Assessing the Quality of Student-Generated Content at Scale: A Comparative Analysis of Peer-Review Models
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Gašević,et al. Incorporating Training, Self-monitoring and AI-Assistance to Improve Peer Feedback Quality , 2022, L@S.
[2] D. Gašević,et al. Incorporating AI and learning analytics to build trustworthy peer assessment systems , 2022, Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[3] Roberto Martínez Maldonado,et al. Explainable Artificial Intelligence in education , 2022, Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell..
[4] S. Sadiq,et al. Neurophysiological Measurements in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review , 2021, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
[5] Hassan Khosravi,et al. Supporting peer evaluation of student-generated content: a study of three approaches , 2021, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.
[6] S. Sadiq,et al. Employing Peer Review to Evaluate the Quality of Student Generated Content at Scale: A Trust Propagation Approach , 2021, L@S.
[7] Shazia Wasim Sadiq,et al. Charting the Design and Analytics Agenda of Learnersourcing Systems , 2021, LAK.
[8] Barbara E. Hanna,et al. The effects of rubrics on evaluative judgement: a randomised controlled experiment , 2021, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.
[9] Gianluca Demartini,et al. Evaluating the Quality of Learning Resources: A Learnersourcing Approach , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.
[10] Shazia Wasim Sadiq,et al. Open Learner Models for Multi-activity Educational Systems , 2021, AIED.
[11] Shazia Wasim Sadiq,et al. Utilising Learnersourcing to Inform Design Loop Adaptivity , 2020, EC-TEL.
[12] Amal Zouaq,et al. Learnersourcing Quality Assessment of Explanations for Peer Instruction , 2020, EC-TEL.
[13] Philip J. Guo,et al. Learnersourcing at Scale to Overcome Expert Blind Spots for Introductory Programming: A Three-Year Deployment Study on the Python Tutor Website , 2020, L@S.
[14] David Carless,et al. From teacher transmission of information to student feedback literacy: Activating the learner role in feedback processes , 2020, Active Learning in Higher Education.
[15] W. Viechtbauer,et al. Theories of the generation effect and the impact of generation constraint: A meta-analytic review , 2020, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
[16] D. Gašević,et al. A collaborative learning approach to dialogic peer feedback: a theoretical framework , 2020, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.
[17] Sally Hamouda,et al. Mapping the Landscape of Peer Review in Computing Education Research , 2020, ITiCSE-WGR.
[18] John C. Stamper,et al. Evaluating Crowdsourcing and Topic Modeling in Generating Knowledge Components from Explanations , 2020, AIED.
[19] Susan Bull,et al. There are Open Learner Models About! , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.
[20] Don Hong,et al. BERT Feature Based Model for Predicting the Helpfulness Scores of Online Customers Reviews , 2020 .
[21] Dragan Gasevic,et al. Development and Adoption of an Adaptive Learning System: Reflections and Lessons Learned , 2020, SIGCSE.
[22] C. Mercader,et al. Factors influencing students’ peer feedback uptake: instructional design matters , 2020 .
[23] Hadeel S. Alenezi,et al. Utilizing crowdsourcing and machine learning in education: Literature review , 2020, Education and Information Technologies.
[24] Purnamrita Sarkar,et al. On hyperparameter tuning in general clustering problems , 2020 .
[25] Imad H. Elhajj,et al. Modelling Cognitive Bias in Crowdsourcing Systems , 2019, Cognitive Systems Research.
[26] Joseph Jay Williams,et al. RiPPLE: A Crowdsourced Adaptive Platform for Recommendation of Learning Activities , 2019, J. Learn. Anal..
[27] Satoshi Oyama,et al. Bayesian probabilistic tensor factorization for recommendation and rating aggregation with multicriteria evaluation data , 2019, Expert Syst. Appl..
[28] Klaus-Robert Müller,et al. Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligence , 2019, Explainable AI.
[29] Iryna Gurevych,et al. Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks , 2019, EMNLP.
[30] Victor S. Sheng,et al. Ensemble Learning from Crowds , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.
