Relicensing as a Secondary Market Strategy

Secondary markets in the information technology industry, where used or refurbished equipment is traded, have been growing steadily. For original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) in this industry, the importance of secondary markets has grown in parallel, not only as a source of revenue, but also because of their impact on these firms' competitive advantage and market strategy. Recent articles in the press have severely criticized some OEMs who are perceived to be actively trying to eliminate the secondary market for their products. Other OEMs have policies that enhance their secondary markets. The goal of this paper is to understand how an OEM's incentives and optimal strategies vis-a-vis the secondary market are shaped contingent on her relative competitive advantage, product characteristics, and consumer preferences. The critical trade-off that we examine is whether the indirect benefit from maintaining an active secondary market (the resale value effect) can outweigh the potentially negative effect of the sales of used products at the expense of new product sales (the cannibalization effect). To that end, we develop a durable good model where the OEM can directly affect the resale value of her product through a relicensing fee charged to the buyer of the refurbished equipment. We analyze the OEM's strategy in both the monopoly and the duopoly cases, characterize the optimal relicensing fee set by the OEM, and draw conclusions on the conditions that favor stimulating or deterring the secondary market. This paper was accepted by Candace A. Yano, operations and supply chain management.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Durable Goods and Product Obsolescence , 1989 .

[2]  Simon P. Anderson,et al.  Price discrimination via second-hand markets , 1994 .

[3]  Preyas S. Desai,et al.  Strategic Decentralization and Channel Coordination , 2004 .

[4]  Oded Koenigsberg,et al.  Research Note - The Role of Production Lead Time and Demand Uncertainty in Marketing Durable Goods , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Michael R. Galbreth,et al.  Optimal Acquisition and Sorting Policies for Remanufacturing , 2006 .

[6]  K. Srinivasan,et al.  Price Uncertainty and Consumer Search: A Structural Model of Consideration Set Formation , 2003 .

[7]  Necati Aras,et al.  Optimal Prices and Trade-in Rebates for Durable, Remanufacturable Products , 2005, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[8]  L. Beril Toktay,et al.  Market Segmentation and Product Technology Selection for Remanufacturable Products , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[9]  S. Rosen,et al.  Monopoly and product quality , 1978 .

[10]  I. Hendel,et al.  Interfering with Secondary Markets , 1999 .

[11]  K. Moorthy,et al.  Product and Price Competition in a Duopoly , 1988 .

[12]  Peter L. Swan,et al.  The Durability of Goods and Regulation of Monopoly , 1971 .

[13]  Jerry Ellis Good Stuff Cheap , 2000 .

[14]  L. V. Wassenhove,et al.  MANAGING PRODUCT RETURNS FOR REMANUFACTURING , 2001 .

[15]  Jeremy I. Bulow Durable-Goods Monopolists , 1982, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  Michael Waldman,et al.  Eliminating the Market for Secondhand Goods: An Alternative Explanation for Leasing1 , 1997, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[17]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  Production, Manufacturing and Logistics Competitive advantage through take-back of used products , 2005 .

[18]  P. Swan Durability of Consumption Goods , 1970 .

[19]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  Upgrades, Tradeins, and Buybacks , 1998 .

[20]  Michael Waldman Durable Goods Theory for Real World Markets , 2003 .

[21]  V. Guide Production planning and control for remanufacturing: industry practice and research needs , 2000 .

[22]  James D. Hess,et al.  Price Discrimination through a Distribution Channel: Theory and Evidence , 1994 .

[23]  Mark E. Ferguson,et al.  The Effect of Competition on Recovery Strategies , 2006 .

[24]  Jayashankar M. Swaminathan,et al.  Managing New and Remanufactured Products , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[25]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Remanufacturing as a Marketing Strategy , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[26]  Jae-Cheol Kim Trade in Used Goods and Durability Choice , 1989 .

[27]  J. Goodman Note on Existence and Uniqueness of Equilibrium Points for Concave N-Person Games , 1965 .

