Current methods for the prediction of T‐cell epitopes
暂无分享,去创建一个
Ricardo L. Mancera | Mahreen Arooj | M. Arooj | Prattusha Kar | Lanie Ruiz‐Perez | Lanie Ruiz‐Perez | R. Mancera | Prattusha Kar | Mahreen Arooj
[1] P. Bradley,et al. Quantifiable predictive features define epitope-specific T cell receptor repertoires , 2017, Nature.
[2] Mark Gerstein,et al. High-order neural networks and kernel methods for peptide-MHC binding prediction , 2015, Bioinform..
[3] Bhartendu Nath Mishra,et al. Prediction of MHC class I binding peptides using probability distribution functions , 2009, Bioinformation.
[4] Nenad S. Mitic,et al. Software tools for simultaneous data visualization and T cell epitopes and disorder prediction in proteins , 2016, J. Biomed. Informatics.
[5] Jean-Philippe Vert,et al. Efficient peptide-MHC-I binding prediction for alleles with few known binders , 2008, Bioinform..
[6] Yingdong Zhao,et al. Application of support vector machines for T-cell epitopes prediction , 2003, Bioinform..
[7] Eugene N Muratov,et al. Existing and Developing Approaches for QSAR Analysis of Mixtures , 2012, Molecular informatics.
[8] Shinn-Ying Ho,et al. POPISK: T-cell reactivity prediction using support vector machines and string kernels , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.
[9] Gajendra P.S. Raghava,et al. Prediction of CTL epitopes using QM, SVM and ANN techniques. , 2004, Vaccine.
[10] T. Lundstedt,et al. Development of proteo-chemometrics: a novel technology for the analysis of drug-receptor interactions. , 2001, Biochimica et biophysica acta.
[11] U. Hobohm,et al. A pattern search method for putative anchor residues in T cell epitopes , 1993, European journal of immunology.
[12] Gajendra P. S. Raghava,et al. ProPred1: Prediction of Promiscuous MHC Class-I Binding Sites , 2003, Bioinform..
[13] Kristin Ladell,et al. Modification of MHC Anchor Residues Generates Heteroclitic Peptides That Alter TCR Binding and T Cell Recognition , 2010, The Journal of Immunology.
[14] Vibha Jawa,et al. T-cell dependent immunogenicity of protein therapeutics: Preclinical assessment and mitigation. , 2013, Clinical immunology.
[15] Darren R Flower,et al. Towards in silico prediction of immunogenic epitopes. , 2003, Trends in immunology.
[16] Vladimir Brusic,et al. Computational methods for prediction of T-cell epitopes--a framework for modelling, testing, and applications. , 2004, Methods.
[17] David S. Goodsell,et al. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function , 1998 .
[18] K. Parker,et al. Scheme for ranking potential HLA-A2 binding peptides based on independent binding of individual peptide side-chains. , 1994, Journal of immunology.
[19] R Abagyan,et al. Homology modeling with internal coordinate mechanics: Deformation zone mapping and improvements of models via conformational search , 1997, Proteins.
[20] T. Williams. Human leukocyte antigen gene polymorphism and the histocompatibility laboratory. , 2001, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.
[21] Hassan Mohabatkar,et al. Homology Modeling and Conformational Epitope Prediction of Envelope Protein of Alkhumra Haemorrhagic Fever Virus , 2014, Journal of arthropod-borne diseases.
[22] Jessica Holien,et al. Improvements, trends, and new ideas in molecular docking: 2012–2013 in review , 2015, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.
[23] P. Coveney,et al. Toward an atomistic understanding of the immune synapse: large-scale molecular dynamics simulation of a membrane-embedded TCR-pMHC-CD4 complex. , 2008, Molecular immunology.
[24] Ji Wan,et al. SVRMHC prediction server for MHC-binding peptides , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.
[25] Corinna Cortes,et al. Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.
[26] Jennifer L. Johnson,et al. Transcriptome Analysis in Domesticated Species: Challenges and Strategies , 2015, Bioinformatics and biology insights.
