Bidirectional antagonistic variable stiffness actuation: Analysis, design & Implementation

The variable stiffness actuation concept is considered to provide a human-friendly robot technology. This paper examines a joint concept called the bidirectional antagonistic joint which is a extension of antagonistic joints. A new operating mode called the helping mode is introduced, which increases the joint load range. Although the joint can not be pretensioned in the helping mode, it is shown that a stiffness variation is possible, assuming a suitable torque-stiffness characteristic of the elastic elements. A methodology to design such characteristics is presented along with several example cases interpreted in a torque-stiffness plot. Furthermore, a stiffness adaptation control scheme which ensures mechanism safety is described. Finally, the design methodology and the control are evaluated on an implementation of a bidirectional antagonistic joint.

[1]  Marc H. Raibert,et al.  Legged Robots That Balance , 1986, IEEE Expert.

[2]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Design of components for programmable passive impedance , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Shigeki Sugano,et al.  Design and development of a new robot joint using a mechanical impedance adjuster , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  Matthew M. Williamson,et al.  Series elastic actuators , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[5]  Yoshinori Watanabe,et al.  Antagonistic muscle-like actuator and its application to multi-d.o.f. forearm prosthesis , 1997, Adv. Robotics.

[6]  Yoshihiko Nakamura,et al.  Design of programmable passive compliance shoulder mechanism , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[7]  Joel E. Chestnutt,et al.  An actuator with physically variable stiffness for highly dynamic legged locomotion , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[8]  Koichi Koganezawa,et al.  Mechanical stiffness control for antagonistically driven joints , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[9]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Design and Control of a Variable Stiffness Actuator for Safe and Fast Physical Human/Robot Interaction , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  Stephen P. DeWeerth,et al.  Biologically Inspired Joint Stiffness Control , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Exploiting Natural Dynamics to Reduce Energy Consumption by Controlling the Compliance of Soft Actuators , 2006, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[12]  Bruno Siciliano PHRIENDS - Physical human-robot interaction: dependability and safety , 2007 .

[13]  G. Hirzinger,et al.  A new variable stiffness design: Matching requirements of the next robot generation , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Alin Albu-Schaffer,et al.  Soft robotics , 2008, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[15]  Alin Albu-Schaffer,et al.  Kick it like a Safe Robot: Requirements for 2050 , 2008 .

[16]  Giorgio Grioli,et al.  VSA-II: a novel prototype of variable stiffness actuator for safe and performing robots interacting with humans , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[17]  Patrick van der Smagt,et al.  Antagonism for a Highly Anthropomorphic Hand–Arm System , 2008, Adv. Robotics.

[18]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Requirements for Safe Robots: Measurements, Analysis and New Insights , 2009, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[19]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Kick it with elasticity: Safety and performance in human-robot soccer , 2009, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[20]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  Nonlinear decoupled motion-stiffness control and collision detection/reaction for the VSA-II variable stiffness device , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[21]  Gerd Hirzinger,et al.  Torque and workspace analysis for flexible tendon driven mechanisms , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[22]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  On joint design with intrinsic variable compliance: derivation of the DLR QA-Joint , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.