Dynamic fleet-based life-cycle greenhouse gas assessment of the introduction of electric vehicles in the Portuguese light-duty fleet

PurposeReducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the transportation sector is the goal of several current policies and battery electric vehicles (BEVs) are seen as one option to achieve this goal. However, the introduction of BEVs in the fleet is gradual and their benefits will depend on how they compare with increasingly more energy-efficient internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). The aim of this article is to assess whether displacing ICEVs by BEVs in the Portuguese light-duty fleet is environmentally beneficial (focusing on GHG emissions), taking into account the dynamic behavior of the fleet.MethodsA dynamic fleet-based life-cycle assessment (LCA) of the Portuguese light-duty fleet was performed, addressing life-cycle (LC) GHG emissions through 2030 across different scenarios. A model was developed, integrating: (i) a vehicle stock sub-model of the Portuguese light-duty fleet; and (ii) dynamic LC sub-models of three vehicle technologies (gasoline ICEV, diesel ICEV and BEV). Two metrics were analyzed: (i) Total fleet LC GHG emissions (in Mton CO2 eq); and (ii) Fleet LC GHG emissions per kilometer (in g CO2 eq/km). A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the influence of different parameters in the results and ranking of scenarios.Results and discussionThe model baseline projected a reduction of 30–39 % in the 2010–2030 fleet LC GHG emissions depending on the BEV fleet penetration rate and ICEV fuel consumption improvements. However, for BEV introduction in the fleet to be beneficial compared to an increasingly more efficient ICEV fleet, a high BEV market share and electricity emission factor similar or lower to the current mix (485 g CO2 eq/kWh) need to be realized; these conclusions hold for the different conditions analyzed. Results were also sensitive to parameters that affect the fleet composition, such as those that change the vehicle stock, the scrappage rate, and the activity level of the fleet (11–19 % variation in GHG emissions in 2030), which are seldom assessed in the LCA of vehicles. The influence of these parameters also varies over time, becoming more important as time passes. These effects can only be captured by assessing Total fleet GHG emissions over time as opposed to the GHG emissions per kilometer metric.ConclusionsThese results emphasize the importance of taking into account the dynamic behavior of the fleet, technology improvements over time, and changes in vehicle operation and background processes during the vehicle service life when assessing the potential benefits of displacing ICEVs by BEVs.

[1]  Yoshihiro Adachi,et al.  Integration of Life Cycle assessment and population balance model for assessing environmental impacts of product population in a social scale case studies for the global warming potential of air conditioners in Japan , 2003 .

[2]  Lin Gao,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Environmental and Economic Impacts of Advanced Vehicles , 2012 .

[3]  Andreas Uihlein,et al.  How can our cars become less polluting? An assessment of the environmental improvement potential of cars , 2010 .

[4]  Sujit Das,et al.  The life-cycle impacts of aluminum body-in-white automotive material , 2000 .

[5]  Alexandre Lucas,et al.  Life cycle analysis of energy supply infrastructure for conventional and electric vehicles , 2012 .

[6]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[7]  Joeri Van Mierlo,et al.  Environmental impacts of hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and battery electric vehicles—what can we learn from life cycle assessment? , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[8]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  Time and scale in Life Cycle Assessment: the case of fuel choice in the transport sector , 2008 .

[9]  Joeri Van Mierlo,et al.  A Range-Based Vehicle Life Cycle Assessment Incorporating Variability in the Environmental Assessment of Different Vehicle Technologies and Fuels , 2014 .

[10]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Optimal household refrigerator replacement policy for life cycle energy, greenhouse gas emissions, and cost , 2006 .

[11]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  Modern individual mobility , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[12]  Anup Bandivadekar,et al.  Long-term greenhouse gas emission and petroleum reduction goals: Evolutionary pathways for the light-duty vehicle sector , 2010 .

[13]  Pedro Marques,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of electricity in Portugal , 2014 .