[28]  Ramanath Subramanyam,et al.  Key Factors in the Market for Remanufactured Products , 2012, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[29]  Harikesh S. Nair Intertemporal price discrimination with forward-looking consumers: Application to the US market for console video-games , 2007 .

[30]  R. Coase Durability and Monopoly , 1972, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[31]  George Norman The Economics of Price Discrimination , 1985 .

[32]  H. Groenevelt,et al.  COMPETITION IN REMANUFACTURING , 2001 .

[33]  Ramayya Krishnan,et al.  Effect of Electronic Secondary Markets on the Supply Chain , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[34]  R. T. Lund,et al.  Start-up guidelines for the independent remanufacturer , 1983 .

[35]  Preyas S. Desai Leasing and Selling: Optimal Marketing Strategies for a Durable Goods Firm (Лизинг и продажи: оптимальные маркетинговые стратегии для изготовителя товаров длительного пользования) , 1998 .

[36]  K. Moorthy Market Segmentation, Self-Selection, and Product Line Design , 1984 .

[37]  Inseong Song,et al.  A Micromodel of New Product Adoption with Heterogeneous and Forward-Looking Consumers: Application to the Digital Camera Category , 2003 .

[38]  S. Ryan,et al.  Optimal Price and Quantity of Refurbished Products , 2006 .

[39]  Ming-Deh A. Huang,et al.  Proof of proposition 2 , 1992 .

[40]  Louis Phlips,et al.  The Economics of Price Discrimination , 1983 .

[41]  A. Coughlan,et al.  Used goods, not used bads: Profitable secondary market sales for a durable goods channel , 2007 .

[42]  J. Tirole The Theory of Industrial Organization , 1988 .

[43]  Alessandro Lizzeri,et al.  Adverse Selection in Durable Goods Markets , 1997 .

[44]  Marc Salomon,et al.  Strategic Issues in Product Recovery Management , 1995 .

[45]  H. Miller,et al.  On Killing off the Market for Used Textbooks and the Relationship between Markets for New and Secondhand Goods , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[46]  James D. Hess,et al.  Pull Promotions and Channel Coordination , 1995 .

[47]  Stan J. Liebowitz,et al.  Durability, Market Structure, and New-Used Goods Models , 1982 .

[48]  V. Daniel R. Guide,et al.  The Potential for Cannibalization of New Products Sales by Remanufactured Products , 2010, Decis. Sci..

[49]  Vish Krishnan,et al.  Designing a Family of Development-Intensive Products , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[50]  James D. Hess,et al.  A Theory of Channel Price Promotions , 1991 .

[51]  Michael Waldman Durable Goods Pricing When Quality Matters , 1996 .

[52]  Erica L. Plambeck,et al.  Effects of E-Waste Regulation on New Product Introduction , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[53]  Mark E. Ferguson,et al.  How Should a Firm Manage Deteriorating Inventory , 2009 .

[54]  Ming-Deh A. Huang,et al.  Proof of proposition 1 , 1992 .

[55]  Harikesh S. Nair,et al.  Intertemporal price discrimination with forward-looking consumers: Application to the US market for console video-games , 2006 .

[56]  John Rust,et al.  When Is It Optimal to Kill Off the Market for Used Durable Goods , 1986 .

[57]  Roger C. Kormendi,et al.  The Interrelationship between Markets for New and Used Durable Goods , 1974, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[58]  I. Hendel,et al.  The Role of Leasing under Adverse Selection , 1998, Journal of Political Economy.

[59]  D. Gaskins,et al.  Alcoa revisited: The welfare implications of a secondhand market , 1974 .

[60]  Preyas S. Desai Quality Segmentation in Spatial Markets: When Does Cannibalization Affect Product Line Design? , 2001 .

[61]  Mark Ferguson,et al.  Appendix to "Relicensing Fees as a Secondary Market Strategy" , 2007 .

[62]  Peter L. Swan,et al.  Alcoa: The Influence of Recycling on Monopoly Power , 1980, Journal of Political Economy.