Age-related changes in the neural dynamics of bottom-up and top-down processing during visual object recognition: an electrophysiological investigation
暂无分享,去创建一个
Elena K. Festa | Leslie Y Lai | Romy Froemer | William C. Heindel | E. Festa | W. Heindel | R. Frömer | Leslie Y. Lai
[1] D H Brainard,et al. The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[2] C. Owsley. Aging and vision , 2011, Vision Research.
[3] W. Ziegler. The Oxford Handbook Of Event Related Potential Components , 2016 .
[4] A. Borst. Seeing smells: imaging olfactory learning in bees , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.
[5] S. Shimozaki,et al. Visual discrimination in noise: Behavioural correlates of age-related cortical decline , 2013, Behavioural Brain Research.
[6] D. Bates,et al. Balancing Type I Error and Power in Linear Mixed Models , 2015, 1511.01864.
[7] M. Eimer. Effects of face inversion on the structural encoding and recognition of faces. Evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[8] A. N. Gusev,et al. Categorization of unilaterally presented emotional words: an ERP analysis. , 2000, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.
[9] L. Deouell,et al. Synchronous contextual irregularities affect early scene processing: Replication and extension , 2014, Neuropsychologia.
[10] M. Bar,et al. Magnocellular Projections as the Trigger of Top-Down Facilitation in Recognition , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[11] Moreno I. Coco,et al. Fixation-related brain activity during semantic integration of object-scene information , 2018 .
[12] Jodi L. Davenport. Consistency effects between objects in scenes , 2007, Memory & cognition.
[13] Denise C. Park,et al. Aging reduces neural specialization in ventral visual cortex. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[14] David J. Madden,et al. Searching from the Top Down: Ageing and Attentional Guidance during Singleton Detection , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[15] Werner Sommer,et al. Seeing what we know and understand: How knowledge shapes perception , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[16] J. Yesavage,et al. Context processing in older adults: evidence for a theory relating cognitive control to neurobiology in healthy aging. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[17] Filip Loncke,et al. The handbook of psycholinguistic and cognitive processes : perspectives in communication disorders , 2011 .
[18] C. Randolph,et al. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): preliminary clinical validity. , 1998, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.
[19] Arnaud Delorme,et al. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.
[20] M. Fabre-Thorpe,et al. Object recognition in congruent and incongruent natural scenes: A life-span study , 2013, Vision Research.
[21] M. Boucart,et al. Influence of Visual Deficits on Object Categorization in Normal Aging , 2013, Experimental aging research.
[22] R. Knight,et al. Age-related top-down suppression deficit in the early stages of cortical visual memory processing , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[23] M. Fabre-Thorpe,et al. Humans and monkeys share visual representations , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[24] R. Moran,et al. Inputs to prefrontal cortex support visual recognition in the aging brain , 2016, Scientific Reports.
[25] George L. Malcolm,et al. ERP correlates of spatially incongruent object identification during scene viewing: Contextual expectancy versus simultaneous processing , 2012, Neuropsychologia.
[26] Denis G. Pelli,et al. ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.
[27] Rasha Abdel Rahman,et al. Group-Level EEG-Processing Pipeline for Flexible Single Trial-Based Analyses Including Linear Mixed Models , 2018, Front. Neurosci..
[28] T. Salthouse. The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. , 1996, Psychological review.
[29] Adam Gazzaley,et al. Expectation-Driven Changes in Cortical Functional Connectivity Influence Working Memory and Long-Term Memory Performance , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[30] Event-related potential correlates of repetition priming and stimulus classification in young, middle-aged, and older adults. , 1992, Journal of gerontology.
[31] S J Luck,et al. Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. I. Evidence for early selection. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[32] Hauke R. Heekeren,et al. Normal Aging Delays and Compromises Early Multifocal Visual Attention during Object Tracking , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[33] J. Tanaka,et al. A Neural Basis for Expert Object Recognition , 2001, Psychological science.
[34] J. Wolfe,et al. Differential Electrophysiological Signatures of Semantic and Syntactic Scene Processing , 2013, Psychological science.
[35] Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al. Early interference of context congruence on object processing in rapid visual categorization of natural scenes. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[36] E. Halgren,et al. Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[37] M. Bar. Visual objects in context , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[38] M. Bar,et al. Prediction, context, and competition in visual recognition , 2015, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[39] Adam Gazzaley,et al. Diminished Top-Down Control Underlies a Visual Imagery Deficit in Normal Aging , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[40] Ali K. Bourisly,et al. Neurophysiological Effects of Aging: A P200 ERP Study , 2018, Translational neuroscience.
[41] T. Salthouse,et al. Speed and knowledge as determinants of adult age differences in verbal tasks. , 1993, Journal of gerontology.