[27] Irini A. Doytchinova,et al. Towards the in silico identification of class II restricted T-cell epitopes: a partial least squares iterative self-consistent algorithm for affinity prediction , 2003, Bioinform..
[28] O. Lund,et al. The role of the proteasome in generating cytotoxic T-cell epitopes: insights obtained from improved predictions of proteasomal cleavage , 2005, Immunogenetics.
[29] Sitao Wu,et al. MUSTER: Improving protein sequence profile–profile alignments by using multiple sources of structure information , 2008, Proteins.
[30] Morten Nielsen,et al. NetMHCcons: a consensus method for the major histocompatibility complex class I predictions , 2011, Immunogenetics.
[31] Oliver Kohlbacher,et al. SVMHC: a server for prediction of MHC-binding peptides , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..
[32] Peter V Coveney,et al. Molecular dynamics simulations: bring biomolecular structures alive on a computer. , 2007, Methods in molecular biology.
[33] D. Flower,et al. Toward the quantitative prediction of T-cell epitopes: coMFA and coMSIA studies of peptides with affinity for the class I MHC molecule HLA-A*0201. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[34] A. D. De Groot,et al. Prediction of well-conserved HIV-1 ligands using a matrix-based algorithm, EpiMatrix. , 1998, Vaccine.
[35] S. H. van der Burg,et al. Immunogenicity of peptides bound to MHC class I molecules depends on the MHC-peptide complex stability. , 1996, Journal of immunology.
[36] Peter Cresswell,et al. Pathways of antigen processing. , 2013, Annual review of immunology.
[37] H. Margalit,et al. Sequence features that correlate with MHC restriction. , 1994, Molecular immunology.
[38] M. Mezei,et al. Molecular docking: a powerful approach for structure-based drug discovery. , 2011, Current computer-aided drug design.
[39] B. Berne,et al. Role of the active-site solvent in the thermodynamics of factor Xa ligand binding. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[40] Darren R. Flower,et al. Towards the knowledge-based design of universal influenza epitope ensemble vaccines , 2016, Bioinform..
[41] D. Flower,et al. Static energy analysis of MHC class I and class II peptide-binding affinity. , 2007, Methods in molecular biology.
[42] John Sidney,et al. Examining the independent binding assumption for binding of peptide epitopes to MHC-I molecules , 2003, Bioinform..
[43] Peter V Coveney,et al. T-cell epitope prediction and immune complex simulation using molecular dynamics: state of the art and persisting challenges , 2010, Immunome research.
[44] Adnane Achour,et al. Major Histocompatibility Complex: Interaction with Peptides , 2001 .
[45] David W. Corne,et al. An Investigation of the Negative Selection Algorithm for Fault Detection in Refrigeration Systems , 2003, ICARIS.
[46] David A. Winkler,et al. The role of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) in biomolecular discovery , 2002, Briefings Bioinform..
[47] Elizabeth Yuriev,et al. Latest developments in molecular docking: 2010–2011 in review , 2013, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.
[48] Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..
[49] Sneh Lata,et al. TAPPred prediction of TAP-binding peptides in antigens. , 2007, Methods in molecular biology.
[50] Peicho Petkov,et al. HLA‐DP2 binding prediction by molecular dynamics simulations , 2011, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[51] R. Schwartz. T-lymphocyte recognition of antigen in association with gene products of the major histocompatibility complex. , 1985, Annual review of immunology.
[52] A. Sewell,et al. Advances in T-Cell Epitope Engineering , 2013, Front. Immunol..
[53] N. Shen,et al. Prediction and Identification of T Cell Epitopes in the H5N1 Influenza Virus Nucleoprotein in Chicken , 2012, PloS one.
[54] Bjoern Peters,et al. HLA Class I Alleles Are Associated with Peptide-Binding Repertoires of Different Size, Affinity, and Immunogenicity , 2013, The Journal of Immunology.
[55] Francisco A. Chaves,et al. The kinetic stability of MHC class II:peptide complexes is a key parameter that dictates immunodominance. , 2005, Immunity.
[56] K. Garcia,et al. How a Single T Cell Receptor Recognizes Both Self and Foreign MHC , 2007, Cell.
