Age-related changes in the neural dynamics of bottom-up and top-down processing during visual object recognition: an electrophysiological investigation

When recognizing objects in our environments, we rely on both what we see and what we know. While elderly adults have been found to display increased sensitivity to top-down influences of contextual information during object recognition, the locus of this increased sensitivity remains unresolved. To address this issue, we examined the effects of aging on the neural dynamics of bottom-up and top-down visual processing during rapid object recognition. Specific EEG ERP components indexing bottom-up and top-down processes along the visual processing stream were assessed while systematically manipulating the degree of object ambiguity and scene context congruity. An increase in early attentional feedback mechanisms (as indexed by N1) as well as a functional reallocation of executive attentional resources (as indexed by P200) prior to object identification were observed in elderly adults, while post-perceptual semantic integration (as indexed by N400) remained intact. These findings suggest that compromised bottom-up perceptual processing of visual input in healthy aging leads to an increased involvement of top-down processes to resolve greater perceptual ambiguity during object recognition.

[1]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[2]  C. Owsley Aging and vision , 2011, Vision Research.

[3]  W. Ziegler The Oxford Handbook Of Event Related Potential Components , 2016 .

[4]  A. Borst Seeing smells: imaging olfactory learning in bees , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  S. Shimozaki,et al.  Visual discrimination in noise: Behavioural correlates of age-related cortical decline , 2013, Behavioural Brain Research.

[6]  D. Bates,et al.  Balancing Type I Error and Power in Linear Mixed Models , 2015, 1511.01864.

[7]  M. Eimer Effects of face inversion on the structural encoding and recognition of faces. Evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[8]  A. N. Gusev,et al.  Categorization of unilaterally presented emotional words: an ERP analysis. , 2000, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.

[9]  L. Deouell,et al.  Synchronous contextual irregularities affect early scene processing: Replication and extension , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  M. Bar,et al.  Magnocellular Projections as the Trigger of Top-Down Facilitation in Recognition , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Moreno I. Coco,et al.  Fixation-related brain activity during semantic integration of object-scene information , 2018 .

[12]  Jodi L. Davenport Consistency effects between objects in scenes , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Denise C. Park,et al.  Aging reduces neural specialization in ventral visual cortex. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  David J. Madden,et al.  Searching from the Top Down: Ageing and Attentional Guidance during Singleton Detection , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[15]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Seeing what we know and understand: How knowledge shapes perception , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  J. Yesavage,et al.  Context processing in older adults: evidence for a theory relating cognitive control to neurobiology in healthy aging. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  Filip Loncke,et al.  The handbook of psycholinguistic and cognitive processes : perspectives in communication disorders , 2011 .

[18]  C. Randolph,et al.  The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): preliminary clinical validity. , 1998, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[19]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  M. Fabre-Thorpe,et al.  Object recognition in congruent and incongruent natural scenes: A life-span study , 2013, Vision Research.

[21]  M. Boucart,et al.  Influence of Visual Deficits on Object Categorization in Normal Aging , 2013, Experimental aging research.

[22]  R. Knight,et al.  Age-related top-down suppression deficit in the early stages of cortical visual memory processing , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  M. Fabre-Thorpe,et al.  Humans and monkeys share visual representations , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  R. Moran,et al.  Inputs to prefrontal cortex support visual recognition in the aging brain , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[25]  George L. Malcolm,et al.  ERP correlates of spatially incongruent object identification during scene viewing: Contextual expectancy versus simultaneous processing , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[27]  Rasha Abdel Rahman,et al.  Group-Level EEG-Processing Pipeline for Flexible Single Trial-Based Analyses Including Linear Mixed Models , 2018, Front. Neurosci..

[28]  T. Salthouse The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. , 1996, Psychological review.

[29]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Expectation-Driven Changes in Cortical Functional Connectivity Influence Working Memory and Long-Term Memory Performance , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Event-related potential correlates of repetition priming and stimulus classification in young, middle-aged, and older adults. , 1992, Journal of gerontology.

[31]  S J Luck,et al.  Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. I. Evidence for early selection. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[32]  Hauke R. Heekeren,et al.  Normal Aging Delays and Compromises Early Multifocal Visual Attention during Object Tracking , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  J. Tanaka,et al.  A Neural Basis for Expert Object Recognition , 2001, Psychological science.

[34]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Differential Electrophysiological Signatures of Semantic and Syntactic Scene Processing , 2013, Psychological science.

