An investigation into sustainable product conceptualization using a design knowledge hierarchy and Hopfield network

In recent years, there has been a paradigm shift on providing design services from manufacturing/marketing to sustainability. Although a number of studies have been conducted on sustainable issues in many aspects, impacts such as multidisciplinary integration and product life-cycle consideration have not been thoroughly investigated. Therefore, it is worthwhile to investigate into the integration of functional, marketing, and commercial perspectives with product sustainability in the early stage of product conceptualization. In this study, a sustainable product conceptualization system (SPCS) is proposed. The product platform of a specific product is first generated by designers or domain experts using general sorting, a requirement acquisition technique, and design knowledge hierarchy (DKH), a knowledge representation structure. Based on the product platform, initial design options can be obtained using morphological configuration, i.e., combining different part options. Subsequently, the Hopfield network is used to narrow down initial design space based on initial design criteria solicited by domain experts. To select the preferred design options for the purpose of sustainable product conceptualization, the sustainability-cost pairs can be obtained based on the rated sustainability and cost criteria solicited using repertory grids by domain experts. Consequently, the results are discussed on the coordination between product sustainability degree and cost efficiency. A case study on cellular-phone design is conducted for system illustration.

[1]  V. Lakshmikantham,et al.  Practical Stability Of Nonlinear Systems , 1990 .

[2]  G. Kelly.  The Psychology of Personal Constructs , 2020 .

[3]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design Prototypes: A Knowledge Representation Schema for Design , 1990, AI Mag..

[4]  Miriam A. O'Shea.  Design for Environment in conceptual product design – a decision model to reflect environmental issues of all life-cycle phases , 2002 .

[5]  Li Pheng Khoo,et al.  A Radial Basis Function Neural Network Multicultural Factors Evaluation Engine For Product Concept Development , 2001, Expert Syst. J. Knowl. Eng..

[6]  Stuart Walker.  A journey in design – an exploration of perspectives for sustainability , 2002 .

[7]  Pierre Moszkowicz,et al.  Development of recovery indicators to be used during product design process: method, potentialities and limits , 2001 .

[8]  Jerry Jackson.  Making the Financial Case for Sustainable Design , 2008 .

[9]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  Ecodesign in the European Electr(on)ics Industry – An analysis of the current practices based on cases studies – An analysis of the current practices based on cases studies , 2001 .

[10]  Frieder Rubik.  Environmental sound product innovation and Integrated Product Policy (IPP) , 2001 .

[11]  Ab Stevels,et al.  Five ways to be green and profitable , 2001 .

[12]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Qualitative reasoning: Modeling and simulation with incomplete knowledge , 1994, Autom..

[13]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Peter McGeorge,et al.  The uses of ‘contrived’ knowledge elicitation techniques , 1992 .

[15]  Russell R. Barton,et al.  Graphical Methods for the Design of Experiments , 1999 .

[16]  Chun-Hsien Chen,et al.  A knowledge sorting process for a product design expert system , 1999, Expert Syst. J. Knowl. Eng..

[17]  A. Michel,et al.  Analysis and synthesis of a class of neural networks: linear systems operating on a closed hypercube , 1989 .

[18]  Wei Yan,et al.  An in-process customer utility prediction system for product conceptualisation , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  Lloyd M. Waugh,et al.  A Framework to Identify Opportunities for ICT Support when Implementing Sustainable Design Standards , 2006, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[20]  Yk Lim Youn-Kyung Lim,et al.  Encoding Scenarios with Design Information Framework for the Generation of Multiple Aspect Models for System Implementation , 2003 .

[21]  Weijian Mi,et al.  An integration of bidding-oriented product conceptualization and supply chain formation , 2008, Comput. Ind..

[22]  Laura R. Novick,et al.  To Matrix, Network, or Hierarchy: That Is the Question , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  Li Pheng Khoo,et al.  An integrated approach to the elicitation of customer requirements for engineering design using picture sorts and fuzzy evaluation , 2002, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[24]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  An approach to robust decision making under severe uncertainty in life cycle design , 2008 .

[25]  Neil A. M. Maiden,et al.  ACRE: selecting methods for requirements acquisition , 1996, Softw. Eng. J..

[26]  Simon Clay,et al.  Sustainability Victoria: influencing resource use, towards zero waste and sustainable production and consumption , 2007 .

[27]  Wade Shaw.  Innovation in New Product Development (Editorial) , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[28]  Joan Harvey,et al.  Lightbulbs and nappies: sustainable development and customer perceptions , 2008 .

[29]  Carlo Vezzoli,et al.  A new generation of designers: perspectives for education and training in the field of sustainable design. Experiences and projects at the Politecnico di Milano University , 2003 .