Party Fragmentation and Presidential Elections in Post-Communist Democracies

Despite its controversial status as a stable governmental form, many of today's societies attempting to make the transition to democracy have or will, for a variety of reasons, choose presidentialism. Meanwhile, the evidence suggests that the combination of presidentialism and multipartism is especially dangerous for democratic stability (Mainwaring 1994). The question this essay addresses, though, is whether presidential elections themselves serve to encourage a fragmented party system, at least in the initial stages of democratization. In transitional political systems presidential elections encourage party fragmentation, but in a way different from that of highly proportional purely parliamentary mechanisms. Specifically, parties proliferate to support the presidential aspirations of political elites. Multivariate regression analysis on cross-sectional aggregate electoral data, supported by extensive outliers diagnostics and assessments of the role of country-specific effects is applied. A nested model is used to discriminate among the secondary hypotheses. Controls include: parliamentary election rules (district magnitude, threshold for representation, adjustment districts, ballot structure), relative timing of presidential and parliamentary elections, and basic societal cleavage structure. Using as our data source the recent elections in East and Central Europe and the European part of the former Soviet Union, we show that presidential elections consistently significantly increase party fragmentation. At the same time, the data are consistent with the hypothesis that presidentialism does encourage the overall consolidation in party systems through voters' abandonment of some parties, akin to Duverger's 'psychological effect'.

[1]  D. Hill,et al.  The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws , 1969 .

[2]  Thomas R. Palfrey,et al.  A mathematical proof of Duverger's Law , 1988 .

[3]  J. Linz.  The Perils of Presidentialism , 2008 .

[4]  Areno Lijphart,et al.  A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies 1945-1990 , 1995 .

[5]  A. Stepan,et al.  Constitutional Frameworks and Democratic Consolidation: Parliamentarianism versus Presidentialism , 1993, World Politics.

[6]  M. Duverger.  Political Parties Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State , 1964 .

[7]  Ronaldo Munck,et al.  The failure of presidential democracy , 1996 .

[8]  T. Power,et al.  Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. , 1996 .

[9]  M. Jones.  Electoral laws and the survival of presidential democracies. , 1994 .

[10]  Peter C. Ordeshook,et al.  Elections with limited information: A fulfilled expectations model using contemporaneous poll and endorsement data as information sources , 1985 .

[11]  Sergio Fabbrini,et al.  Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics , 1996 .

[12]  Boian Iordanov Koulov.  Geography of electoral preferences: the 1990 Great National Assembly elections in Bulgaria , 1995 .

[13]  B. Geddes.  A Comparative Perspective on the Leninist Legacy in Eastern Europe , 1995 .

[14]  Peter C. Ordeshook,et al.  Ethnic Heterogeneity, District Magnitude, and the Number of Parties , 1994 .

[15]  Matthew Soberg Shugart,et al.  Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems , 1989 .

[16]  G. Sartori.  Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis , 1977 .

[17]  Arend Lijphart.  Parliamentary versus presidential government , 1992 .

[18]  K. Jasiewicz.  Structures of Representation , 1993 .

[19]  H. White.  A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[20]  Ruth C. Silva,et al.  Making votes count , 1963 .

[21]  David A. Belsley,et al.  Regression Analysis and its Application: A Data-Oriented Approach.@@@Applied Linear Regression.@@@Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity , 1981 .

[22]  Ivars Peterson,et al.  Making votes count , 1963 .

[23]  D. Horowitz.  Presidents vs. Parliaments: Comparing Democratic Systems , 2008 .

[24]  Arend Lijphart,et al.  The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws, 1945–85 , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[25]  T. Feddersen,et al.  A Voting Model Implying Duverger's Law and Positive Turnout , 1992 .

[26]  Martin J. Collo.  Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America , 1997 .

[27]  Octavio Amorim Neto,et al.  Electoral institutions,cleavage structures,and the number of parties , 1997 .