[35]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Early interference of context congruence on object processing in rapid visual categorization of natural scenes. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[36]  E. Halgren,et al.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  M. Bar Visual objects in context , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[38]  M. Bar,et al.  Prediction, context, and competition in visual recognition , 2015, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Diminished Top-Down Control Underlies a Visual Imagery Deficit in Normal Aging , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Ali K. Bourisly,et al.  Neurophysiological Effects of Aging: A P200 ERP Study , 2018, Translational neuroscience.

[41]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Speed and knowledge as determinants of adult age differences in verbal tasks. , 1993, Journal of gerontology.

[42]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Sounds, words, sentences: age-related changes across levels of language processing. , 2003, Psychology and aging.

[43]  M. Kutas,et al.  The N400 in a semantic categorization task across 6 decades. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[44]  Michael W. L. Chee,et al.  Age-related Changes in Object Processing and Contextual Binding Revealed Using fMR Adaptation , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  R. D. Gordon,et al.  Contextual influences on rapid object categorization in natural scenes , 2011, Brain Research.

[46]  M. Bar,et al.  The parahippocampal cortex mediates spatial and nonspatial associations. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[47]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[48]  M. Bar,et al.  Top-down facilitation of visual object recognition: object-based and context-based contributions. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[49]  Patrick Berg,et al.  Artifact Correction of the Ongoing EEG Using Spatial Filters Based on Artifact and Brain Signal Topographies , 2002, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[50]  Jodi L. Davenport,et al.  Scene Consistency in Object and Background Perception , 2004, Psychological science.

[51]  M. Bar,et al.  The role of the parahippocampal cortex in cognition , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  Michelle R. Greene,et al.  What you see is what you expect: rapid scene understanding benefits from prior experience , 2015, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[53]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans , 1994, Nature.

[54]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Processing scene context: Fast categorization and object interference , 2007, Vision Research.

[55]  Theodore P. Zanto,et al.  Delays in neural processing during working memory encoding in normal aging , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[56]  M. Bar,et al.  Cortical Analysis of Visual Context , 2003, Neuron.

[57]  Robert C. Welsh,et al.  Decreased neural specialization in old adults on a working memory task , 2006, Neuroreport.

[58]  Thomas Serre,et al.  A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  Nick Donnelly,et al.  Nontarget objects can influence perceptual processes during object recognition , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[60]  L. Deouell,et al.  ERP evidence for context congruity effects during simultaneous object–scene processing , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[61]  L. Abrams,et al.  Language Processing in Normal Aging , 2010 .

[62]  S. Dufau,et al.  An ERP Investigation of Object-Scene Incongruity: The Early Meeting of Knowledge and Perception , 2018 .

[63]  D. Woods,et al.  Age-related changes in processing auditory stimuli during visual attention: evidence for deficits in inhibitory control and sensory memory. , 1999, Psychology and aging.

[64]  David J Madden,et al.  Overriding age differences in attentional capture with top-down processing. , 2007, Psychology and aging.

[65]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[66]  W. Perlstein,et al.  Orbitofrontal Cortex and the Early Processing of Visual Novelty in Healthy Aging , 2016, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[67]  Matthew M. Doran,et al.  The role of visual attention in multiple object tracking: Evidence from ERPs , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[68]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of pictures , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[69]  T. Horowitz,et al.  Attentional enhancement during multiple-object tracking , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[70]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Dedifferentiation in the visual cortex: An fMRI investigation of individual differences in older adults , 2008, Brain Research.

[71]  James Elliott,et al.  Rapid reconfiguration reduces the attentional blink , 2010 .

[72]  Olivier R. Joubert,et al.  The bear before the forest, but the city before the cars: Revealing early object/background processing , 2010 .

[73]  J. Faubert,et al.  Larger effect of aging on the perception of higher-order stimuli , 2000, Vision Research.

[74]  Salil H. Patel,et al.  Impact of instructed relevance on the visual ERP. , 2004, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[75]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.

[76]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words , 1980, Biological Psychology.

[77]  M. Brodeur,et al.  ERP evidence for the influence of scene context on the recognition of ambiguous and unambiguous objects , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[78]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[79]  M. Kutas,et al.  An electrophysiological study of scene effects on object identification. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[80]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Event-Related Potentials Reveal Rapid Verification of Predicted Visual Input , 2009, PloS one.

[81]  D. Tucker,et al.  Frontal evaluation and posterior representation in target detection. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[82]  Monica Fabiani,et al.  Reduced Suppression or Labile Memory? Mechanisms of Inefficient Filtering of Irrelevant Information in Older Adults , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[83]  Denise C. Park,et al.  Neural Broadening or Neural Attenuation? Investigating Age-Related Dedifferentiation in the Face Network in a Large Lifespan Sample , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[84]  P. Holcomb Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[85]  A. Torralba,et al.  The role of context in object recognition , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.