Efficiency and Stability in Large Matching Markets

We study efficient and stable mechanisms in matching markets when the number of agents is large and individuals’ preferences and priorities are drawn randomly. When agents’ preferences are uncorrelated, then both efficiency and stability can be achieved in an asymptotic sense via standard mechanisms such as deferred acceptance and top trading cycles. When agents’ preferences are correlated over objects, however, these mechanisms are either inefficient or unstable even in an asymptotic sense. We propose a variant of deferred acceptance that is asymptotically efficient, asymptotically stable and asymptotically incentive compatible. This new mechanism performs well in a counterfactual calibration based on New York City school choice data.

[1]  Jerzy Jaworski A Random Bipartite Mapping , 1985 .

[2]  SangMok Lee,et al.  Incentive Compatibility of Large Centralized Matching Markets , 2017 .

[3]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  Stable husbands , 1990, SODA '90.

[4]  Eric Budish,et al.  Strategy-Proofness in the Large , 2017, The Review of Economic Studies.

[5]  Jacob D. Leshno,et al.  Unbalanced Random Matching Markets: The Stark Effect of Competition , 2017, Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  Donald E. Knuth,et al.  Stable Marriage and Its Relation to Other Combinatorial Problems: An Introduction to the Mathematical Analysis of Algorithms , 1996 .

[7]  L. B. Wilson,et al.  The stable marriage problem , 1971, Commun. ACM.

[8]  L. B. Wilson An analysis of the stable marriage assignment algorithm , 1972 .

[9]  B. Pittel On Likely Solutions of a Stable Marriage Problem , 1992 .

[10]  Parag A. Pathak,et al.  Appendix to "Incentives and Stability in Large Two-Sided Matching Markets" , 2009 .

[11]  Itai Ashlagi,et al.  Assigning More Students to their Top Choices: A Tiebreaking Rule Comparison , 2015, EC.

[12]  Sean P. Corcoran,et al.  School choice and competition in the New York City schools , 2011 .

[13]  Eric Budish,et al.  The Combinatorial Assignment Problem: Approximate Competitive Equilibrium from Equal Incomes , 2010, Journal of Political Economy.

[14]  William H. Lane,et al.  Stable Marriage Problem , 2001 .

[15]  Boris G. Pittel,et al.  The Average Number of Stable Matchings , 1989, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[16]  Fuhito Kojima,et al.  Incentives in the probabilistic serial mechanism , 2010, J. Econ. Theory.

[17]  H. Ergin Efficient Resource Allocation on the Basis of Priorities , 2002 .

[18]  Alvin E. Roth,et al.  The Economics of Matching: Stability and Incentives , 1982, Math. Oper. Res..

[19]  Jacob D. Leshno,et al.  Unbalanced random matching markets , 2013, EC '13.

[20]  Nicole Immorlica,et al.  Marriage, honesty, and stability , 2005, SODA '05.

[21]  Yan Chen,et al.  From Boston to Chinese parallel to deferred acceptance: theory and experiments on a family of school choice mechanisms , 2013 .

[22]  Leeat Yariv,et al.  On the Efficiency of Stable Matchings in Large Markets , 2014 .

[23]  Itai Ashlagi,et al.  Stability in Large Matching Markets with Complementarities , 2014, Oper. Res..

[24]  Milind Dawande,et al.  On Bipartite and Multipartite Clique Problems , 2001, J. Algorithms.

[25]  Parag A. Pathak,et al.  The Welfare Effects of Coordinated Assignment: Evidence from the New York City High School Match , 2017 .

[26]  Chunlin Liu,et al.  Enumeration for spanning forests of complete bipartite graphs , 2004, Ars Comb..

[27]  L. Shapley,et al.  On cores and indivisibility , 1974 .

[28]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  Random graphs , 2006, SODA '06.

[29]  Yeon-Koo Che,et al.  Asymptotic Equivalence of Probabilistic Serial and Random Priority Mechanisms , 2008 .

[30]  Parag A. Pathak,et al.  School Admissions Reform in Chicago and England: Comparing Mechanisms by Their Vulnerability to Manipulation. NBER Working Paper No. 16783. , 2011 .