[42] Marta Kutas,et al. Sounds, words, sentences: age-related changes across levels of language processing. , 2003, Psychology and aging.
[43] M. Kutas,et al. The N400 in a semantic categorization task across 6 decades. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[44] Michael W. L. Chee,et al. Age-related Changes in Object Processing and Contextual Binding Revealed Using fMR Adaptation , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[45] R. D. Gordon,et al. Contextual influences on rapid object categorization in natural scenes , 2011, Brain Research.
[46] M. Bar,et al. The parahippocampal cortex mediates spatial and nonspatial associations. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.
[47] D G Pelli,et al. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[48] M. Bar,et al. Top-down facilitation of visual object recognition: object-based and context-based contributions. , 2006, Progress in brain research.
[49] Patrick Berg,et al. Artifact Correction of the Ongoing EEG Using Spatial Filters Based on Artifact and Brain Signal Topographies , 2002, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.
[50] Jodi L. Davenport,et al. Scene Consistency in Object and Background Perception , 2004, Psychological science.
[51] M. Bar,et al. The role of the parahippocampal cortex in cognition , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[52] Michelle R. Greene,et al. What you see is what you expect: rapid scene understanding benefits from prior experience , 2015, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
[53] M. Gazzaniga,et al. Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans , 1994, Nature.
[54] Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al. Processing scene context: Fast categorization and object interference , 2007, Vision Research.
[55] Theodore P. Zanto,et al. Delays in neural processing during working memory encoding in normal aging , 2010, Neuropsychologia.
[56] M. Bar,et al. Cortical Analysis of Visual Context , 2003, Neuron.
[57] Robert C. Welsh,et al. Decreased neural specialization in old adults on a working memory task , 2006, Neuroreport.
[58] Thomas Serre,et al. A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[59] Nick Donnelly,et al. Nontarget objects can influence perceptual processes during object recognition , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[60] L. Deouell,et al. ERP evidence for context congruity effects during simultaneous object–scene processing , 2010, Neuropsychologia.
[61] L. Abrams,et al. Language Processing in Normal Aging , 2010 .
[62] S. Dufau,et al. An ERP Investigation of Object-Scene Incongruity: The Early Meeting of Knowledge and Perception , 2018 .
[63] D. Woods,et al. Age-related changes in processing auditory stimuli during visual attention: evidence for deficits in inhibitory control and sensory memory. , 1999, Psychology and aging.
[64] David J Madden,et al. Overriding age differences in attentional capture with top-down processing. , 2007, Psychology and aging.
[65] D. Bates,et al. Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .
[66] W. Perlstein,et al. Orbitofrontal Cortex and the Early Processing of Visual Novelty in Healthy Aging , 2016, Front. Aging Neurosci..
[67] Matthew M. Doran,et al. The role of visual attention in multiple object tracking: Evidence from ERPs , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[68] M. Rugg,et al. Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of pictures , 1990, Brain and Cognition.
[69] T. Horowitz,et al. Attentional enhancement during multiple-object tracking , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[70] Arthur F. Kramer,et al. Dedifferentiation in the visual cortex: An fMRI investigation of individual differences in older adults , 2008, Brain Research.
[71] James Elliott,et al. Rapid reconfiguration reduces the attentional blink , 2010 .
[72] Olivier R. Joubert,et al. The bear before the forest, but the city before the cars: Revealing early object/background processing , 2010 .
[73] J. Faubert,et al. Larger effect of aging on the perception of higher-order stimuli , 2000, Vision Research.
[74] Salil H. Patel,et al. Impact of instructed relevance on the visual ERP. , 2004, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.
[75] M. Tarr,et al. The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.
[76] M. Kutas,et al. Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words , 1980, Biological Psychology.
[77] M. Brodeur,et al. ERP evidence for the influence of scene context on the recognition of ambiguous and unambiguous objects , 2015, Neuropsychologia.
[78] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.
[79] M. Kutas,et al. An electrophysiological study of scene effects on object identification. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[80] A. Jacobs,et al. Event-Related Potentials Reveal Rapid Verification of Predicted Visual Input , 2009, PloS one.
[81] D. Tucker,et al. Frontal evaluation and posterior representation in target detection. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[82] Monica Fabiani,et al. Reduced Suppression or Labile Memory? Mechanisms of Inefficient Filtering of Irrelevant Information in Older Adults , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[83] Denise C. Park,et al. Neural Broadening or Neural Attenuation? Investigating Age-Related Dedifferentiation in the Face Network in a Large Lifespan Sample , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[84] P. Holcomb. Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. , 2007, Psychophysiology.
[85] A. Torralba,et al. The role of context in object recognition , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.