for four classes of textural features , 1992, Pattern Recognit..

[26]  D. Pollen,et al.  Relationship between spatial frequency selectivity and receptive field profile of simple cells. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  Joseph Naor,et al.  Multiple Resolution Texture Analysis and Classification , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[28]  D. Burr,et al.  Feature detection in human vision: a phase-dependent energy model , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[29]  D. Hubel,et al.  Sequence regularity and geometry of orientation columns in the monkey striate cortex , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[30]  J. P. Jones,et al.  An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[32]  J. Movshon,et al.  Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  H. Spitzer,et al.  A complex-cell receptive-field model. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  J. Daugman Two-dimensional spectral analysis of cortical receptive field profiles , 1980, Vision Research.

[35]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition , 1972 .

[36]  Sarah H. Peckinpaugh An improved method for computing gray-level cooccurrence matrix based texture measures , 1991, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[37]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex , 1982, Vision Research.

[38]  S. Grossberg,et al.  15 – COMPUTATIONAL THEORIES OF VISUAL PERCEPTION , 1990 .

[39]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  A Comparative Study of Texture Measures for Terrain Classification , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[40]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Cluster analysis , 1974 .

[41]  J. Movshon,et al.  Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat's striate cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[42]  RussLL L. Ds Vnlos,et al.  SPATIAL FREQUENCY SELECTIVITY OF CELLS IN MACAQUE VISUAL CORTEX , 2022 .

[43]  E. Dodd,et al.  The Mathematical Theory of Probabilities. , 1923 .

[44]  M. Unser Local linear transforms for texture measurements , 1986 .

[45]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[46]  Nikolay Petkov,et al.  Biologically motivated computationally intensive approaches to image pattern recognition , 1995, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[47]  L. Palmer,et al.  The two-dimensional spatial structure of nonlinear subunits in the receptive fields of complex cells , 1990, Vision Research.

[48]  Nicolai Petkov,et al.  Computational models of visual neurons specialised in the detection of periodic and aperiodic oriented visual stimuli: bar and grating cells , 1997, Biological Cybernetics.

[49]  S Marcelja,et al.  Mathematical description of the responses of simple cortical cells. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.