[31]  Parag A. Pathak,et al.  The Boston Public School Match , 2005 .

[32]  Caterina Calsamiglia,et al.  Constrained School Choice: An Experimental Study , 2009 .

[33]  Onur Kesten,et al.  On two competing mechanisms for priority-based allocation problems , 2006, J. Econ. Theory.

[34]  Parag A. Pathak,et al.  School Admissions Reform in Chicago and England: Comparing Mechanisms by Their Vulnerability to Manipulation , 2011 .

[35]  L. Lovász Combinatorial problems and exercises , 1979 .

[36]  R. Zeckhauser,et al.  The Efficient Allocation of Individuals to Positions , 1979, Journal of Political Economy.

[37]  Eduardo M. Azevedo,et al.  Complementarity and Multidimensional Heterogeneity in Large Matching Markets , 2013 .

[38]  Yeon-Koo Che,et al.  Expanding 'Choice' in School Choice , 2008 .

[39]  M. Balinski,et al.  A Tale of Two Mechanisms: Student Placement , 1999 .

[40]  P. Pathak,et al.  The Welfare Effects of Coordinated Assignment: Evidence from the NYC HS Match , 2015 .

[41]  Tayfun Sönmez,et al.  Market Design for Kidney Exchange , 2011 .

[42]  Yinghua He,et al.  Beyond Truth-Telling: Preference Estimation with Centralized School Choice and College Admissions , 2019, American Economic Review.

[43]  Itai Ashlagi,et al.  What Matters in School Choice Tie-breakings?: How Competition Guides Design , 2016, EC.

[44]  Atila Abdulkadiroglu,et al.  School Choice: A Mechanism Design Approach , 2003 .

[45]  Eduardo M. Azevedo Complementarity and Multidimensional Heterogeneity in Matching Markets , 2012 .

[46]  Jay Sethuraman,et al.  Lotteries in Student Assignment: An Equivalence Result , 2010 .

[47]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  The Value of Purchase History Data in Target Marketing , 1996 .

[48]  Flip Klijn,et al.  Constrained school choice , 2009, J. Econ. Theory.

[49]  Xiaohan Zhong,et al.  Matching mechanisms and matching quality: Evidence from a top university in China , 2014, Games Econ. Behav..

[50]  Parag A. Pathak,et al.  The New York City High School Match , 2005 .

[51]  Eduardo M. Azevedo,et al.  A Supply and Demand Framework for Two-Sided Matching Markets , 2014, Journal of Political Economy.

[52]  Boris Pittel,et al.  Probabilistic Analysis of an Algorithm in the Theory of Markets in Indivisible Goods , 1995 .

[53]  Alvin E. Roth,et al.  Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis , 1990 .

[54]  Atila Abdulkadiroglu,et al.  RANDOM SERIAL DICTATORSHIP AND THE CORE FROM RANDOM ENDOWMENTS IN HOUSE ALLOCATION PROBLEMS , 1998 .

[55]  David A. Freedman,et al.  Machiavelli and the Gale-Shapley Algorithm , 1981 .

[56]  Robert W. Irving Stable Marriage , 2016, Encyclopedia of Algorithms.

[57]  Alvin E. Roth,et al.  Minimizing Justified Envy in School Choice: The Design of New Orleans&Apos; Oneapp , 2017 .

[58]  Yeon-Koo Che,et al.  An Analysis of Top Trading Cycles in Two-Sided Matching Markets , 2015 .

[59]  L. S. Shapley,et al.  College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage , 2013, Am. Math. Mon..

[60]  Onur Kesten,et al.  Chinese College Admissions and School Choice Reforms: A Theoretical Analysis , 2017, Journal of Political Economy.

[61]  Parag A. Pathak,et al.  What Really Matters in Designing School Choice Mechanisms , 2017 .

[62]  Stephen D Carter,et al.  Supply and demand. , 2017, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[63]  Parag A. Pathak,et al.  Strategy-Proofness versus Efficiency in Matching with Indifferences: Redesigning the NYC High School Match , 2009 .