Disclosing pathogenic genetic variants to research participants: quantifying an emerging ethical responsibility.

There is an emerging consensus that when investigators obtain genomic data from research participants, they may incur an ethical responsibility to inform at-risk individuals about clinically significant variants discovered during the course of their research. With whole-exome sequencing becoming commonplace and the falling costs of full-genome sequencing, there will be an increasingly large number of variants identified in research participants that may be of sufficient clinical relevance to share. An explicit approach to triaging and communicating these results has yet to be developed, and even the magnitude of the task is uncertain. To develop an estimate of the number of variants that might qualify for disclosure, we apply recently published recommendations for the return of results to a defined and representative set of variants and then extrapolate these estimates to genome scale. We find that the total number of variants meeting the threshold for recommended disclosure ranges from 3955-12,579 (3.79%-12.06%, 95% CI) in the most conservative estimate to 6998-17,189 (6.69%-16.48%, 95% CI) in an estimate including variants with variable disease expressivity. Additionally, if the growth rate from the previous 4 yr continues, we estimate that the total number of disease-associated variants will grow 37% over the next 4 yr.

[1]  C. Fernandez,et al.  Offering results to research participants , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  D. Roden,et al.  Development of a Large‐Scale De‐Identified DNA Biobank to Enable Personalized Medicine , 2008, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[3]  Amy L McGuire 1000 Genomes on the Road to Personalized Medicine. , 2008, Personalized medicine.

[4]  John G. Gray,et al.  Medicine , 1902, Glasgow Medical Journal.

[5]  Frances P Lawrenz,et al.  Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations , 2008, The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[6]  George Church,et al.  Ethical and Practical Guidelines for Reporting Genetic Research Results to Study Participants: Updated Guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular genetics.

[7]  Laura M. Beskow,et al.  Offering Individual Genetic Research Results: Context Matters , 2010, Science Translational Medicine.

[8]  M Gwinn,et al.  Informed consent for population-based research involving genetics. , 2001, JAMA.

[9]  R. Fitzpatrick eMedicine , 2002, Medical reference services quarterly.

[10]  Isaac S. Kohane,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Databases and Ontologies Automated Validation of Genetic Variants from Large Databases: Ensuring That Variant References Refer to the Same Genomic Locations , 2022 .

[11]  J. Stockman Disclosure of APOE Genotype for Risk of Alzheimer's Disease , 2011 .

[12]  Kenneth D. Mandl,et al.  Reestablishing the Researcher-Patient Compact , 2007, Science.

[13]  Nathan Blow,et al.  Biobanking: freezer burn , 2009, Nature Methods.

[14]  Charles Weijer,et al.  Informing study participants of research results: an ethical imperative. , 2003, IRB.

[15]  Robert B. Hartlage,et al.  This PDF file includes: Materials and Methods , 2009 .

[16]  Alexander A. Morgan,et al.  Clinical assessment incorporating a personal genome , 2010, The Lancet.

[17]  Susan M. Wolf,et al.  The Law of Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Establishing Researchers' Duties , 2008, The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[18]  C. Weijer,et al.  Obligations in Offering to Disclose Genetic Research Results , 2006, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[19]  Eric M Meslin,et al.  Research Ethics Recommendations for Whole-Genome Research: Consensus Statement , 2008, PLoS biology.

[20]  L. Henry Undesirable Implications of Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants , 2006 .

[21]  Euan A Ashley,et al.  Challenges in the clinical application of whole-genome sequencing , 2010, The Lancet.

[22]  Andrew D. Johnson,et al.  CLIA-tested genetic variants on commercial SNP arrays: Potential for incidental findings in genome-wide association studies , 2010, Genetics in Medicine.

[23]  J. Illes,et al.  An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure: a cost-effectiveness analysis of incidentally detected aneurysms in functional MRI research. , 2010, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[24]  K. Collins,et al.  Offering Results to Research Subjects: U.S. Institutional Review Board Policy , 2007, Accountability in research.

[25]  N A Holtzman,et al.  Predictive genetic testing: from basic research to clinical practice. , 1997, Science.

[26]  R. Altman,et al.  The incidentalome: a threat to genomic medicine. , 2006, JAMA.

[27]  Gail Geller,et al.  Public Expectations for Return of Results from Large-Cohort Genetic Research , 2008, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[28]  S. Teutsch,et al.  The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) initiative: methods of the EGAPP Working Group , 2009, Genetics in Medicine.

[29]  Patrick L. Taylor,et al.  Multidimensional Results Reporting to Participants in Genomic Studies: Getting It Right , 2010, Science Translational Medicine.

[30]  M. Guyer,et al.  Charting a course for genomic medicine from base pairs to bedside , 2011, Nature.

[31]  L. Brown,et al.  Interval Estimation for a Binomial Proportion , 2001 .

[32]  Alan F. Scott,et al.  McKusick's Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM®) , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[33]  Matthew Mort,et al.  The Human Gene Mutation Database: providing a comprehensive central mutation database for molecular diagnostics and personalised genomics , 2009, Human Genomics.

[34]  Isaac S Kohane,et al.  Medicine. Reestablishing the researcher-patient compact. , 2007, Science.

[35]  黄亚明 eMedicine , 2009 .

[36]  Gary H. Glover,et al.  Reducing Barriers to Ethics in Neuroscience , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[37]  G. Geller,et al.  Public perspectives on informed consent for biobanking. , 2009, American journal of public health.

[38]  M. White,et al.  Informed Consent for Research on Stored Blood and Tissue Samples: A Survey of Institutional Review Board Practices , 2002, Accountability in research.

[39]  Roberta A Pagon,et al.  GeneTests: an online genetic information resource for health care providers. , 2006, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[40]  J. Doyon,et al.  Informed consent for MRI and fMRI research: Analysis of a sample of Canadian consent documents , 2011, BMC medical ethics.

[41]  T. Raffin,et al.  Ethical consideration of incidental findings on adult brain MRI in research , 2004, Neurology.

[42]  Gail P Jarvik,et al.  Reporting genetic results in research studies: Summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group , 2006, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[43]  Rebekah Rasooly,et al.  The Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention Network , 2009, Genetics in Medicine.