[31] Jacob Whitehill,et al. Do Learners Know What's Good for Them? Crowdsourcing Subjective Ratings of OERs to Predict Learning Gains , 2019, EDM.
[32] Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al. UpGrade: Sourcing Student Open-Ended Solutions to Create Scalable Learning Opportunities , 2019, L@S.
[33] Miao Fan,et al. Product-Aware Helpfulness Prediction of Online Reviews , 2019, WWW.
[34] Gang Kou,et al. A review on trust propagation and opinion dynamics in social networks and group decision making frameworks , 2019, Inf. Sci..
[35] Benjamin I. P. Rubinstein,et al. Truth Inference at Scale: A Bayesian Model for Adjudicating Highly Redundant Crowd Annotations , 2019, WWW.
[36] Maurizio Naldi,et al. A review of sentiment computation methods with R packages , 2019, ArXiv.
[37] Dapeng Tao,et al. Domain-Weighted Majority Voting for Crowdsourcing , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.
[38] Tian Tian,et al. Max-Margin Majority Voting for Learning from Crowds , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.
[39] Ming-Wei Chang,et al. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding , 2019, NAACL.
[40] David Boud,et al. Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work , 2018 .
[41] Rishi Desai,et al. Crowdsourcing for assessment items to support adaptive learning , 2018, Medical teacher.
[42] David Boud,et al. The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback , 2018 .
[43] Bo An,et al. Optimal Spot-Checking for Improving Evaluation Accuracy of Peer Grading Systems , 2018, AAAI.
[44] Helen Purchase,et al. Peer-review in practice: eight years of Aropä , 2018 .
[45] Paul Denny,et al. Collaborative learning with PeerWise , 2018 .
[46] Satoshi Oyama,et al. Collaborative filtering and rating aggregation based on multicriteria rating , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data).
[47] Paul Denny,et al. Formative student-authored question bank: perceptions, question quality and association with summative performance , 2017, Postgraduate Medical Journal.
[48] Hassan Khosravi,et al. RiPLE: Recommendation in Peer-Learning Environments Based on Knowledge Gaps and Interests , 2017, EDM.
[49] Guoliang Li,et al. Truth Inference in Crowdsourcing: Is the Problem Solved? , 2017, Proc. VLDB Endow..
[50] John Sweller,et al. Relations between the worked example and generation effects on immediate and delayed tests , 2016 .
[51] George Kurian,et al. Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translation , 2016, ArXiv.
[52] David C. Parkes,et al. Practical Peer Prediction for Peer Assessment , 2016, HCOMP.
[53] Leah P. Macfadyen,et al. Whose feedback? A multilevel analysis of student completion of end-of-term teaching evaluations , 2016 .
[54] Rodney D. Myers,et al. Instructional-Design Theories and Models, Volume IV : The Learner-Centered Paradigm of Education , 2016 .
[55] Neil T. Heffernan,et al. AXIS: Generating Explanations at Scale with Learnersourcing and Machine Learning , 2016, L@S.
[56] Elena L. Glassman,et al. Learnersourcing Personalized Hints , 2016, CSCW.
[57] Neil T. Heffernan,et al. The Future of Adaptive Learning: Does the Crowd Hold the Key? , 2016, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
[58] Bertrand K. Hassani. The Consensus Approach , 2016 .
[59] Gavin T. L. Brown,et al. The Future of Student Self-Assessment: a Review of Known Unknowns and Potential Directions , 2016 .
[60] Hamid Hassanpour,et al. A Geometric View of Similarity Measures in Data Mining , 2015 .
[61] Wolf-Tilo Balke,et al. A Majority of Wrongs Doesn't Make It Right - On Crowdsourcing Quality for Skewed Domain Tasks , 2015, WISE.
[62] Peng Dai,et al. Got Many Labels?: Deriving Topic Labels from Multiple Sources for Social Media Posts using Crowdsourcing and Ensemble Learning , 2015, WWW.
[63] Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al. Learnersourcing Subgoal Labels for How-to Videos , 2015, CSCW.