[57] L R Pease,et al. Structural basis of plasticity in T cell receptor recognition of a self peptide-MHC antigen. , 1998, Science.
[58] V. DelVecchio,et al. Computational and Experimental Validation of B and T-Cell Epitopes of the In Vivo Immune Response to a Novel Malarial Antigen , 2013, PloS one.
[59] António J. M. Ribeiro,et al. Protein-ligand docking in the new millennium--a retrospective of 10 years in the field. , 2013, Current medicinal chemistry.
[60] Byung-Jun Yoon,et al. Hidden Markov Models and their Applications in Biological Sequence Analysis , 2009, Current genomics.
[61] Gajendra P. S. Raghava,et al. ProPred: prediction of HLA-DR binding sites , 2001, Bioinform..
[62] Md. Rezaul Islam,et al. Prediction of Epitope-Based Peptides for the Utility of Vaccine Development from Fusion and Glycoprotein of Nipah Virus Using In Silico Approach , 2014, Adv. Bioinformatics.
[63] Morten Nielsen,et al. Prediction of MHC class II binding affinity using SMM-align, a novel stabilization matrix alignment method , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.
[64] Pingping Guan,et al. EpiJen: a server for multistep T cell epitope prediction , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.
[65] H. Rammensee,et al. Discrete Cleavage Motifs of Constitutive and Immunoproteasomes Revealed by Quantitative Analysis of Cleavage Products , 2001, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[66] Olivier Michielin,et al. Interplay between T Cell Receptor Binding Kinetics and the Level of Cognate Peptide Presented by Major Histocompatibility Complexes Governs CD8+ T Cell Responsiveness* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[67] Morten Nielsen,et al. Large-scale validation of methods for cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitope prediction , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.
[68] Mark Walport,et al. Antigen Presentation to T Lymphocytes , 2001 .
[69] Hasan H. Otu,et al. Prediction of peptides binding to MHC class I and II alleles by temporal motif mining , 2013, BMC Bioinformatics.
[70] Z. Weng,et al. A flexible docking approach for prediction of T cell receptor–peptide–MHC complexes , 2013, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[71] A. Ismail,et al. Antioxidant Capacities of Peel, Pulp, and Seed Fractions of Canarium odontophyllum Miq. Fruit , 2010, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.
[72] Manuel C. Peitsch,et al. SWISS-MODEL: an automated protein homology-modeling server , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..
[73] B. Maillère,et al. 3-Layer-based analysis of peptide-MHC interaction: in silico prediction, peptide binding affinity and T cell activation in a relevant allergen-specific model. , 2009, Molecular immunology.
[74] Simon J Davis,et al. Molecular interactions mediating T cell antigen recognition. , 2003, Annual review of immunology.
[75] Hau-San Wong,et al. TEPITOPEpan: Extending TEPITOPE for Peptide Binding Prediction Covering over 700 HLA-DR Molecules , 2012, PloS one.
[76] Sneh Lata,et al. MHCBN 4.0: A database of MHC/TAP binding peptides and T-cell epitopes , 2009, BMC Research Notes.
[77] M. Segal,et al. Relating Amino Acid Sequence to Phenotype: Analysis of Peptide‐Binding Data , 2000, Biometrics.
[78] Michael J E Sternberg,et al. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis , 2015, Nature Protocols.
[79] Matthew N Davies,et al. Harnessing bioinformatics to discover new vaccines. , 2007, Drug discovery today.
[80] E. Sercarz,et al. MHC-guided processing: binding of large antigen fragments , 2003, Nature Reviews Immunology.
[81] I. Dimopoulos,et al. Application of neural networks to modelling nonlinear relationships in ecology , 1996 .
[82] D Rognan,et al. Molecular dynamics simulation of MHC-peptide complexes as a tool for predicting potential T cell epitopes. , 1994, Biochemistry.
[83] Sitao Wu,et al. Ab Initio Protein Structure Prediction , 2009 .
[84] Vladimir Brusic,et al. Prediction of MHC class II-binding peptides using an evolutionary algorithm and artificial neural network , 1998, Bioinform..
