A Soft Bionic Gripper with Variable Effective Length

This article presented a four-fingered soft bionic robotic gripper with variable effective actuator lengths. By combining approaches of finite element analysis, quasi-static analytical modeling, and experimental measurements, the deformation of the single soft actuator as a function of air pressure input in free space was analyzed. To investigate the effect of the effective actuator length on the gripping performance of the gripper, we conducted systematical experiments to evaluate the pull-off force, the actuation speed, the precision and error tolerance of the soft gripper while grasping objects of various sizes and shapes. A combination of depressurization and pressurization in actuation as well as applying variable effective actuator length enhanced the gripper’s performance significantly, with no sensors. For example, with tunable effective actuator length, the gripper was able to grasp objects ranging from 2 mm – 170 mm robustly. Under the optimal length, the gripper could generate the maximum pull-off force for the corresponding object size; the precision and the error tolerance of the gripper were also significantly improved compared to those of the gripper with full-length. Our soft robotic prototype exhibits a simple control and low-cost approach of gripping a wide range of objects and may have wide leverage for future industrial operations.

[1]  Sung-Hoon Ahn,et al.  Review of manufacturing processes for soft biomimetic robots , 2009 .

[2]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  A 3D-printed, functionally graded soft robot powered by combustion , 2015, Science.

[3]  Mehmet Remzi Dogar,et al.  Haptic identification of objects using a modular soft robotic gripper , 2015, 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[4]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Modeling of Soft Fiber-Reinforced Bending Actuators , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[5]  Cecilia Laschi,et al.  Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[6]  Filip Ilievski,et al.  Soft robotics for chemists. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[7]  Stephen A. Morin,et al.  Camouflage and Display for Soft Machines , 2012, Science.

[8]  CianchettiMatteo,et al.  A Bioinspired Soft Robotic Gripper for Adaptable and Effective Grasping , 2015 .

[9]  Roger D. Quinn,et al.  How Does Soft Robotics Drive Research in Animal Locomotion , 2014 .

[10]  Fionnuala Connolly,et al.  Automatic design of fiber-reinforced soft actuators for trajectory matching , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots , 2016, Nature.

[12]  Heinrich M. Jaeger,et al.  Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  George M. Whitesides,et al.  A Hybrid Combining Hard and Soft Robots , 2014 .

[14]  YapHong Kai,et al.  High-Force Soft Printable Pneumatics for Soft Robotic Applications , 2016 .

[15]  Heinrich M. Jaeger,et al.  A Positive Pressure Universal Gripper Based on the Jamming of Granular Material , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[16]  Li Wen,et al.  Modeling and experiments of a soft robotic gripper in amphibious environments , 2017 .

[17]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Soft Machines That are Resistant to Puncture and That Self Seal , 2013, Advanced materials.

[18]  L. Wen,et al.  Hydrodynamic performance of a biomimetic robotic swimmer actuated by ionic polymer–metal composite , 2013 .

[19]  Conor J. Walsh,et al.  Multi-joint actuation platform for lower extremity soft exosuits , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[20]  Radhika Nagpal,et al.  Design and control of a bio-inspired soft wearable robotic device for ankle–foot rehabilitation , 2014, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[21]  Filip Ilievski,et al.  Multigait soft robot , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  A compliant, underactuated hand for robust manipulation , 2013, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[23]  Daniela Rus,et al.  Autonomous undulatory serpentine locomotion utilizing body dynamics of a fluidic soft robot , 2013, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[24]  Iain A. Anderson,et al.  Soft Two-Degree-of-Freedom Dielectric Elastomer Position Sensor Exhibiting Linear Behavior , 2015, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[25]  Shuichi Wakimoto,et al.  Miniature Pneumatic Curling Rubber Actuator Generating Bidirectional Motion with One Air-Supply Tube , 2011, Adv. Robotics.

[26]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  A compliant underactuated hand with suction flow for underwater mobile manipulation , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[27]  Andrew McDaid,et al.  Design, modelling and simulation of soft grippers using new bimorph pneumatic bending actuators , 2017 .

[28]  Stephen A. Morin,et al.  Using explosions to power a soft robot. , 2013, Angewandte Chemie.

[29]  Oliver Brock,et al.  A Novel Type of Compliant, Underactuated Robotic Hand for Dexterous Grasping , 2014, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[30]  P. Polygerinos,et al.  Mechanical Programming of Soft Actuators by Varying Fiber Angle , 2015 .

[31]  B Mazzolai,et al.  An octopus-bioinspired solution to movement and manipulation for soft robots , 2011, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[32]  Kevin C. Galloway,et al.  Interaction Forces of Soft Fiber Reinforced Bending Actuators , 2017, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[33]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Pneumatic Networks for Soft Robotics that Actuate Rapidly , 2014 .

[34]  H. Lipson Challenges and Opportunities for Design, Simulation, and Fabrication of Soft Robots , 2014 .

[35]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  THEORY OF PLATES AND SHELLS , 1959 .

[36]  Oliver Brock,et al.  A novel type of compliant and underactuated robotic hand for dexterous grasping , 2016, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[37]  D. Rus,et al.  Design, fabrication and control of soft robots , 2015, Nature.