Inverse and direct dynamics of constrained multibody systems based on orthogonal decomposition of generalized force

This paper presents a unified approach for inverse and direct dynamics of constrained multibody systems that can be served as a basis for analysis, simulation, and control. The compactness of the dynamics formulation can result in computational efficiency. Furthermore, the acceleration is explicitly related to the generalized force by an introduced "constraint inertia matrix" which is proved to be always invertible. Thus a simulation may proceed even with the presence of redundant constraints or singular configurations. The generalized forces are decomposed onto two orthogonal subspaces which are considered as control inputs for controlling position and constraint force. The motion controller scheme, remarkably, requires no force feedback, proves to be stable, and minimizes actuation force. Finally, numerical and experimental results obtained from dynamic simulation and control of constrained mechanical systems, based on the proposed inverse and direct dynamics formulations, are documented.

[1]  M. A. Serna,et al.  A modified Lagrangian formulation for the dynamic analysis of constrained mechanical systems , 1988 .

[2]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manipulators: The operational space formulation , 1987, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[3]  S. Lin,et al.  Stabilization Method for Numerical Integration of Multibody Mechanical Systems , 1998 .

[4]  Parviz E. Nikravesh,et al.  Application of Euler Parameters to the Dynamic Analysis of Three-Dimensional Constrained Mechanical Systems , 1981 .

[5]  Yoshihiko Nakamura,et al.  Dynamics computation of closed-link robot mechanisms with nonredundant and redundant actuators , 1989, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[6]  W. Schiehlen,et al.  A projective criterion to the coordinate partitioning method for multibody dynamics , 1994, Archive of Applied Mechanics.

[7]  Javier García de Jalón,et al.  Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems , 1994 .

[8]  Christine Chevallereau,et al.  Calculation of the direct dynamic model of walking robots: comparison between two methods , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  R. Ledesma,et al.  Augmented lagrangian and mass-orthogonal projection methods for constrained multibody dynamics , 1996 .

[10]  E. Haug,et al.  Generalized Coordinate Partitioning for Dimension Reduction in Analysis of Constrained Dynamic Systems , 1982 .

[11]  A. Bicchi,et al.  Randomized parallel simulation of constrained multibody systems for VR/haptic applications , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[12]  Tsuneo Yoshikawa,et al.  Dynamic hybrid position/force control of robot manipulators--Description of hand constraints and calculation of joint driving force , 1986, IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  N. H. McClamroch,et al.  Feedback stabilization and tracking of constrained robots , 1988 .

[14]  George M. Lance,et al.  A Differentiable Null Space Method for Constrained Dynamic Analysis , 1987 .

[15]  S. Shankar Sastry,et al.  Kinematics and control of multifingered hands with rolling contact , 1989 .

[16]  Li-Chen Fu,et al.  An adaptive control scheme for coordinated multimanipulator systems , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..