Stimulus Motion Propels Traveling Waves in Binocular Rivalry

State transitions in the nervous system often take shape as traveling waves, whereby one neural state is replaced by another across space in a wave-like manner. In visual perception, transitions between the two mutually exclusive percepts that alternate when the two eyes view conflicting stimuli (binocular rivalry) may also take shape as traveling waves. The properties of these waves point to a neural substrate of binocular rivalry alternations that have the hallmark signs of lower cortical areas. In a series of experiments, we show a potent interaction between traveling waves in binocular rivalry and stimulus motion. The course of the traveling wave is biased in the motion direction of the suppressed stimulus that gains dominance by means of the wave-like transition. Thus, stimulus motion may propel the traveling wave across the stimulus to the extent that the stimulus motion dictates the traveling wave's direction completely. Using a computational model, we show that a speed-dependent asymmetry in lateral inhibitory connections between retinotopically organized and motion-sensitive neurons can explain our results. We argue that such a change in suppressive connections may play a vital role in the resolution of dynamic occlusion situations.

[1]  A. Sillito The spatial extent of excitatory and inhibitory zones in the receptive field of superficial layer hypercomplex cells , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  Nicholas J. Wade,et al.  Binocular rivalry with moving patterns , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  An occlusion-related mechanism of depth perception based on motion and interocular sequence , 1988, Nature.

[4]  George L. Gerstein,et al.  Feature-linked synchronization of thalamic relay cell firing induced by feedback from the visual cortex , 1994, Nature.

[5]  R. Andersen,et al.  Integration of motion and stereopsis in middle temporal cortical area of macaques , 1995, Nature.

[6]  M. Livingstone,et al.  Mechanisms of Direction Selectivity in Macaque V1 , 1998, Neuron.

[7]  J. Rinzel,et al.  Propagating activity patterns in large-scale inhibitory neuronal networks. , 1998, Science.

[8]  C. Gilbert Adult cortical dynamics. , 1998, Physiological reviews.

[9]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Form and motion have independent access to consciousness , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  H. Wilson,et al.  Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception , 2001, Nature.

[11]  Barton L. Anderson,et al.  Motion direction, speed and orientation in binocular matching , 2001, Nature.

[12]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Neural correlates of consciousness in humans , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  Colin Blakemore,et al.  Integration of motion information during binocular rivalry , 2002, Vision Research.

[14]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Visual competition , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  M. Giese,et al.  Nonlinear dynamics of direction-selective recurrent neural media. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  Gregory C DeAngelis,et al.  Coding of horizontal disparity and velocity by MT neurons in the alert macaque. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  David Alais,et al.  Increasing depth of binocular rivalry suppression along two visual pathways , 2003, Vision Research.

[18]  R. Blake,et al.  Visual motion, binocular correspondence and binocular rivalry , 1985, Biological Cybernetics.

[19]  Alexander Grunewald,et al.  The Integration of Multiple Stimulus Features by V1 Neurons , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Traveling waves of activity in primary visual cortex during binocular rivalry , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Lars Muckli,et al.  Primary Visual Cortex Activity along the Apparent-Motion Trace Reflects Illusory Perception , 2005, PLoS biology.

[22]  David Alais,et al.  Independent Binocular Rivalry Processes for Motion and Form , 2006, Neuron.

[23]  A. Sillito,et al.  Always returning: feedback and sensory processing in visual cortex and thalamus , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[24]  K. R. Brooks,et al.  Quantitative perceived depth from sequential monocular decamouflage , 2006, Vision Research.