A Graph-Based Socioeconomic Analysis of Steemit

Online social networks (OSNs) have changed the way of how people interact; however, lately, people are questioning more and more their business models. During the last ten years, new solutions based on decentralized architectures have been proposed, namely, decentralized OSNs (DOSNs) and blockchain online social medias (BOSMs). DOSNs were introduced several years ago and their main goal is the preservation of the privacy of the users in such a way that the data and the content of a user are always under their control. BOSMs leverage the usage of blockchain either to enforce the privacy of the users or to redistribute the wealth generated by the platform through a rewarding system. Steemit is the most stable and well-known BOSM with more than 1 million registered users, where users can create their own social network by following other users. To the best of our knowledge, no study exists on the relationship between the economic and social characteristics of BOSMs and on the way the rewarding system affects the social activity. The main goal of this article is to evaluate the characteristics of the Steemit follower–following graph to understand how the social and the economic aspects of BOSMs intertwine and influence each other. We study the properties of the Steemit follower–following graph and a few selected hotspot contents. The analysis shows that users are highly encouraged to be socially active, especially producing content, but the richest users are not also the most social ones, which suggests us that users can get rich without much involvement in the platform, using external mechanisms.

[1]  Refik Molva,et al.  Safebook: A privacy-preserving online social network leveraging on real-life trust , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[3]  Laura Ricci,et al.  The impact of user's availability on On-line Ego Networks: a Facebook analysis , 2016, Comput. Commun..

[4]  Barbara Guidi,et al.  Steem Blockchain: Mining the Inner Structure of the Graph , 2020, IEEE Access.

[5]  Barbara Guidi,et al.  Community evaluation in Facebook groups , 2019, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[6]  Marco Rosa,et al.  Four degrees of separation , 2011, WebSci '12.

[7]  Jimmy J. Lin,et al.  Information network or social network?: the structure of the twitter follow graph , 2014, WWW.

[8]  Le Jiang,et al.  BCOSN: A Blockchain-Based Decentralized Online Social Network , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems.

[9]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measurement and analysis of online social networks , 2007, IMC '07.

[10]  Sebastiano Vigna,et al.  Four Degrees of Separation, Really , 2012, 2012 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.

[11]  Sonja Buchegger,et al.  PeerSoN: P2P social networking: early experiences and insights , 2009, SNS '09.

[12]  Ralf Steinmetz,et al.  LifeSocial.KOM: A P2P-Based Platform for Secure Online Social Networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing (P2P).

[13]  Krzysztof Rzadca,et al.  Decentralized Online Social Networks , 2010, Handbook of Social Network Technologies.

[14]  Jong Hyuk Park,et al.  Social network security: Issues, challenges, threats, and solutions , 2017, Inf. Sci..

[15]  Laura Ricci,et al.  A survey on privacy in decentralized online social networks , 2018, Comput. Sci. Rev..

[16]  Mohsin Ur Rahman,et al.  Protecting Personal Data using Smart Contracts , 2019, IDCS.

[17]  Zibin Zheng,et al.  An Overview of Blockchain Technology: Architecture, Consensus, and Future Trends , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Congress on Big Data (BigData Congress).

[18]  Ralf Steinmetz,et al.  LifeSocial.KOM: A secure and P2P-based solution for online social networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC).

[19]  Laura Ricci,et al.  Managing social contents in Decentralized Online Social Networks: A survey , 2018, Online Soc. Networks Media.

[20]  Paolo Mori,et al.  An Analysis of the Internal Organization of Facebook Groups , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems.

[21]  Laura Ricci,et al.  DiDuSoNet: A P2P architecture for distributed Dunbar-based social networks , 2016, Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl..

[22]  Pablo A. Estévez,et al.  Selecting the Most Influential Nodes in Social Networks , 2007, 2007 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[23]  Y. Narahari,et al.  A Shapley Value-Based Approach to Discover Influential Nodes in Social Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[24]  Honggang Zhang,et al.  The growth of Diaspora - A decentralized online social network in the wild , 2012, 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM Workshops.

[25]  Balachander Krishnamurthy,et al.  A few chirps about twitter , 2008, WOSN '08.

[26]  Eileen A. Hogan The Attention Economy: Understanding the New Currency of Business , 2001 .

[27]  Jong Hyuk Park,et al.  SpamSpotter: An efficient spammer detection framework based on intelligent decision support system on Facebook , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[28]  Aggelos Kiayias,et al.  A Puff of Steem: Security Analysis of Decentralized Content Curation , 2018, Tokenomics.

[29]  Xiaowei Zhu,et al.  A Comparative Analysis on Weibo and Twitter , 2016 .

[30]  Barbara Guidi,et al.  When Blockchain meets Online Social Networks , 2020, Pervasive Mob. Comput..