What's behind different kinds of kinds: effects of statistical density on learning and representation of categories.

This research examined how differences in category structure affect category learning and category representation across points of development. The authors specifically focused on category density--or the proportion of category-relevant variance to the total variance. Results of Experiments 1-3 showed a clear dissociation between dense and sparse categories: Whereas dense categories were readily learned without supervision, learning of sparse categories required supervision. There were also developmental differences in how statistical density affected category representation. Although children represented both dense and sparse categories on the basis of the overall similarity (Experiment 4A), adults represented dense categories on the basis of similarity and represented sparse categories on the basis of the inclusion rule (Experiment 4B). The results support the notion that statistical structure interacts with the learning regime in their effects on category learning. In addition, these results elucidate important developmental differences in how categories are represented, which presents interesting challenges for theories of categorization.

[1]  William M. Smith,et al.  A Study of Thinking , 1956 .

[2]  R. Shepard,et al.  Learning and memorization of classifications. , 1961 .

[3]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Free recall learning of visual figures as a function of form of internal structure. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  M. Posner,et al.  On the genesis of abstract ideas. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  G. Bower,et al.  Attention in Learning: Theory and Research , 1968 .

[6]  W. R. Garner Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts , 1975 .

[7]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  A. Reber Implicit learning of synthetic languages: The role of instructional set. , 1976 .

[9]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Context theory of classification learning. , 1978 .

[10]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[11]  Daniel F. Chambliss,et al.  Evolution of conceptual structure , 1979 .

[12]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[13]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[14]  J. Altham Naming and necessity. , 1981 .

[15]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Some interesting differences between nouns and verbs , 1981 .

[16]  D. Medin,et al.  Linear separability in classification learning. , 1981 .

[17]  E. R. Siqueland,et al.  The nature and structure of infant form categories , 1983 .

[18]  D. Medin,et al.  The role of theories in conceptual coherence. , 1985, Psychological review.

[19]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[20]  R. Nosofsky Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  R. Nosofsky Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986 .

[22]  L B Cohen,et al.  Developmental change in infants' perception of correlations among attributes. , 1986, Child development.

[23]  F. Keil Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development , 1989 .

[24]  Linda B. Smith From global similarities to kinds of similarities: the construction of dimensions in development , 1989 .

[25]  Douglas Vickers,et al.  Human Information Processing: Measures, Mechanisms, and Models , 1990 .

[26]  J. Kruschke,et al.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. , 1992, Psychological review.

[27]  R. Nosofsky Exemplars, prototypes, and similarity rules. , 1992 .

[28]  M. Gluck,et al.  Explaining Basic Categories: Feature Predictability and Information , 1992 .

[29]  D. Laplane Thought and language. , 1992, Behavioural neurology.

[30]  B. Younger,et al.  Understanding category members as "the same sort of thing": explicit categorization in ten-month infants. , 1993, Child development.

[31]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Evidence for Representations of Perceptually Similar Natural Categories by 3-Month-Old and 4-Month-Old Infants , 1993, Perception.

[32]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Studies on the formation of perceptually based basic-level categories in young infants. , 1994, Child development.

[33]  Robert L. Goldstone Similarity, interactive activation, and mapping , 1994 .

[34]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Similarity- versus rule-based categorization , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[35]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. , 1994, Psychological review.

[36]  Robert L. Goldstone Isolated and interrelated concepts , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[37]  P. Zelazo,et al.  An age-related dissociation between knowing rules and using them ☆ , 1996 .

[38]  James F. Knutson,et al.  Unsupervised Concept Learning and Value Systematicity: A Complex Whole Aids Learning the Parts , 1996 .

[39]  Gregory Ashby,et al.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. , 1998, Psychological review.

[40]  S. Sloman,et al.  Similarity as an explanatory construct , 1998, Cognition.

[41]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Alternative strategies of categorization , 1998, Cognition.

[42]  J. Kruschke,et al.  Rules and exemplars in category learning. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[43]  J. Hampton Similarity-based categorization and fuzziness of natural categories , 1998, Cognition.

[44]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[45]  Alice J. Corkill,et al.  Interference and Inhibition in Cognition and Behavior: Unifying Themes for Educational Psychology , 1999 .

[46]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Thirty categorization results in search of a model. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[47]  D. Medin,et al.  Are there kinds of concepts? , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[48]  F. Ashby,et al.  The effects of concurrent task interference on category learning: Evidence for multiple category learning systems , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[49]  E A Wasserman,et al.  Entropy and variability discrimination. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[50]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Prototypes in category learning: the effects of category size, category structure, and stimulus complexity. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[51]  L. Brooks,et al.  Specializing the operation of an explicit rule , 1991 .

[52]  James A. Hampton,et al.  Similarity and Categorization , 2001 .

[53]  P. Quinn,et al.  Categorization in infancy , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[54]  G. Murphy,et al.  The Big Book of Concepts , 2002 .

[55]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Memory and cognitive processes , 2002 .

[56]  B. Love Comparing supervised and unsupervised category learning , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[57]  Natasha Z. Kirkham,et al.  ARTICLE WITH PEER COMMENTARIES AND RESPONSE Helping children apply their knowledge to their behavior on a dimension-switching task , 2003 .

[58]  Karin Ackermann,et al.  Categories and Concepts , 2003, Job 28. Cognition in Context.

[59]  V. Sloutsky The role of similarity in the development of categorization , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[60]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Comparing categorization models. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[61]  V. Sloutsky,et al.  Induction and categorization in young children: a similarity-based model. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[62]  Martial Mermillod,et al.  The role of bottom-up processing in perceptual categorization by 3- to 4-month-old infants: simulations and data. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[63]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Semantic Cognition: A Parallel Distributed Processing Approach , 2004 .

[64]  Gilbert Harman,et al.  Semantics of natural language , 2004, Synthese.

[65]  Vladimir M Sloutsky,et al.  Is a picture worth a thousand words? The flexible nature of modality dominance in young children. , 2004, Child development.

[66]  M. FROM LEARNING THEORY TO CONNECTIONIST THEORY : Essays in Honor of , 2005 .

[67]  V. Sloutsky,et al.  Similarity, Induction, Naming, and Categorization (SINC): Generalization or Inductive Reasoning? Reply to Heit and Hayes (2005) , 2005 .

[68]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[69]  Helge Svare THE RELATIONAL CATEGORIES , 2006 .