[14]  Marc Ross,et al.  History of Emissions Reduction: Normal Emitters in FTP-type Driving , 2001 .

[15]  Randolph Kirchain,et al.  Life‐Cycle Assessment and Temporal Distributions of Emissions: Developing a Fleet‐Based Analysis , 2000 .

[16]  M Melaina,et al.  Role of fuel carbon intensity in achieving 2050 greenhouse gas reduction goals within the light-duty vehicle sector. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  David L. McCleese,et al.  Using monte carlo simulation in life cycle assessment for electric and internal combustion vehicles , 2002 .

[18]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[19]  Kyle W Meisterling,et al.  Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from plug-in hybrid vehicles: implications for policy. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  John B. Heywood,et al.  The effect of uncertainty on US transport-related GHG emissions and fuel consumption out to 2050 , 2012 .

[21]  C. H. Cáceres,et al.  Transient environmental effects of light alloy substitutions in transport vehicles , 2009 .

[22]  Lynette W. Cheah,et al.  Cars on a diet : the material and energy impacts of passenger vehicle weight reduction in the U.S. , 2010 .

[23]  C. Miguel,et al.  MÉTODOS DE ESTIMATIVA DE VOLUMES ANUAIS DE TRÁFEGO RODOVIÁRIO UM MODELO PARA PORTUGAL , 2008 .

[24]  Michael Q. Wang,et al.  Material and energy flows in the materials production, assembly, and end-of-life stages of the automotive lithium-ion battery life cycle , 2014 .

[25]  Lynette Cheah,et al.  Meeting U.S. passenger vehicle fuel economy standards in 2016 and beyond , 2011 .

[26]  M. K. Singh,et al.  Multi-path transportation futures study : vehicle characterization and scenario analyses. , 2009 .

[27]  Filipe Moura,et al.  Electric vehicle diffusion in the Portuguese automobile market , 2016 .

[28]  Luis C. Dias,et al.  Stochastic comparative assessment of life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions from conventional and electric vehicles , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[29]  Sujit Das,et al.  Life cycle energy impacts of automotive liftgate inner , 2005 .

[30]  Rolf Frischknecht,et al.  Life cycle assessment of electric mobility: answers and challenges—Zurich, April 6, 2011 , 2011 .

[31]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Energy and environmental impacts of alternative pathways for the Portuguese road transportation sector , 2012 .

[32]  Troy R. Hawkins,et al.  Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles , 2013 .

[33]  Anibal T. de Almeida,et al.  Primary and secondary use of electric mobility batteries from a life cycle perspective , 2014 .

[34]  John B. Heywood,et al.  A Forward-Looking Stochastic Fleet Assessment Model for Analyzing the Impact of Uncertainties on Light-Duty Vehicles Fuel Use and Emissions , 2012 .

[35]  Hyung Chul Kim.  Shaping sustainable vehicle fleet conversion policies based on life cycle optimization and risk analysis. , 2003 .

[36]  Leduc Guillaume,et al.  Environmental Improvement of Passenger Cars (IMPRO-car) , 2008 .

[37]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Environmental impacts of hybrid and electric vehicles—a review , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[38]  Andrew E. Lutz,et al.  Comparison of the technical potential for hydrogen, battery electric, and conventional light-duty vehicles to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and petroleum consumption in the United States , 2013 .

[39]  Haley Jones,et al.  A system dynamics approach in LCA to account for temporal effects—a consequential energy LCI of car body-in-whites , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[40]  Marc Ross,et al.  OPTIMAL FLEET CONVERSION POLICY FROM A LIFE CYCLE PERSPECTIVE , 2004 .

[41]  John B. Heywood,et al.  U . S . CAFE Standards Potential for meeting light-duty vehicle fuel economy targets , 2016-2025 , 2012 .

[42]  F. Freire,et al.  Electric vehicles in Portugal: An integrated energy, greenhouse gas and cost life-cycle analysis , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology (ISSST).