[85] Xinglong Yu,et al. An introduction to epitope prediction methods and software , 2009, Reviews in medical virology.
[86] Irini A. Doytchinova,et al. EpiTOP - a proteochemometric tool for MHC class II binding prediction , 2010, Bioinform..
[87] Miki Akamatsu,et al. Current state and perspectives of 3D-QSAR. , 2002, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[88] Tao Han,et al. A microarray study of MPP+-treated PC12 Cells: Mechanisms of toxicity (MOT) analysis using bioinformatics tools , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.
[89] Lydia E. Kavraki,et al. Protein–Ligand Interactions: Computational Docking , 2012 .
[90] P. Roepstorff,et al. MHC class II loading of high or low affinity peptides directed by Ii/peptide fusion constructs: implications for T cell activation. , 2003, International immunology.
[91] M. dal Peraro,et al. Peptide-Based Vaccinology: Experimental and Computational Approaches to Target Hypervariable Viruses through the Fine Characterization of Protective Epitopes Recognized by Monoclonal Antibodies and the Identification of T-Cell-Activating Peptides , 2013, Clinical & developmental immunology.
[92] C. Janeway. Immunobiology: The Immune System in Health and Disease , 1996 .
[93] Richard D. Taylor,et al. Improved protein–ligand docking using GOLD , 2003, Proteins.
[94] Pingping Guan,et al. MHCPred: a server for quantitative prediction of peptide-MHC binding , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..
[95] B. Posteraro,et al. Human Monoclonal Antibody-Based Therapy in the Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis , 2013, Clinical & developmental immunology.
[96] H. Margalit,et al. Ranking potential binding peptides to MHC molecules by a computational threading approach. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.
[97] J. M. González,et al. Effect of secondary anchor amino acid substitutions on the immunogenic properties of an HLA-A*0201-restricted T cell epitope derived from the Trypanosoma cruzi KMP-11 protein , 2016, Peptides.
[98] T. Mak,et al. CD8 is needed for development of cytotoxic T but not helper T cells , 1991, Cell.
[99] M. A. Batalia,et al. Peptide binding by class I and class II MHC molecules. , 1997, Biopolymers.
[100] Irini Doytchinova,et al. Peptide binding to HLA-DP proteins at pH 5.0 and pH 7.0: a quantitative molecular docking study , 2012, BMC Structural Biology.
[101] Anna Goldenberg,et al. TensorFlow: Biology's Gateway to Deep Learning? , 2016, Cell systems.
[102] Wei Li,et al. ElliPro: a new structure-based tool for the prediction of antibody epitopes , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.
[103] Darren R. Flower,et al. Predicting Class II MHC-Peptide binding: a kernel based approach using similarity scores , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.
[104] Morten Nielsen,et al. Quantitative Predictions of Peptide Binding to Any HLA-DR Molecule of Known Sequence: NetMHCIIpan , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[105] Yanqing Niu,et al. Accurate Prediction of Immunogenic T-Cell Epitopes from Epitope Sequences Using the Genetic Algorithm-Based Ensemble Learning , 2015, PloS one.
[106] Miles P. Davenport,et al. An empirical method for the prediction of T-cell epitopes , 2004, Immunogenetics.
[107] Charles Y. Chiu,et al. Erratum to: Clinical metagenomic identification of Balamuthia mandrillaris encephalitis and assembly of the draft genome: the continuing case for reference genome sequencing , 2016, Genome Medicine.
[108] Alessandro Sette,et al. Generating quantitative models describing the sequence specificity of biological processes with the stabilized matrix method , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.
[109] Svante Wold,et al. Chemometrics; what do we mean with it, and what do we want from it? , 1995 .
[110] Gregory R. Grant,et al. Bioinformatics - The Machine Learning Approach , 2000, Comput. Chem..
[111] Pedro A Reche,et al. Prediction of MHC-peptide binding: a systematic and comprehensive overview. , 2009, Current pharmaceutical design.
[112] Oliver Kohlbacher,et al. T-cell epitope prediction based on self-tolerance , 2011, BCB '11.
