The velocity tuning of single units in cat striate cortex.

1. The activity of single units was recorded from the striate cortex (area 17) of anaesthetized, paralysed cats. Responses to stimuli moving at different velocities were examined. 2. Peak evoked firing frequency, rather than fotal evoked spikes, is used throughout as a measure of response. The former mea‐ure gives curves of response vs. velocity that correlate well with curves of contrast sensitivity vs. velocity, wheras the latter does not. 3. Cortical receptive fields were classified according to the criteria of Hubel & Wiesel. Simple cells were found to prefer lower velocities (mean 2‐2 deg sec‐1) than complex cells (mean 18–8 deg sec‐1). The response of simple cells to stimuli moving faster than 20 deg sec‐1 is generally poor; complex cells usually discharge briskly to these speeds. 4. Cells classified as hypercomplex by the end‐inhibition criterion were further chara‐terized as type I or type II, according to the suggestion of Dreher (1972). Type I units are indistinguishable from simple cells in their velocity tuning, and type II units equally clearly resemble complex cells. These results are therefor consistent with Dreher's sbudivision. 5. Teh selectivity of cells for velocity is variable but can be quite marked. The average selectivities of simple and complex cells are not significantly different. There is an inverse correlation between preferred velocity and the sharpness of velocity selectivity for simple cells; no trend is apparent for other cell types. 6. No clear correlation is observed between the velocity preferances of units and their degree of direction selectivity, or receptive field arrangement. Simple cells with ‘sustainef’ temporal responses to flashed stimuli tend to prefer slower rates of movement than ‘transient’ ones, and to be less selective for velocity. 7. The results for different cortical cell‐types are compared with the velocity tuning of X‐ and Y‐cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus.

[1]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  H. Barlow,et al.  Retinal ganglion cells responding selectively to direction and speed of image motion in the rabbit , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  O. Grusser,et al.  Frog Retina: Detection of Movement , 1965, Science.

[4]  D. G. Green,et al.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  H. Barlow,et al.  The mechanism of directionally selective units in rabbit's retina. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  D H HUBEL,et al.  RECEPTIVE FIELDS AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE IN TWO NONSTRIATE VISUAL AREAS (18 AND 19) OF THE CAT. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  G. F. Cooper,et al.  The angular selectivity of visual cortical cells to moving gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  C. W. Oyster,et al.  The analysis of image motion by the rabbit retina , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  G. F. Cooper,et al.  The spatial selectivity of the visual cells of the cat , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  J. Stone,et al.  Conduction velocity of afferents to cat visual cortex: a correlation with cortical receptive field properties. , 1971, Brain research.

[13]  W. Levick,et al.  Sustained and transient neurones in the cat's retina and lateral geniculate nucleus , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  T. Powell,et al.  An experimental study of the termination of the lateral geniculo–cortical pathway in the cat and monkey , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[15]  B. Dreher Hypercomplex cells in the cat's striate cortex. , 1972, Investigative ophthalmology.

[16]  J. Stone,et al.  Relay of receptive-field properties in dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  J. Stone Morphology and physiology of the geniculocortical synapse in the cat: the question of parallel input to the striate cortex. , 1972, Investigative ophthalmology.

[18]  J. Stone,et al.  Projection of X- and Y-cells of the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus to areas 17 and 18 of visual cortex. , 1973, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  L. Maffei,et al.  The visual cortex as a spatial frequency analyser. , 1973, Vision research.

[20]  O. Grüsser,et al.  Neuronal Mechanisms of Visual Movement Perception and Some Psychophysical and Behavioral Correlations , 1973 .

[21]  W Singer,et al.  Inhibitory interaction between X and Y units in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus. , 1973, Brain research.

[22]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  The analysis of the drift rate of moving sinusoidal gratings. , 1973, Vision research.

[23]  B. Dreher,et al.  Receptive field analysis: responses to moving visual contours by single lateral geniculate neurones in the cat , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  D. Rose Proceedings: The hypercomplex cell classification in the cat's striate cortex. , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  G M Innocenti,et al.  Post-synaptic inhibitory components of the responses to moving stimuli in area 17. , 1974, Brain research.

[26]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Cell structure and function in the visual cortex of the cat , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  L. Palmer,et al.  Visual receptive fields of single striate corical units projecting to the superior colliculus in the cat. , 1974, Brain research.

[28]  M. Wright,et al.  Evidence for "sustained" and "transient" neurones in the cat's visual cortex. , 1974, Vision research.