Spontaneous mentalizing during an interactive real world task: An fMRI study

There are moments in everyday life when we need to consider the thoughts and intentions of other individuals in order to act in a socially appropriate manner. Most of this mentalizing occurs spontaneously as we go about our business in the complexity of the real world. As such, studying the neural basis of spontaneous mentalizing has been virtually impossible. Here we devised a means to achieve this by employing a unique combination of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), a detailed and interactive virtual reality simulation of a bustling familiar city, and a retrospective verbal report protocol. We were able to provide insights into the content of spontaneous mentalizing events and identify the brain regions that underlie them. We found increased activity in a number of regions, namely the right posterior superior temporal sulcus, the medial prefrontal cortex and the right temporal pole associated with spontaneous mentalizing. Furthermore, we observed the right posterior superior temporal sulcus to be consistently active during several different subtypes of mentalizing events. By contrast, medial prefrontal cortex seemed to be particularly involved in thinking about agents that were visible in the environment. Our findings show that it is possible to investigate the neural basis of mentalizing in a manner closer to its true context, the real world, opening up intriguing possibilities for making comparisons with those who have mentalizing problems.

[1]  Eleanor A. Maguire,et al.  Thoughts, behaviour, and brain dynamics during navigation in the real world , 2006, NeuroImage.

[2]  J. Morton,et al.  The cognitive basis of a biological disorder: autism , 1991, Trends in Neurosciences.

[3]  J. Decety,et al.  A PET Investigation of the Attribution of Intentions with a Nonverbal Task , 2000, NeuroImage.

[4]  Aina Puce,et al.  Configural Processing of Biological Motion in Human Superior Temporal Sulcus , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Involved in Perception of Biological Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  James K Rilling,et al.  The neural correlates of theory of mind within interpersonal interactions , 2004, NeuroImage.

[7]  C. Frith,et al.  Movement and Mind: A Functional Imaging Study of Perception and Interpretation of Complex Intentional Movement Patterns , 2000, NeuroImage.

[8]  T. Allison,et al.  Brain activation evoked by perception of gaze shifts: the influence of context , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Philip McGuire,et al.  Brain activity during stimulus independent thought. , 1996 .

[10]  Clinton D. Kilts,et al.  Dissociable Neural Pathways Are Involved in the Recognition of Emotion in Static and Dynamic Facial Expressions , 2003, NeuroImage.

[11]  C. Frith,et al.  Dissociable neural pathways for the perception and recognition of expressive and instrumental gestures , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  J. Decety,et al.  Brain Regions Involved in the Perception of Gaze: A PET Study , 1998, NeuroImage.

[13]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Verbal reports as data. , 1980 .

[14]  T. Allison,et al.  Temporal Cortex Activation in Humans Viewing Eye and Mouth Movements , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Other minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension , 1995, Cognition.

[16]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The Neural Basis of Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game , 2003, Science.

[17]  G. Pagnoni,et al.  A Neural Basis for Social Cooperation , 2002, Neuron.

[18]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Specific Involvement of Human Parietal Systems and the Amygdala in the Perception of Biological Motion , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  C. Frith,et al.  Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[20]  A. Wunderlich,et al.  Brain activation during human navigation: gender-different neural networks as substrate of performance , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  B. Bertenthal,et al.  Does Perception of Biological Motion Rely on Specific Brain Regions? , 2001, NeuroImage.

[22]  D. Stuss,et al.  The frontal lobes are necessary for 'theory of mind'. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[24]  Christopher D. Frith,et al.  Imaging the Intentional Stance in a Competitive Game , 2002, NeuroImage.

[25]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  D. Premack,et al.  Chimpanzee problem-solving: a test for comprehension. , 1978, Science.

[27]  C. Frith,et al.  Interacting minds--a biological basis. , 1999, Science.

[28]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Knowing where and getting there: a human navigation network. , 1998, Science.

[29]  C. Polkey,et al.  "Theory of mind" impairments and their relationship to executive functioning following frontal lobe excisions. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  J. Haxby,et al.  Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  R. Miall,et al.  A system in the human brain for predicting the actions of others , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  J. Decety,et al.  Top down effect of strategy on the perception of human biological motion: a pet investigation. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[33]  G. McCarthy,et al.  When Strangers Pass , 2004, Psychological science.

[34]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Activation in Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus Parallels Parameter Inducing the Percept of Animacy , 2005, Neuron.

[35]  N. Sadato,et al.  Attention to emotion modulates fMRI activity in human right superior temporal sulcus. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[36]  D. Perrett,et al.  A region of right posterior superior temporal sulcus responds to observed intentional actions , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  Aina Puce,et al.  Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[38]  J. Haxby,et al.  fMRI Responses to Video and Point-Light Displays of Moving Humans and Manipulable Objects , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  Uta Frith,et al.  Theory of mind , 2001, Current Biology.

[40]  R. Campbell,et al.  Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex , 2000, Current Biology.

[41]  C. Frith,et al.  Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’ , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  A. Young,et al.  Reading the mind from eye gaze , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  C. Frith,et al.  Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  R. E Passingham,et al.  Inferring false beliefs from the actions of oneself and others: an fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[45]  R Saxe,et al.  People thinking about thinking people The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind” , 2003, NeuroImage.

[46]  E. Maguire,et al.  The Well-Worn Route and the Path Less Traveled Distinct Neural Bases of Route Following and Wayfinding in Humans , 2003, Neuron.

[47]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  D. Pandya,et al.  Efferent cortical connections of multimodal cortex of the superior temporal sulcus in the rhesus monkey , 1992, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[49]  J. Decety,et al.  The effects of learning and intention on the neural network involved in the perception of meaningless actions. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[50]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The parahippocampus subserves topographical learning in man , 1996, NeuroImage.

[51]  E. Bullmore,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of implicit-motion perception or ‘representational momentum’ , 2000, Current Biology.

[52]  Daniel Houser,et al.  A functional imaging study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.