[113] Polamarasetty Aparoy,et al. Structure and Ligand Based Drug Design Strategies in the Development of Novel 5-LOX Inhibitors , 2012, Current medicinal chemistry.
[114] Morten Nielsen,et al. Accurate pan-specific prediction of peptide-MHC class II binding affinity with improved binding core identification , 2015, Immunogenetics.
[115] Gajendra P. S. Raghava,et al. SVM based method for predicting HLA-DRB1*0401 binding peptides in an antigen sequence , 2004, Bioinform..
[116] H Mamitsuka,et al. Predicting peptides that bind to MHC molecules using supervised learning of hidden markov models , 1998, Proteins.
[117] V. Engelhard,et al. Structure of peptides associated with class I and class II MHC molecules. , 1994, Annual review of immunology.
[118] Morten Nielsen,et al. Peptide‐MHC class I stability is a better predictor than peptide affinity of CTL immunogenicity , 2012, European journal of immunology.
[119] Morten Nielsen,et al. NNAlign: A Web-Based Prediction Method Allowing Non-Expert End-User Discovery of Sequence Motifs in Quantitative Peptide Data , 2011, PloS one.
[120] O. Lund,et al. novel sequence representations Reliable prediction of T-cell epitopes using neural networks with , 2003 .
[121] M. Feltkamp,et al. Efficient MHC class I-peptide binding is required but does not ensure MHC class I-restricted immunogenicity. , 1994, Molecular immunology.
[122] M. V. van Zelm,et al. The activation of the adaptive immune system: cross-talk between antigen-presenting cells, T cells and B cells. , 2014, Immunology letters.
[123] Morten Nielsen,et al. Accurate approximation method for prediction of class I MHC affinities for peptides of length 8, 10 and 11 using prediction tools trained on 9mers , 2008, Bioinform..
[124] Rahul Kumar,et al. In Silico Approach for Predicting Toxicity of Peptides and Proteins , 2013, PloS one.
[125] Irini Doytchinova,et al. T-cell epitope vaccine design by immunoinformatics , 2013, Open Biology.
[126] Holger Gohlke,et al. The Amber biomolecular simulation programs , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..
[127] E. Davidson,et al. IMMUNOINFORMATICS: PREDICTING IMMUNOGENICITY IN SILICO , 2008 .
[128] B. Vengamma,et al. Computational approaches to identify common subunit vaccine candidates against bacterial meningitis , 2013, Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences.
[129] Gajendra P. S. Raghava,et al. Pcleavage: an SVM based method for prediction of constitutive proteasome and immunoproteasome cleavage sites in antigenic sequences , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[130] Jianpeng Ma,et al. CHARMM: The biomolecular simulation program , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..
[131] O. Delalande,et al. A transcriptional-switch model for Slr1738-controlled gene expression in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis , 2012, BMC Structural Biology.
[132] Pandjassarame Kangueane,et al. Bioinformatics: A Concept-Based Introduction , 2008 .
[133] T. Hanai,et al. Hidden Markov model-based prediction of antigenic peptides that interact with MHC class II molecules. , 2002, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.
[134] Uthaman Gowthaman,et al. In silico tools for predicting peptides binding to HLA-class II molecules: more confusion than conclusion. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.
[135] Ewan Birney,et al. Hidden Markov models in biological sequence analysis , 2001, IBM J. Res. Dev..
[136] Gajendra P.S. Raghava,et al. A hybrid approach for predicting promiscuous MHC class I restricted T cell epitopes , 2007, Journal of Biosciences.
[137] M. Nielsen,et al. NetMHCpan-3.0; improved prediction of binding to MHC class I molecules integrating information from multiple receptor and peptide length datasets , 2016, Genome Medicine.
[138] K. Hadeler,et al. PAProC: a prediction algorithm for proteasomal cleavages available on the WWW , 2001, Immunogenetics.
[139] Akbar Nayeem,et al. A comparative study of available software for high‐accuracy homology modeling: From sequence alignments to structural models , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[140] Julie McMurry,et al. Immuno‐informatics: Mining genomes for vaccine components , 2002, Immunology and cell biology.