[64] Kevin Leyton-Brown,et al. Mechanical TA: Partially Automated High-Stakes Peer Grading , 2015, SIGCSE.
[65] Simon Burns,et al. Doing it for themselves: students creating a high quality peer-learning environment , 2015 .
[66] Juho Kim,et al. Improving learning with collective learner activity , 2015 .
[67] Sanjay Krishnan,et al. A methodology for learning, analyzing, and mitigating social influence bias in recommender systems , 2014, RecSys '14.
[68] Luca de Alfaro,et al. CrowdGrader: a tool for crowdsourcing the evaluation of homework assignments , 2014, SIGCSE.
[69] Simon Bates,et al. Assessing the quality of a student-generated question repository , 2013, 1308.2202.
[70] R. Bjork,et al. Self-regulated learning: beliefs, techniques, and illusions. , 2013, Annual review of psychology.
[71] Matthew Lease,et al. Improving Quality of Crowdsourced Labels via Probabilistic Matrix Factorization , 2012, HCOMP@AAAI.
[72] Yoshua Bengio,et al. Random Search for Hyper-Parameter Optimization , 2012, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[73] Mitchell J. Nathan,et al. Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology , 2012 .
[74] Bin Bi,et al. Iterative Learning for Reliable Crowdsourcing Systems , 2012 .
[75] Philip S. Yu,et al. Review Graph Based Online Store Review Spammer Detection , 2011, 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining.
[76] Young Hoan Cho,et al. Peer reviewers learn from giving comments , 2011 .
[77] Hamid Hassanpour,et al. A regression-based approach for measuring similarity in discrete signals , 2011 .
[78] Peter A. Flach,et al. A Coherent Interpretation of AUC as a Measure of Aggregated Classification Performance , 2011, ICML.
[79] Diane J. Litman,et al. Understanding Differences in Perceived Peer-Review Helpfulness using Natural Language Processing , 2011, BEA@ACL.
[80] Diane J. Litman,et al. Automatically Predicting Peer-Review Helpfulness , 2011, ACL.
[81] Kwangsu Cho,et al. Learning by reviewing , 2011 .
[82] A. Darvishi,et al. Translation Invariant Approach for Measuring Similarity of Signals , 2010 .
[83] M. Garner,et al. Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers' reflections on their practices , 2010 .
[84] Gerardo Hermosillo,et al. Learning From Crowds , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[85] Charles Elkan,et al. Expectation Maximization Algorithm , 2010, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.
[86] Lior Rokach,et al. Ensemble-based classifiers , 2010, Artificial Intelligence Review.
[87] Theodoros Damoulas,et al. Pattern Recognition , 1998, Encyclopedia of Information Systems.
[88] Xin Yao,et al. Diversity analysis on imbalanced data sets by using ensemble models , 2009, 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining.
[89] Beth Simon,et al. Quality of student contributed questions using PeerWise , 2009, ACE '09.
[90] Steve Joordens,et al. Peering into large lectures: examining peer and expert mark agreement using peerScholar, an online peer assessment tool , 2008, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[91] John Hamer,et al. PeerWise: students sharing their multiple choice questions , 2008, ICER '08.
[92] C. Reigeluth,et al. The Learner-Centered Paradigm of Education , 2008 .
[93] H. Marsh,et al. Improving the Peer-review Process for Grant Applications , 2022 .
[94] Ok-Choon Park,et al. Adaptive Instructional Systems , 2007 .
[95] Ming Zhou,et al. Low-Quality Product Review Detection in Opinion Summarization , 2007, EMNLP.
[96] Zhu Zhang,et al. Utility scoring of product reviews , 2006, CIKM '06.
[97] John A. Ross. The Reliability, Validity, and Utility of Self-Assessment , 2006 .
[98] Soo-Min Kim,et al. Automatically Assessing Review Helpfulness , 2006, EMNLP.
[99] D. Carless,et al. Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment , 2006 .
[100] Ramanathan V. Guha,et al. Propagation of trust and distrust , 2004, WWW '04.