Actuation Techniques for Sensing Uncertainty Reduction

The information acquisition performance of a sensor network is critical to all applications based on it. This performance depends on factors which cannot be completely known at design or deployment time: sensing medium characteristics and the phenomenon distribution. Simplifying assumptions such as the homogeneous nature of sensing media do not hold in most practical scenarios due to the presence of sensing obstacles. Further, the medium and phenomena may change over time. We propose to use controlled mobility to enhance coverage at run time in an autonomous manner. However, extensive robotic capabilities and supporting services such as precise navigation may be infeasible in large scale sensor networks. We present feasible alternatives for physical reconfiguration using low complexity and low energy actuation. The key contribution of the paper is to show that even small degrees of actuation can lead to a significant coverage advantage. We also compare this approach to conventional means for achieving equivalent coverage by increasing node density without actuation. Further, we discuss the relevant trade-offs which affect the use of mobility in terms of the time required for actuation.

[1]  Andy Hopper,et al.  Building World Models by Ray-Tracing within Ceiling-Mounted Positioning Systems , 2003, UbiComp.

[2]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Studying the feasibility of energy harvesting in a mobile sensor network , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[3]  Anantha Chandrakasan,et al.  A framework for energy-scalable communication in high-density wireless networks , 2002, ISLPED '02.

[4]  Matthew Lease,et al.  PlantCare: An Investigation in Practical Ubiquitous Systems , 2002, UbiComp.

[5]  Srdjan Capkun,et al.  Mobility helps security in ad hoc networks , 2003, MobiHoc '03.

[6]  Thomas F. La Porta,et al.  A bidding protocol for deploying mobile sensors , 2003, 11th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols, 2003. Proceedings..

[7]  William J. Kaiser,et al.  Autonomous Position Location in Distributed, Embedded, Wireless Systems , 2002 .

[8]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Constrained coverage for mobile sensor networks , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[9]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Impact of network density on data aggregation in wireless sensor networks , 2002, Proceedings 22nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems.

[10]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Robomote: a tiny mobile robot platform for large-scale ad-hoc sensor networks , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[11]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Intelligent fluid infrastructure for embedded networks , 2004, MobiSys '04.

[12]  Zack J. Butler,et al.  Event-Based Motion Control for Mobile-Sensor Networks , 2003, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[13]  W.J. Kaiser,et al.  Sensing uncertainty reduction using low complexity actuation , 2003, Third International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2004. IPSN 2004.

[14]  Jie Lin,et al.  Towards mobility as a network control primitive , 2004, MobiHoc '04.

[15]  James Scott,et al.  User-Friendly Surveying Techniques for Location-Aware Systems , 2003, UbiComp.

[16]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Networked Infomechanical Systems (NIMS) for Ambient Intelligence , 2005, Ambient Intelligence.

[17]  David Tse,et al.  Mobility increases the capacity of ad hoc wireless networks , 2002, TNET.