[141] A. D. De Groot,et al. T cell epitope: Friend or Foe? Immunogenicity of biologics in context☆ , 2009, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.
[142] Satoru Kuhara,et al. Use of Bonsai Decision Trees for the Identification of Potential MHC Class I Peptide Epitope Motifs , 1998, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.
[143] D. Gfeller,et al. Improving Binding Affinity and Stability of Peptide Ligands by Substituting Glycines with D‐Amino Acids , 2013, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.
[144] Tin Wee Tan,et al. Methods and protocols for prediction of immunogenic epitopes , 2006, Briefings Bioinform..
[145] Jitender Verma,et al. 3D-QSAR in drug design--a review. , 2010, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[146] V. Brusic,et al. Neural network-based prediction of candidate T-cell epitopes , 1998, Nature Biotechnology.
[147] Darren R Flower,et al. Coupling In Silico and In Vitro Analysis of Peptide-MHC Binding: A Bioinformatic Approach Enabling Prediction of Superbinding Peptides and Anchorless Epitopes , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.
[148] Morten Nielsen,et al. NetTepi: an integrated method for the prediction of T cell epitopes , 2014, Immunogenetics.
[149] M. Karplus,et al. CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .
[150] H. Fabian,et al. Increased Conformational Flexibility of HLA–B*27 Subtypes Associated With Ankylosing Spondylitis , 2015, Arthritis & rheumatology.
[151] J. Bajorath,et al. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[152] Channa K. Hattotuwagama,et al. Toward Prediction of Class II Mouse Major Histocompatibility Complex Peptide Binding Affinity: in Silico Bioinformatic Evaluation Using Partial Least Squares, a Robust Multivariate Statistical Technique , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[153] D. Flower,et al. QSAR and the Prediction of T-Cell Epitopes , 2008 .
[154] G. G. Stokes. "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.
[155] E. Reinherz,et al. Prediction of MHC class I binding peptides using profile motifs. , 2002, Human immunology.
[156] H. Rammensee,et al. SYFPEITHI: database for MHC ligands and peptide motifs , 1999, Immunogenetics.
[157] B. Yegnanarayana,et al. Artificial neural networks for pattern recognition , 1994 .
[158] M. Colonna,et al. Cutting Edge: Human Myeloid Cells Express an Activating ILT Receptor (ILT1) That Associates with Fc Receptor γ-Chain , 1999, The Journal of Immunology.
[159] D. van der Spoel,et al. GROMACS: A message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation , 1995 .
[160] K. Kim,et al. Selection of peptides that bind to the HLA-A2.1 molecule by molecular modelling. , 1996, Molecular immunology.
[161] Oliver Kohlbacher,et al. Immunoinformatics and epitope prediction in the age of genomic medicine , 2015, Genome Medicine.
[162] Yixin Chen,et al. A fast parallel algorithm for finding the longest common sequence of multiple biosequences , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.
[163] Huseyin Seker,et al. Quantitative prediction of peptide binding affinity by using hybrid fuzzy support vector regression , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..
[164] S. Brunak,et al. Predicting proteasomal cleavage sites: a comparison of available methods. , 2003, International immunology.
[165] Ying LU,et al. Decision tree methods: applications for classification and prediction , 2015, Shanghai archives of psychiatry.
[166] Roland L. Dunbrack,et al. Prediction of protein side-chain rotamers from a backbone-dependent rotamer library: a new homology modeling tool. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.
[167] Alessandro Sette,et al. Properties of MHC Class I Presented Peptides That Enhance Immunogenicity , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[168] Ravinder Singh,et al. Fast-Find: A novel computational approach to analyzing combinatorial motifs , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.
[169] O. Lund,et al. The Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource: From Vision to Blueprint , 2005, PLoS biology.
[170] C. Janeway,et al. Innate immune recognition. , 2002, Annual review of immunology.
[171] Mikael Bodén,et al. PREDIVAC: CD4+ T-cell epitope prediction for vaccine design that covers 95% of HLA class II DR protein diversity , 2013, BMC Bioinformatics.
