Neutrosophic Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach for IoT-Based Enterprises

The Internet of Things (IoT) connects billions of devices to afford inventive opportunities between things and people. The rapid development of products related to the IoT is a new challenge to keep security issues, lack of confidence, and understanding of the IoT. Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is a classic multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) method used to analyze and scale complex problems and to obtain weights for the selected criteria. The vague and inconsistent information in real situations can lead to the decision maker’s confusion. The decision makers cannot determine accurate judgments for all situations due to the conditions of uncertainty factors in real life; in addition to the limited knowledge and experience of decision makers. In this research, we present a neutrosophic AHP of the IoT in enterprises to help decision makers to estimate the influential factors. The estimation of influential factors can affect the success of the IoT-related enterprise. This study combines AHP methods with neutrosophic techniques to effectively present the criteria related to influential factors. The recommended alternatives are presented based on neutrosophic techniques satisfying the estimated influential factors for a successful enterprise. A case study is applied in Smart Village, Cairo, Egypt, to show the applicability of the proposed model. The smart village’ consistency rate is measured after applying neutrosophic methodologies to reach to nearest optimum results. Additional case studies on the smart city in the U.K. and China have been presented to justify that our proposal can be used and replicated in different environments.

[1]  Xiaowei Xu,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  M. Thirumaran,et al.  Collaborative Web Service QoS Prediction with Multi-Criteria Decision Making Using CB-NIMF , 2015 .

[3]  Santoso Wibowo,et al.  Fuzzy Multicriteria Analysis for Performance Evaluation of Internet of Things Based Supply Chains , 2018 .

[4]  Wanan Cui,et al.  A group decision-making model for multi-criteria supplier selection in the presence of ordinal data , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics.

[5]  Wen-Hsiang Lai,et al.  Fuzzy AHP analysis of Internet of Things (IoT) in enterprises , 2018, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[6]  Onsiri Silasai,et al.  The Integration of Association Rules and AHP in Cloud Service Selection , 2018 .

[7]  Ahmed Aboelfetouh,et al.  An Integrated Neutrosophic-TOPSIS Approach and Its Application to Personnel Selection: A New Trend in Brain Processing and Analysis , 2019, IEEE Access.

[8]  Mohamed Abdel-Basset,et al.  A Hybrid Neutrosophic Group ANP-TOPSIS Framework for Supplier Selection Problems , 2018, Symmetry.

[9]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Multicriteria Group Decision Support for Information Systems Project Selection , 2009, IEA/AIE.

[10]  K. Lai,et al.  Responsive supply chain : A competitive strategy in a networked economy , 2008 .

[11]  Zhong-Zhong Jiang,et al.  Intuitionistic fuzzy Multicriteria group decision for evaluating and selecting information systems projects , 2013 .

[12]  Jie Lu,et al.  Decision Making in Multi-Issue e-Market Auction Using Fuzzy Techniques and Negotiable Attitudes , 2008, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[13]  Victor I. Chang,et al.  Towards a Reuse Strategic Decision Pattern Framework – from Theories to Practices , 2018, Information Systems Frontiers.

[14]  Mohamed Abdel-Basset,et al.  Internet of Things (IoT) and its impact on supply chain: A framework for building smart, secure and efficient systems , 2018, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[15]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: A logarithmic fuzzy preference programming methodology , 2011, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[16]  Wei Xu,et al.  Evaluation of Cloud Services: A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Method , 2016, Algorithms.

[17]  Santoso Wibowo,et al.  Consensus-based decision support for multicriteria group decision making , 2013, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[18]  Mohamed Abdel-Basset,et al.  Internet of things in smart education environment: Supportive framework in the decision‐making process , 2019, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[19]  F. Liu,et al.  The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier , 2005 .

[20]  Daizhong Su,et al.  EJB-MVC ORIENTED SUPPLIER SELECTION SYSTEM FOR MASS CUSTOMIZATION , 2007 .

[21]  Irene C. L. Ng,et al.  The Internet-of-Things: Review and research directions , 2017 .

[22]  Victor I. Chang,et al.  Neutrosophic Association Rule Mining Algorithm for Big Data Analysis , 2018, Symmetry.

[23]  B. Gaudenzi,et al.  Managing risks in the supply chain using the AHP method , 2006 .

[24]  Bhallamudi Ravi,et al.  Web based casting supplier evaluation using analytical hierarchy process , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[25]  Raquel Flórez López Strategic supplier selection in the added-value perspective: A CI approach , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[26]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management , 2006 .

[27]  M. Ramachandran,et al.  Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning--A review , 2004 .

[28]  Patrick Tague,et al.  Designing for self-configuration and self-adaptation in the Internet of Things , 2013, 9th IEEE International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing.

[29]  Naveen K. Chilamkurti,et al.  Three-way decisions based on neutrosophic sets and AHP-QFD framework for supplier selection problem , 2018, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[30]  Santoso Wibowo,et al.  Fuzzy Multicriteria Analysis for Performance Evaluation of Internet-of-Things-Based Supply Chains , 2018, Symmetry.

[31]  Júlíus Sólnes,et al.  Environmental quality indexing of large industrial development alternatives using AHP , 2003 .

[32]  Santoso Wibowo,et al.  Multi-criteria group decision making for evaluating the performance of e-waste recycling programs under uncertainty. , 2015, Waste management.

[33]  Victor I. Chang,et al.  NMCDA: A framework for evaluating cloud computing services , 2018, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[34]  Jiří Jaromír Klemeš,et al.  Sustainable enterprise resource planning systems implementation: A framework development , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[35]  F. Chan,et al.  Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach , 2007 .

[36]  Thomas L. Saaty How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1994 .

[37]  N. Anantharaman,et al.  A MULTI-CRITERIA GROUP DECISIONMAKING MODEL FOR SUPPLIER RATING , 2002 .

[38]  Carsten Magerkurth,et al.  IoT Reference Model , 2013 .

[39]  Ashutosh Sarkar,et al.  Evaluation of supplier capability and performance: A method for supply base reduction , 2006 .

[40]  Hing Kai Chan,et al.  Development of the supplier selection model—a case study in the advanced technology industry , 2004 .

[41]  Mai Mohamed,et al.  RETRACTED: The role of single valued neutrosophic sets and rough sets in smart city: Imperfect and incomplete information systems , 2018, Measurement.

[42]  Atsuo Yoshitaka,et al.  IoT-aware online shopping system enhanced with gaze analysis , 2016, 2016 World Automation Congress (WAC).

[43]  Seongcheol Kim,et al.  How and what to study about IoT: Research trends and future directions from the perspective of social science , 2017 .

[44]  Felix T.S. Chan,et al.  Interactive selection model for supplier selection process: an analytical hierarchy process approach , 2003 .

[45]  Hing Kai Chan,et al.  A decision support system for supplier selection in the airline industry , 2007 .

[46]  Mohamed Abdel-Basset,et al.  A hybrid approach of neutrosophic sets and DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria , 2018, Des. Autom. Embed. Syst..

[47]  T. Saaty How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[48]  Yongquan Zhou,et al.  Multi-criteria group decision making based on neutrosophic analytic hierarchy process , 2017, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..