[172] Yi Zhang,et al. Computational prediction of cleavage using proteasomal in vitro digestion and MHC I ligand data , 2013, Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B.
[173] Didier Rognan,et al. Recovery of known T-cell epitopes by computational scanning of a viral genome , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[174] Sneh Lata,et al. Application of machine learning techniques in predicting MHC binders. , 2007, Methods in molecular biology.
[175] A. Z. Maksyutov,et al. TEpredict: Software for T-Cell epitope prediction , 2010, Molecular Biology.
[176] Mark J. Schreiber,et al. Decision Tree Algorithms Predict the Diagnosis and Outcome of Dengue Fever in the Early Phase of Illness , 2008, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.
[177] Guido Scarabelli,et al. Predicting interaction sites from the energetics of isolated proteins: a new approach to epitope mapping. , 2010, Biophysical journal.
[178] Philip J Norris,et al. A hairpin turn in a class II MHC-bound peptide orients residues outside the binding groove for T cell recognition. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[179] David C. Jones,et al. GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.
[180] M. Nielsen,et al. NetMHCstab – predicting stability of peptide–MHC‐I complexes; impacts for cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitope discovery , 2014, Immunology.
[181] Morten Nielsen,et al. Pan-specific MHC class I predictors: a benchmark of HLA class I pan-specific prediction methods , 2009, Bioinform..
[182] S. Vajda,et al. Anchor residues in protein-protein interactions. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[183] Morten Nielsen,et al. NetCTLpan: pan-specific MHC class I pathway epitope predictions , 2010, Immunogenetics.
[184] P. Dönnes,et al. Integrated modeling of the major events in the MHC class I antigen processing pathway , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[185] D. Rognan,et al. Customized versus universal scoring functions: application to class I MHC-peptide binding free energy predictions. , 2001, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.
[186] Matthew P. Repasky,et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[187] J. Neefjes,et al. Towards a systems understanding of MHC class I and MHC class II antigen presentation , 2011, Nature Reviews Immunology.
[188] Gajendra P. S. Raghava,et al. Analysis and prediction of antibacterial peptides , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.
[189] Kun Yu,et al. Methods for Prediction of Peptide Binding to MHC Molecules: A Comparative Study , 2002, Molecular medicine.
[190] L. Zhihua,et al. Toward the quantitative prediction of T-cell epitopes: QSAR studies on peptides having affinity with the class I MHC molecular HLA-A*0201. , 2004, Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology.
[191] Gajendra P. S. Raghava,et al. MHCBN: a comprehensive database of MHC binding and non-binding peptides , 2003, Bioinform..
[192] S. Landry,et al. Antigen structure influences helper T‐cell epitope dominance in the human immune response to HIV envelope glycoprotein gp120 , 2008, European journal of immunology.
[193] Alex Zhavoronkov,et al. Applications of Deep Learning in Biomedicine. , 2016, Molecular pharmaceutics.
[194] K. Garcia,et al. T cell receptor signaling is limited by docking geometry to peptide-major histocompatibility complex. , 2011, Immunity.
[195] O. Schueler‐Furman,et al. Structure‐based prediction of binding peptides to MHC class I molecules: Application to a broad range of MHC alleles , 2000, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[196] Irini A. Doytchinova,et al. JenPep: a database of quantitative functional peptide data for immunology , 2002, Bioinform..
[197] Ruihong Huang,et al. Construction of protein profile classification model and screening of proteomic signature of acute leukemia. , 2014, International journal of clinical and experimental pathology.
[198] Hanah Margalit,et al. A structure-based approach for prediction of MHC-binding peptides. , 2004, Methods.
[199] Karim Benkirane,et al. Comparison of DNA methylation profiles in human fetal and adult red blood cell progenitors , 2015, Genome Medicine.
[200] Channa K. Hattotuwagama,et al. MHCPred 2.0 , 2006 .
[201] Debashis Ghosh,et al. Peptide length-based prediction of peptide-MHC class II binding , 2006, Bioinform..
[202] Thomas Lengauer,et al. DynaPred: A structure and sequence based method for the prediction of MHC class I binding peptide sequences and conformations , 2006, ISMB.